https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=0000-0002-4296-011X 2026-05-25T00:34:06Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.11 https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:8221b7e8-d873-4c67-8576-c4f60247b5ac&diff=4541 2020-10-19T11:21:04Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Science Ethics Code of Hungarian Academy of Sciences<br /> |Is About=This set of guidelines from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences includes fundamental moral and ethical principles of scientific research, as well as more concrete and applied guidance on day-to-day matters of research like avoiding falsification, fabrication, plagiarism; fair authorship procedures; and reporting violations of ethical research practices.<br /> <br /> What sets this document apart from others is its extensive guidance for the nation's Science Ethics Committee that adjudicates and oversees investigations of ethics violations. Committee members are directed to issue consequence proportional to the &quot;seriousness&quot; of the act; to base their investigation on the principles of objectivity, completeness, and &quot;exact exploration;&quot; to maintain confidentiality; and to presume innocence.<br /> |Important Because=The guidelines offer both a justification of a code of scientific research ethics (because of the deep need for transparency, accountability, and honesty in scientific research), and concrete practices for researchers to follow. It also offers best practices for committees tasked with investigating ethics violations in the research community.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Ethics committee members<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://mta.hu/data/dokumentumok/english/background/Science_Ethics_Code_English.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To}}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Hungarian Academy of Sciences<br /> |Has Timepoint=2010<br /> |Has Location=Hungary<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Objectivity; Transparency; Diligence; Integrity<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Adherence to Regulations; Citing; Authorship; Data Management; Deception; Fabrication; Integrity; Investigation; Publication Ethics; Responding to Irresponsible Research Practices<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:8ac42d3d-e12a-45f3-9a6a-3ea2aa98954c&diff=4540 2020-10-19T11:14:36Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Cases<br /> |Title=Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America<br /> |Is About=This resource describes the broad range of allegations that can be made against researchers involved in human subjects research, through reference to case law from North America. They discuss the cases 1) Gelsinger v. Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, 2) Robertson v. McGee, and 3) Weiss v. Solomon. What unifies these cases is that, first, a wide range of defendants were named, including principal investigators, university trustees, hospital administration, and medical school leadership. Second, these cases utilized higher standards for researchers than the medical malpractice standards commonly used in clinical settings. Finally, the authors note that these three cases are unusual in that they were argued in court; the majority of research-related cases are settled prior to trial. The article concludes that, although limited, this body of case law informs researchers on specific areas of vulnerability and precautions they must take to minimize legal liability. <br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important Because=This resource is helpful for researchers interested in knowing their legal liability, the range of actors who may pursue legal action against them, and specific areas of practice where they may face lawsuits. It may also be helpful for researchers' legal representation as a way to begin familiarizing themselves with case law.&lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important For=researchers; Industry; Administrators; Research institutions; Universities<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-6-4<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Has Location=North America<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety; Informed consent<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:8ac42d3d-e12a-45f3-9a6a-3ea2aa98954c&diff=3939 2020-10-07T12:26:21Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Cases<br /> |Title=Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America<br /> |Is About=This resource describes the broad range of allegations that can be made against researchers involved in human subjects research, through reference to case law from North America. Specific allegations discussed include lawsuits based on conflicts of interest and lawsuits based on principles of international human rights. The case concludes that, while many lawsuits have been settled out of court, there is a limited body of case law that informs researchers on specific areas of vulnerability and precautions they must take to minimize legal liability. <br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important Because=This resource is helpful for researchers interested in knowing their legal liability, the range of actors who may pursue legal action against them, and specific areas of practice where they may face lawsuits. It may also be helpful for researchers' legal representation as a way to begin familiarizing themselves with case law.&lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important For=researchers; Industry; Administrators; Research institutions; Universities<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-6-4<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Has Location=North America<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety; Informed consent<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:8ac42d3d-e12a-45f3-9a6a-3ea2aa98954c&diff=3938 2020-10-07T12:24:25Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Cases<br /> |Title=Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America<br /> |Is About=This resource describes the broad range of allegations that can be made against researchers, through reference to case law from North America. Specific allegations discussed include conflicts of interest and lawsuits based on principles of international human rights.<br /> &lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important Because=This resource is helpful for researchers interested in knowing their legal liability, the range of actors who may pursue legal action against them, and specific areas of practice where they may face lawsuits.&lt;references /&gt;<br /> |Important For=researchers; Industry; Administrators; Research institutions; Universities<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6939-6-4<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:D44fd22a-ed5d-4120-a78b-8881747131fd<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Has Location=North America<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Patient safety; Informed consent<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:6b80ac06-85e5-4950-b56d-368bb16ff93b&diff=3919 2020-10-04T09:51:18Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=The Code of the National Science Centre on Research Integrity and Applying for Research Financing<br /> |Is About=The National Science Centre of Poland proposed a Code to govern research integrity and applications for research funding. The Code proposes multiple methods of operationalizing principles of integrity throughout the research process, from conception to publication. It also advocates for teaching, training, and supervision as fundamental ways of ensuring research integrity. Finally, the Code spells out possible ways it can be violated, and mechanisms of enforcement including penalties and sanctions from the National Science Centre.<br /> |Important Because=Researchers operating in Poland have a responsibility to read and understand the Code prior to embarking on research operations. More broadly, the Code is applicable to individuals and institutions interested in 1) how to train others in practices and cultures of research integrity, 2) how to implement enforcement mechanisms and sanctions, both through restrictions to funding and through re-training of individuals.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Administrators; Funders; PI; Research institutions; Research funding organisations<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://ncn.gov.pl/sites/default/files/pliki/Code-of-the-National-Science-Centre-on-Research-Integrity.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To}}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=National Science Centre<br /> |Has Timepoint=2016<br /> |Has Location=Poland<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Integrity; Responsibility; Transparency<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Adherence to Regulations; Allegation of Misconduct; Misconduct Investigations; Research Misconduct Investigation<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:8221b7e8-d873-4c67-8576-c4f60247b5ac&diff=3918 2020-10-04T09:43:07Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Science Ethics Code of Hungarian Academy of Sciences<br /> |Is About=This set of guidelines from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences includes fundamental moral and ethical principles of scientific research, as well as more concrete and applied guidance on day-to-day matters of research like avoiding falsification, fabrication, plagiarism; fair authorship procedures; and reporting violations of ethical research practices. The document also contains information about the Science Ethics Committee that adjudicates and oversees investigations of ethics violations.<br /> |Important Because=The guidelines offer both a justification of a code of scientific research ethics (because of the deep need for transparency, accountability, and honesty in scientific research), and concrete practices for researchers to follow. It also offers best practices for committees tasked with investigating ethics violations in the research community.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Ethics committee members<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://mta.hu/data/dokumentumok/english/background/Science_Ethics_Code_English.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To}}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Hungarian Academy of Sciences<br /> |Has Timepoint=2010<br /> |Has Location=Hungary<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Objectivity; Transparency; Diligence; Integrity<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Adherence to Regulations; Citing; Authorship; Data Management; Deception; Fabrication; Integrity; Investigation; Publication Ethics; Responding to Irresponsible Research Practices<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:F9ca81aa-faf1-4182-9f14-bddad81900bd&diff=3917 2020-10-04T08:52:43Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Professional Ethics and Code of Conduct for National Natural Science Foundation of China<br /> |Is About=In 2009, the National Natural Science Foundation of China introduced standards of professional ethics and a code of conduct for its members, funders, and governors. It developed these standards to ensure the fair and impartial distribution of resources to research programs. The standards include concrete guidelines on application review, confidentiality, and project management. It also includes guidelines for individual comportment, laying out professional duties and virtues (e.g. self-discipline and honesty) for members.<br /> |Important Because=As indicated in an interview following the guidelines, these standards are relevant to funding organizations for several reasons. The foundation intended to create a culture of fairness and honesty that preserved the public trust in its findings. It also created the guidelines to create concrete policy for managing an increasing quantity of funds.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Administrators; Funders; Research funding organisations<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=http://www.ircip.cn/web/1044764-1044764.html?id=26645&amp;newsid=1453845<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To}}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Ministry of Science and Technology<br /> |Has Timepoint=2019; 2009<br /> |Has Location=China<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Confidentiality; Fairness; Dignity; Integrity; Neutrality; Self-discipline; Trustworthiness<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Integrity; Perverse incentives; Professional standards<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=User:0000-0002-4296-011X&diff=3916 2020-10-04T08:09:51Z

<p>0000-0002-4296-011X: create user page</p> <hr /> <div>{{S_User | Apoorva | Rangan }}</div>

0000-0002-4296-011X