The Embassy of Good Science - User contributions [en]

Resource:9cc8ba1f-909e-438c-858a-831e2222aa4b

2025-09-03T10:31:42Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science-Society Facilitators |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b3..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science-Society Facilitators
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science-Society Facilitators—CSOs, advocacy groups, citizen science networks, NGOs, and community advisory boards—on fostering societal trust in science. It highlights challenges such as tokenistic participation, power imbalances, and structural barriers like short-term funding and limited institutional support. The guidance stresses co-creation, inclusivity, and sustained dialogue, along with ethical safeguards and recognition of citizen contributions. By bridging science and society through genuine collaboration, facilitators can strengthen trust and make research more relevant, equitable, and accountable.
|Important Because=Science-Society Facilitators are essential Stewards of Trust, linking research with diverse communities and ensuring science addresses real societal needs. Yet, engagement efforts often fall short, reduced to tokenistic exercises that meet funding requirements without genuinely empowering citizens. This risks reinforcing perceptions of science as top-down, inaccessible, and detached from public concerns—particularly among historically marginalised groups who may carry negative experiences with scientific or healthcare institutions.

Structural barriers such as short-term funding, limited institutional backing, and rigid project structures further constrain meaningful engagement. Power imbalances within participatory processes, data privacy concerns, and weak inclusion of underrepresented groups undermine credibility. Religious, ideological, or political tensions may complicate coalition-building, while citizen science projects often struggle to extend beyond organised civil society.

The recommendations in this resource are important because they shift engagement from consultation toward true co-creation. By integrating local knowledge, ensuring fair recognition of citizen contributions, and building inclusive platforms for dialogue, facilitators can create sustained, equitable, and responsive models of engagement. Adequate funding, training, and ethical safeguards are critical. Through these practices, facilitators transform science from an elite endeavour into a collaborative, accountable, and trusted societal enterprise rooted in shared values and mutual learning.
|Important For=Civil society organisations; Advocacy groups; Citizen Scientists; Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs); Community Advisory Boards
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994465
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:969ad138-81f4-4588-b3bd-31b8129a12e6

2025-09-03T10:26:39Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-b..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science Policymakers—legislators, regulatory agencies, science advisory bodies, think tanks, and international organisations—on how to foster societal trust in science. It highlights challenges such as politicisation, short-term agendas, opaque decision-making, and weak citizen engagement. The guidance emphasises transparency, integrity, and inclusive dialogue, alongside stronger investment in science-policy interfaces and open science practices. By aligning research with societal needs and ensuring meaningful participation, policymakers can build legitimacy and strengthen trust in science-informed governance.
|Important Because=Policymakers occupy a critical position in shaping science, research, and innovation agendas, yet public trust in science-informed governance remains fragile. Scientific advice is often politicised, selectively used, or dismissed, particularly in contentious domains like climate, vaccination, or energy policy. Short electoral cycles, limited institutional capacity, and weak cross-ministerial coordination further undermine the integration of robust evidence into long-term strategies. Citizens may support science-based policies in principle but resist them in practice when they are excluded from decision-making or when transparency is lacking.

These recommendations are important because they address the systemic and cultural barriers that weaken trust at the science-policy interface. By embedding transparency, openness, and integrity into policy frameworks, policymakers can protect the autonomy of research institutions and align agendas with societal priorities and the Sustainable Development Goals. Inclusive engagement—moving beyond tokenism toward co-creation with citizens, researchers, and civil society—ensures legitimacy and strengthens democratic accountability.

Investing in science-policy interfaces, fostering interdisciplinary capacity, and supporting communication about evidence, uncertainty, and ethical trade-offs are vital. Policymakers who adopt these approaches not only improve the quality of governance but also foster a culture of trust where science is seen as credible, participatory, and central to societal progress.
|Important For=Government; Legislators; Regulatory Agencies; International Organisations; Think Tanks; Science Advisory Bodies; All stakeholders engaged in science policy
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994374
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:C5d2084a-1520-4a76-897d-c0561a496c79

2025-09-03T10:20:28Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Oversight and Protection Actors |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Oversight and Protection Actors
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science Oversight and Protection Actors—ethics committees, compliance bodies, impact assessment organisations, and monitoring funders—on how to foster trust in science. It highlights weaknesses in current oversight frameworks, such as outdated standards, underfunding, fragmented practices, and limited capacity for fast-moving fields like AI. The guidance stresses harmonised, binding standards, expanded ethics training, transparent disclosure, and inclusive engagement. Strengthening oversight ensures research integrity, accountability, and responsiveness, reinforcing science as credible and socially trusted.
|Important Because=Science oversight and protection actors safeguard ethical, legal, and safety standards, making them pivotal to sustaining public trust in science. Yet many existing frameworks are outdated, fragmented, or under-resourced, leaving them unable to keep pace with the complexity of modern research. Rapidly advancing fields like AI, synthetic biology, and data-intensive science highlight the limitations of non-binding ethical guidance, weak monitoring systems, and incentives that reward output over responsibility. These weaknesses are compounded by gaps in training, uneven global standards, and institutional resistance to reform.

Undervaluation of critical accountability mechanisms—independent science journalism, open access platforms, and peer review—further undermines transparency. The rise of predatory publishing and disparities in research infrastructure widen inequalities, while trust-related oversight remains overly concentrated in health sciences, neglecting areas such as climate and digital technologies.

The recommendations outlined in this resource are essential for revising and harmonising oversight mechanisms across disciplines and borders. Binding standards, stronger ethics training, and adaptive review systems are needed to address emerging risks. Transparency through open access, funding disclosure, and accessible communication must be reinforced. By institutionalising inclusive engagement and collaborating with civil society and media, oversight actors can ensure accountability, foster credibility, and build societal trust in science.
|Important For=Research Ethics Committees; Research Integrity Officers; All stakeholders in science oversight
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994268
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:7ff06f9f-a983-42f7-97c2-946d5d0ef91d

2025-09-03T09:57:01Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Implementers |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-b..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Implementers
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science Implementers—industry institutions, technology transfer offices, innovation hubs, incubators, and accelerators—on how to foster societal trust in science. It highlights challenges such as weak dialogue with communities, short-term funding cycles, proprietary interests, and lack of inclusive engagement. The guidance emphasises embedding accountability, transparency, and co-creation into implementation processes. By aligning innovations with societal needs, ensuring ethical oversight, and strengthening cross-sector collaboration, implementers can translate scientific breakthroughs into trusted, socially relevant, and accessible solutions.
|Important Because=Science implementers play a pivotal role in translating research into real-world applications, but this process often prioritises technical feasibility, market potential, or efficiency over inclusivity and long-term societal impact. As demonstrated with AI, GMOs, and pandemic technologies, innovations that are scientifically sound may still encounter public resistance when developed without dialogue, transparency, or attention to social consequences. Tokenistic consultation, proprietary interests, and fragmented implementation processes deepen public scepticism and erode trust.

These recommendations are important because they provide implementers with strategies to align scientific innovation more closely with societal expectations and values. By embedding transparency, ethical oversight, and clear communication of both benefits and limitations, implementers can reduce mistrust and increase accountability. Genuine co-creation, particularly with marginalised communities, ensures that innovations are not only technically robust but also socially relevant and equitable. Sustainable feedback mechanisms, long-term community engagement, and institutionalised cross-sector partnerships further strengthen trust by demonstrating responsiveness and inclusivity.

Open, accessible, and understandable innovation processes counter perceptions of elitism or profit-driven agendas, and help science implementers foster durable trust by ensuring that the application of research delivers meaningful benefits to society while upholding integrity and accountability.
|Important For=Industry; technology transfer offices; research commercialisation bodies; innovation hubs; All stakeholders in science implementation
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994245
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:0770057a-d740-42a4-8dfc-d3933e5f54e9

2025-09-03T09:21:26Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Funders |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Funders
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science Funders—public and private agencies, philanthropic organisations, and advocacy bodies—on how to foster trust in science. It highlights systemic challenges such as short-term funding models, rigid evaluation metrics, and limited support for socially relevant or interdisciplinary research. The guidance emphasises embedding transparency, societal relevance, open science, and public engagement into funding practices. By adopting flexible, equitable, and accountable approaches, funders can strengthen science’s responsiveness, integrity, and credibility, reinforcing public trust in research.
|Important Because=Science funders are powerful Stewards of Trust, as their decisions shape not only which research is conducted but also how science is perceived by society. Current funding systems are often challenged by prioritising short-term outputs, reinforcing inequalities, and failing to incentivise openness, inclusivity, or public engagement. Evaluation frameworks that focus narrowly on publications and metrics discourage interdisciplinary, socially relevant, and co-created research. Concentration of resources in already well-resourced institutions further deepens inequities, while underfunding independent journalism and open dissemination limits transparency and accountability.

The recommendations in this resource are important because they reorient funding frameworks toward practices that build durable societal trust. By embedding transparency, societal relevance, and accountability into funding criteria, funders can support open science, citizen science, and science communication. Flexible grant schemes that allow long-term collaboration and compensate community contributions ensure that science remains connected to societal needs. Funders also play a critical role in safeguarding integrity by requiring disclosure of conflicts of interest, supporting independent validation, and promoting equitable access to research infrastructures.

Ultimately, funding systems that reward openness, collaboration, and inclusivity not only improve research outcomes but also strengthen societal trust in science.
|Important For=Funders; All stakeholders in science funding
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994177
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:91182192-a742-4dc6-b982-55b98eea893b

2025-09-03T09:01:06Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides recommendations for Science Communicators— journalists, media outlets, influencers, and publishers—on how to foster public trust in science. It addresses challenges such as misinformation, fragmented media, undervaluation of communication in academia, and lack of inclusivity. The guidance emphasises open, contextualised, and two-way communication that respects scientific uncertainty and public diversity. It calls for institutional reforms, tailored strategies, and cross-sector collaboration to ensure science communication is accurate, engaging, ethical, and relevant to diverse audiences.
|Important Because=Science communication plays a decisive role in shaping how the public perceives and trusts science. In today’s digital-first environment, audiences increasingly rely on peer networks, influencers, and algorithm-driven platforms over institutional sources, leading to fragmentation, oversimplification, and the spread of misinformation. This dynamic not only undermines institutional trust but also makes it difficult to convey scientific uncertainty, particularly in polarised debates such as vaccines, climate change, or AI. Failures to provide nuance or contextualise evolving evidence risk backfiring and diminishing public confidence.

The recommendations in this resource are important because they reframe communication as an active, two-way process rather than a one-directional transfer of knowledge. By embedding dialogue, inclusivity, and contextualisation, communicators can bridge the gap between scientific expertise and societal values. Addressing systemic barriers—such as undervaluation of outreach in academia, limited funding, lack of training, and biased media representation—is essential to empower both professional communicators and scientists.

Implementing these recommendations strengthens the visibility of diverse voices, ensures accurate and ethical use of digital tools, and reinforces science as a public good. Ultimately, by making science more accessible, relatable, and participatory, communicators play a pivotal role in cultivating durable trust between science and society.
|Important For=Journalists; Science communicators; Journal editors; Social Media Influencers; All stakeholders in science communication
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994093
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:511c7983-cd2b-4f50-b0a1-a35da70b2d3a

2025-09-02T10:22:04Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Educators |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Educators
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource offers recommendations for Science Educators on how to foster public trust in science. It recognises the challenges science educators face—curriculum pressures, lack of training, fragmented policies, and limited institutional support—while highlighting opportunities to embed critical thinking, media literacy, and inquiry-based learning. The guidance encourages collaboration with communities, citizen science, and cross-sector initiatives. By adopting these approaches, educators can empower students, make science more accessible, and strengthen public trust in science.
|Important Because=Science educators are vital Stewards of Trust, shaping how future generations understand and engage with science. Yet they often work under systemic constraints: national curriculum demands, administrative burdens, and insufficient training in critical thinking, open science, and interdisciplinary approaches. These challenges are compounded by fragmented education policies, short political cycles, and weak institutional recognition of educators’ broader societal role. Without adequate support, science educators struggle to bridge the gap between scientific developments and public understanding.

The recommendations in this resource are important because they provide a roadmap for educators to build societal trust in science through practical and impactful methods. Embedding critical thinking, media literacy, and inquiry-based approaches equips students to navigate misinformation and appreciate the processes underpinning scientific knowledge. Strengthening links with communities via citizen science, outreach, and collaboration enhances the relevance of science to daily life, making it more inclusive and accessible.

Equally important is supporting educators themselves, with updated training, resources, and leadership commitment. Recognising and rewarding their role in fostering trust ensures that science education empowers rather than merely informs. These recommendations position educators as key actors in cultivating an informed, engaged, and trusting public.
|Important For=Educators; Faculty members; Teachers; Teacher trainers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994126
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:7d0ef13b-fcad-4170-9acb-1be6a249532c

2025-09-02T10:09:33Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=This resource provides targeted recommendations for Science Producers—scientists, research institutions, government agencies, private innovators, and public-private partnerships—on how to foster societal trust in science. The recommendations stress transparency, reproducibility, ethical practices, communication, open science, and co-creation. By adopting these approaches, Science Producers can strengthen trust across the broader ecosystem of science and society.
|Important Because=Science Producers are central to the Ecosystem of Trust in Science, as they directly generate research outputs, knowledge, and innovations that influence society. However, trust in their work is constrained by opaque knowledge-production processes, competitive funding structures, and performance metrics that prioritise outputs over societal value or collaboration. This environment discourages open science, interdisciplinary work, and co-creation with the public, weakening perceptions of science as a collective good.

At the same time, scientific research faces profound systemic changes. The rise of artificial intelligence, new funding mechanisms, and cross-sector collaborations provide opportunities to accelerate research and broaden participation. Yet they also raise concerns about transparency, accountability, and fairness, particularly as science becomes increasingly politicised and privatised. Such pressures risk undermining freedom of inquiry, distorting agendas, and eroding public confidence in science’s neutrality.

To sustain trust, Science Producers must adopt transparent, reproducible, and ethical practices. Disclosing funding, addressing conflicts of interest, embedding co-creation, and rethinking incentive structures are essential. By actively engaging with communities, fostering inclusivity, and promoting open science infrastructures, Science Producers can build durable and reciprocal trust within society and across the broader ecosystem.
|Important For=Academic institutions; Academic staff; Research institutions; Researchers; Researchers in public institutions; Researchers in the private sector
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16994418
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:05532d7d-75fe-4f10-aaa1-257727faedbd

2025-09-02T09:38:42Z

0000-0001-9028-9677:

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=The VERITY Protocol is a structured framework of 100 actionable recommendations designed to foster public trust in science. Developed through research and co-creation with over 500 stakeholders, it identifies six strategies: building trustworthy science, public engagement, education, science communication, supportive policies, and collaboration. By guiding 'Stewards of Trust'—actors with authority or influence—it provides practical tools to strengthen societal trust in science and ensure an ethical, inclusive, and effective ecosystem of trust in science.
|Important Because=Public trust in science is essential for scientific progress, democratic resilience, and informed policymaking. While confidence in science remains generally high in the EU and globally, persistent gaps exist between this trust and actual public adherence to science-based policies. The VERITY Protocol of Recommendations addresses this challenge with a comprehensive, evidence-based framework of 100 actionable recommendations designed to strengthen trust in science, research, and innovation.

Its importance lies in translating abstract trust into operational strategies that can be applied across the 'Ecosystem of Trust in Science.' By defining and supporting 'Stewards of Trust'—organisations, groups, and individuals with the capacity to influence perceptions of science—the Protocol ensures that trust-building is embedded in systems of governance, communication, and collaboration. The six overarching strategies—trustworthy science, public engagement, education, communication, supportive policies, and collaboration—offer a systemic roadmap for action.

The framework is co-created and validated with over 500 stakeholders, ensuring its recommendations are both scientifically robust and contextually relevant. It provides concrete tools for implementing Horizon Europe objectives, including societal engagement, ethical governance, and competitiveness in research. Ultimately, the VERITY Protocol is a critical resource for safeguarding science’s role in society.
|Important For=Academic institutions; Academic staff; All stakeholders in research; Citizen Scientists; Civil society organisations; Collaborating researchers; Decision makers; Educators; Funders; Industry; Journalists; Media; Policy-makers; Research Ethics Committees; Research Integrity Experts; Researchers; Scientists
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16975899
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:05532d7d-75fe-4f10-aaa1-257727faedbd

2025-09-02T09:05:44Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d |Is A..."

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d
|Is About=The VERITY Protocol is a structured framework of 100 actionable recommendations designed to foster public trust in science. Developed through research and co-creation with over 500 stakeholders, it identifies six strategies: building trustworthy science, public engagement, education, science communication, supportive policies, and collaboration. By guiding 'Stewards of Trust'—actors with authority or influence—it provides practical tools to strengthen societal trust in science and ensure an ethical, inclusive, and effective ecosystem of trust in science.
|Important Because=Public trust in science is essential for scientific progress, democratic resilience, and informed policymaking. While confidence in science remains generally high in the EU and globally, persistent gaps exist between this trust and actual public adherence to science-based policies. The VERITY Protocol of Recommendations addresses this challenge with a comprehensive, evidence-based framework of 100 actionable recommendations designed to strengthen trust in science, research, and innovation.

Its importance lies in translating abstract trust into operational strategies that can be applied across the 'Ecosystem of Trust in Science.' By defining and supporting 'Stewards of Trust'—organisations, groups, and individuals with the capacity to influence perceptions of science—the Protocol ensures that trust-building is embedded in systems of governance, communication, and collaboration. The six overarching strategies—trustworthy science, public engagement, education, communication, supportive policies, and collaboration—offer a systemic roadmap for action.

The framework is co-created and validated with over 500 stakeholders, ensuring its recommendations are both scientifically robust and contextually relevant. It provides concrete tools for implementing Horizon Europe objectives, including societal engagement, ethical governance, and competitiveness in research. Ultimately, the VERITY Protocol is a critical resource for safeguarding science’s role in society.
|Important For=All stakeholders in research; Academic institutions; Academic staff; Citizen Scientists; Civil society organisations; Collaborating researchers; Decision makers; Educators; Research Ethics Committees; Funders; Industry; Journalists; Media; Policy-makers; Researchers; Research Integrity Experts; Scientists
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/16975899
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Initiative:2f79d227-8b35-4500-bd2c-7dc6df8dbb0d

2025-08-11T11:50:18Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: Created page with "{{Initiative |Title=VERITY |Image=LOGO-VERITY.png |Has Link=https://verityproject.eu/ |Is About=<span lang="EN-GB">VERITY is a three-year Horizon Europe project, which works t..."

{{Initiative
|Title=VERITY
|Image=LOGO-VERITY.png
|Has Link=https://verityproject.eu/
|Is About=<span lang="EN-GB">VERITY is a three-year Horizon Europe project, which works to strengthen public trust in science by examining the complex ‘ecosystem of trust’ where trust is built, challenged, and maintained. In response to growing misinformation, public scepticism, and changing roles of scientific actors, VERITY introduces ‘Stewards of Trust’ (SOTs)—key individuals and institutions across eight domains, including science education, communication, and policy—whose actions and collaboration are essential for fostering public trust in science.</span>
}}

File:LOGO-VERITY.png

2025-08-11T11:49:23Z

0000-0001-9028-9677:

File:LOGO-VERITY-HORIZONTAL.png

2025-08-11T11:44:34Z

0000-0001-9028-9677:

User:0000-0001-9028-9677

2025-08-06T08:58:40Z

0000-0001-9028-9677: create user page