<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=0000-0002-0838-9626</id>
	<title>The Embassy of Good Science - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=0000-0002-0838-9626"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:Contributions/0000-0002-0838-9626"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T06:58:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3&amp;diff=2795</id>
		<title>Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Aef6b98d-9cc5-4db0-bffd-4a3daa99a3f3&amp;diff=2795"/>
		<updated>2020-08-01T12:04:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;0000-0002-0838-9626: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Resource&lt;br /&gt;
|Resource Type=Education&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project&lt;br /&gt;
|Is About=Members of The Embassy of Good Science have developed a set of eight scenarios for educational purposes and to stimulate strategic thinking about issues in research ethics and research integrity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This scenario presents a hypothetical narrative on the theme of [https://www.nrin.nl/wp-content/uploads/EnTIRE-WP5-Scenario-No.-1-From-D.5.4-final.pdf '''Publication and Dissemination'''.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It focuses on  issues regarding:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Dual submissions&lt;br /&gt;
*Authorship lists&lt;br /&gt;
*Plagiarism&lt;br /&gt;
*Complaints procedures&lt;br /&gt;
*Editorial decisions&lt;br /&gt;
*Retraction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is interspersed with questions and resource suggestions that help guide researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators in their deliberations concerning the  research integrity issues raised by the narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
|Important Because=The scenarios are designed to help researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to become better acquainted with ''[https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity]'' ('ECCRI' or 'ECoC') as a regulatory document that articulates the standards of good research practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They also allow users to reflect on and apply their own national and institutional research ethics and research integrity codes as well as other key regulatory documents and guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The goal  is for the user to gain knowledge of the standards associated with good research practices and to make sense of these standards in different research contexts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ECCRI/ECoC, there are eight categories of research contexts that are covered by the standards of good research practice: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)	Research Environment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2)	Training, Supervision and Mentoring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3)	Research Procedures&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4)	Safeguards&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5)	Data Practices and Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6)	Collaborative Working&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7)	[https://www.nrin.nl/wp-content/uploads/EnTIRE-WP5-Scenario-No.-1-From-D.5.4-final.pdf Publication and Dissemination]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8)	Reviewing, Evaluating and Editing&lt;br /&gt;
|Important For=Academic staff; Administrators; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Editors; Ethics committee members; Graduate students; Journal editors; Junior researchers; PhD Students; Postdocs; Professors; Research Integrity Officers; Research institutions; Researchers; Supervisors&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Best Practice=The aim of all eight scenarios is to allow researchers, research ethics committees ('RECs'), research integrity offices ('RIOs') and research administrators to focus their reflection on core principles and research contexts that enshrine good research practice as well as their local rules and practices.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Link&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Link=https://www.nrin.nl/wp-content/uploads/EnTIRE-WP5-Scenario-No.-1-From-D.5.4-final.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Related To&lt;br /&gt;
|Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:38cabc43-2b53-4c98-80ea-89b97ef5107d;Resource:55cea558-b370-4eec-b4f5-0de97f815e67;Resource:31097e7a-2080-4aee-b60d-e1e1a5b15888&lt;br /&gt;
|Related To Theme=Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e;Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db;Theme:A22bd155-7f88-4750-aa9c-cba9ad72cbec;Theme:13ae94da-15d6-426f-8f6e-9134fb57e267;Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0;Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3;Theme:9fc17763-af35-4688-a87f-165f3b120897;Theme:883697c8-d319-4224-991e-ce063d648efd;Theme:0953795c-fb38-4080-a56f-fe503c4875bd;Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108;Theme:4d29ae67-bee8-4203-b78f-320bc63025d0&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tags&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Virtue And Value=Fairness; Honesty; Respect; Responsibility&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Authorship; Publication Ethics; Plagiarism; Editorial review; Complaints procedure; Respect&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>0000-0002-0838-9626</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:B2456a64-b3e1-4d36-866e-a3ba117633e9&amp;diff=2794</id>
		<title>Resource:B2456a64-b3e1-4d36-866e-a3ba117633e9</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:B2456a64-b3e1-4d36-866e-a3ba117633e9&amp;diff=2794"/>
		<updated>2020-08-01T11:59:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;0000-0002-0838-9626: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Resource&lt;br /&gt;
|Resource Type=Cases&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's&lt;br /&gt;
|Is About=Scientific dishonesty in medical research has received increased attention over recent years. A survey among 274 medical scientists in Norway showed that 22% knew about cases of serious misconduct, and 3% were aware of falsification or fabrication of data. 9% of the respondents had themselves contributed to one or more incidents of misconduct&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nylenna, Magne, et al. &amp;quot;Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries.&amp;quot; ''The Lancet'' 354.9172 (1999): 57-61.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This is a factual anonymized case.&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Important Because=Committees were established by the national medical research councils in Denmark (1992), Norway (1994), and Sweden (1997), and by the Ministry of Education in Finland (1994), to deal with scientific misconduct - i.e, to initiate preventive measures, to investigate alleged cases, or both&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nylenna, Magne, et al. &amp;quot;Handling of scientific dishonesty in the Nordic countries.&amp;quot; ''The Lancet'' 354.9172 (1999): 57-61.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This article describes Nordic systems of handling misconduct allegations and investigations in the 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Important For=researchers; research leaders&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Link&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Link=https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(98)07133-5/fulltext&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Related To&lt;br /&gt;
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tags&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Timepoint=1992-1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Location=Norway; Finland; Sweden; Denmark&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Authorship; Ghost authorship&lt;br /&gt;
|Related To Research Area=Clinical Medicine&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>0000-0002-0838-9626</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:B11d68ed-00d6-4bdb-94a5-367c181cef92&amp;diff=2793</id>
		<title>Resource:B11d68ed-00d6-4bdb-94a5-367c181cef92</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:B11d68ed-00d6-4bdb-94a5-367c181cef92&amp;diff=2793"/>
		<updated>2020-08-01T11:46:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;0000-0002-0838-9626: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Resource&lt;br /&gt;
|Resource Type=Guidelines&lt;br /&gt;
|Title=Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity&lt;br /&gt;
|Is About=The aim of the Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity is to support knowledge about, acceptance and entrenchment of research integrity in the Estonian research community. The Code of Conduct for Research Integrity describes the conduct expected from researchers and the responsibility of research institutions in ensuring research integrity, thus contributing to the increase of credibility of research in the eyes of the individual and the public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.eetika.ee/sites/default/files/www_ut/hea_teadustava_eng_trukis.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Important Because=The Code of Conduct for Research Integrity is meant to complement the Code of Ethics of Estonian Scientists adopted in 2002. The new document is needed because the development of research has brought forth new themes and perspectives not reflected in the code of ethics, and added new points for consideration. The current document also places greater emphasis on the activities of research institutions, separately pointing out the responsibility of researchers and research institutions, which helps to emphasise that responsibility for ethical research lies with everyone who is active in research. Researchers alone cannot ensure research integrity. So that researchers could behave ethically, the necessary conditions have to be created at the level of the organisation and the system. The Code of Conduct for Research Integrity has been created as a framework document which provides guidelines to all Estonian research institutions and the researchers working there. The task of the research institution is to elaborate detailed procedural rules which help to increase awareness in the organisation about the principles of research integrity, to monitor the research environment and, if necessary, to interfere and to deal with the cases of misconduct. To ensure as equal treatment of members of different research institutions as possible, research institutions cooperate closely in drafting procedural rules and regulations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.eetika.ee/sites/default/files/www_ut/hea_teadustava_eng_trukis.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Important For=researchers&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Link&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Link=https://www.eetika.ee/sites/default/files/www_ut/hea_teadustava_eng_trukis.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Related To}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Tags&lt;br /&gt;
|Has Location=Estonia&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>0000-0002-0838-9626</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=User:0000-0002-0838-9626&amp;diff=2792</id>
		<title>User:0000-0002-0838-9626</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=User:0000-0002-0838-9626&amp;diff=2792"/>
		<updated>2020-08-01T11:44:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;0000-0002-0838-9626: create user page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{S_User | Thea |  Erika Löfström }}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>0000-0002-0838-9626</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>