https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=0000-0002-5130-267X 2026-04-15T06:58:09Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.11 https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:6cd2231c-fec8-447f-b623-62b663a2c507&diff=3049 2020-08-20T08:07:04Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=Academic Integrity Tutorial with Quiz<br /> |Is About=This online tutorial provides an overview of the importance of academic integrity. Participants will have the opportunity to learn strategies of how to identify plagiarism, conduct academic research, and properly cite citations.<br /> |Important Because=Research integrity issues have to be dealt with at an early stage of a researchers career. This tutorial is a useful and fun way to address this topic.<br /> |Important For=Early career researchers; PhD Students<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.umuc.edu/current-students/learning-resources/academic-integrity/tutorial/interactive.html<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434;Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=University of Maryland<br /> |Has Location=United States<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Plagiarism; Citing<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:04626b0f-c807-4d08-95fd-2a984dfbf1ae&diff=3048 2020-08-20T08:02:49Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement<br /> |Is About=This document presents the Bonn PRINTEGER Consensus Statement: Working with Research Integrity - Guidance for research performing organisations. The aim of the statement is to complement existing instruments by focusing specifically on institutional responsibilities for strengthening integrity. It takes into account the daily challenges and organisational contexts of most researchers. The statement intends to make research integrity challenges recognisable from the work-floor perspective, providing concrete advice on organisational measures to strengthen integrity.<br /> |Important Because=This document emphasises that responsibility for ethical research lies with everyone who is active in research, but especially with leaders in research performing organisations. Researchers’ morals alone cannot ensure research integrity; good conditions for exercising integrity must also be created at the level of the organisation and the research system.<br /> |Important For=Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-018-0034-4<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434;Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e;Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb;Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab;Theme:0953795c-fb38-4080-a56f-fe503c4875bd<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=PRINTEGER<br /> |Has Timepoint=2018<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Respect; Transparency; Fairness; Collegiality<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Whistleblowing; Research Misconduct; Research Integrity<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:E7b73b56-7c6f-4e0c-a1cb-9c74c8e56f79&diff=3047 2020-08-20T07:58:27Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK<br /> |Is About=In 2013, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics embarked upon a series of engagement activities that aimed to inform and advance debate about the ethical consequences of the culture of scientific research in terms of encouraging good research practice and the production of high quality science. A wealth of information has been gathered during the project from the hundreds of scientists and others who took part. It is the people engaged in scientific research who are in the best position to tell what it is like to be a researcher, whether a post-doctoral researcher on a shortterm contract, or a well-established professor.<br /> |Important Because=The project highlights that all those involved in the practice of scientific research play a role in shaping its culture, and therefore all should take responsibility for building a culture conducive to high quality, ethical and valuable research.<br /> |Important For=Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/the-culture-of-scientific-research<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109;Resource:Dc1f1e11-fe21-4e8b-aa7d-c4938e74a197;Resource:7cf08223-5220-4155-b5a6-e908b64f1866;Resource:E7b73b56-7c6f-4e0c-a1cb-9c74c8e56f79;Resource:2b78e1bc-2187-4569-95fa-49468d5b5385;Resource:216fd809-8eca-4f5e-8cc7-c118b9bfb0cd;Resource:6de4eccb-1e56-46a9-b276-a45661b62e26<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:B2331451-5a6a-4aa2-a3d5-c68d2c96c8e1;Theme:66ccb878-3c99-4e54-931d-d718bc0cb246;Theme:A612e3c5-4f31-470f-b5bf-3751923848e8<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Nuffield Council on Bioethics<br /> |Has Timepoint=2014<br /> |Has Location=UK<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Integrity<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Dc1f1e11-fe21-4e8b-aa7d-c4938e74a197&diff=3046 2020-08-20T07:42:22Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations<br /> |Is About=This booklet is based on actual research practice, in other words the problems and choices that arise during the various phases of a scientific study. This involves designing the experiment, collecting data, analysing and reporting the results, and the way those results are used.<br /> |Important Because=increased competition in science can make it tempting to let personal interests prevail above the interests of science.This booklet is intended to encourage discussion of various issues so as to contribute to deliberate, responsible decision-making. The key question is always how one should act correctly from the point of view of science and responsibly from the point of view of ethics when designing, carrying out, and reporting on scientific research.<br /> |Important For=Bachelor students; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Graduate students; High school students; Master students; PhD Students; Postdocs; Undergraduate students<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.knaw.nl/shared/resources/actueel/publicaties/pdf/knawdilemmasandtemptations.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109;Resource:F68f2226-005e-4321-b2a4-fc541fdf6c8d;Resource:81e37946-13e7-46e9-828e-2d6670b68656;Resource:7e48f25a-f1de-4ee8-b04f-aabdae84a933;Resource:A0df9be7-401a-43ba-af41-245019119182<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c;Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e;Theme:F3ddbf9b-e3c4-47b7-97cd-6239ce7a32c3;Theme:72c8ab8d-bbf8-4503-8b48-9de7eac37673<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=KNAW Netherlands<br /> |Has Timepoint=2005<br /> |Has Location=The Netherlands<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability; Care; Collegiality<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Scientific Misdonduct; Authorship<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:0927a980-ae4c-4186-b85d-a3a9f8aceddc&diff=3045 2020-08-20T07:09:53Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report<br /> |Is About=This report, sponsored by IAC (Inter-Academy Council) and IAP (the global network of science academies), represents the first joint effort by the scientific academies to provide clarity and advice in forging an international consensus on responsible conduct in the global research enterprise. It acknowledges and draws on information and recommendations from the many national and international organizations that have issued guidelines and statements on the basic responsibilities and obligations of researchers.<br /> |Important Because=The report serves as a guide to basic values that govern the conduct of research and the communication of research results and recommends specific actions that should be used to ensure and maintain the integrity of research. It forges an international consensus on responsible conduct in the global research enterprise.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.interacademies.org/33362/Responsible-Conduct-in-the-Global-Research-Enterprise<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:C37b2d3c-bd0c-443f-a646-cd814c8ee4af;Resource:00b8b870-5d40-4bca-ad70-7f0f8e598de4<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=IAP; IAC<br /> |Has Timepoint=2012<br /> |Has Location=Italy; The Netherlands<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Honesty; Respect; Reliability; Fairness; Objectivity; Skepticism; Openness<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Responsible research<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:232ffbe0-b7fb-4d04-b605-493e10bc04c6&diff=3044 2020-08-20T07:05:36Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=Research Data Management<br /> |Is About=The University of Edinburghs Research Data Service provides a suite of tools and support that helps staff and students be effective with their research data before, during and after their project.<br /> |Important Because=Sharing and responsibly managing data produced or re-used in a research project is required by funders and publishers, and supports open scholarship. The outcomes of good RDM are that the rights of data subjects/owners are protected and that data is archived towards the end of research so that it remains available for validation of results, and potentially for future re-use. Together with Open Access publishing and other Open things such as Open Source software, managing and providing access to your research data contributes to the modern goal of Open Research/Scholarship/ Science.  <br /> |Important For=Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.ed.ac.uk/information-services/research-support/research-data-service<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:9c917ab2-c01d-446b-89c1-a9cd415afb00;Resource:695b5c9b-f3ac-4fc8-8e20-1dfd5f7347ff;Resource:Aaf0b2a8-ff3a-478f-9d1c-94466cfb1bda;Resource:B47afc7d-44d6-4713-a209-953d58e81778<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:0bd48e3b-3590-44ae-a21b-7cf2b425d6cb;Theme:61d9a3f5-8f8b-4f6f-8363-fa53f959f131<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=University of Edinburgh<br /> |Has Location=United Kingdom<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Data Management; Data Issues; Data sharing<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:E8743444-88e1-46a7-a1c0-25ca501c0886&diff=3043 2020-08-20T07:01:52Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Recommendations for the investigation of research misconduct<br /> |Is About=The European Network of Research Integrity Offices (ENRIO) Handbook is a set of recommendations or things to consider regarding how to deal with research misconduct and how to protect those involved in the investigation based on experiences and lessons learned by member organizations within ENRIO, allowing for local or national differences in its implementation.<br /> |Important Because=While the European Code of Conduct is focused on research integrity (RI) in a broader sense, this ENRIO Handbook aims to offer further specifics on section 3.2 of the Code “Dealing with Violations and Allegations of Misconduct”. The Handbook consists of detailed practical recommendations on how to deal with research misconduct and other unacceptable practices.<br /> <br /> On the European level, research integrity is much more on the agenda compared to 10-15 years ago. This leaves room for soft harmonization which is one of the main purposes of this Handbook.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; ENRIO member organisations<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=http://www.enrio.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb;Resource:F68f2226-005e-4321-b2a4-fc541fdf6c8d;Resource:Acc068ac-a0c0-48fa-b6a2-ff7448bf2573;Resource:60bf1373-f7e1-4831-b3e9-cf6e60cc290f<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:65e6f304-51e2-4e41-93d3-e48518248b39;Theme:0953795c-fb38-4080-a56f-fe503c4875bd;Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=ENRIO; ALLEA; EUREC<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Transparency<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Misconduct; Research Integrity<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Aaf0b2a8-ff3a-478f-9d1c-94466cfb1bda&diff=3042 2020-08-20T06:48:23Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=NTU Research Data Policy<br /> |Is About=The Nanyang Technological University Singapore (NTU) Research Data Policy gives detailed advice on how to manage data I research (e.g. ownership DMP, sharing etc.) and what important roles and responsibilities are.<br /> |Important Because=There is an increasing emphasis on managing and sharing research data. This guide will help researchers learn more about the various aspects of research data management and sharing. It will also guide NTU researchers in meeting the university as well as funders’ requirements.<br /> <br /> Research data is an important component of research. It has evidentiary value which is essential to ascertaining the integrity of research. Good stewardship of research data can bring many benefits to the researchers as well as their institutions. The success of your research project depends on how well you manage your data throughout the lifecycle of your research.<br /> |Important For=Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://research.ntu.edu.sg/rieo/RI/Pages/Research-Data-Policies.aspx<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:9c917ab2-c01d-446b-89c1-a9cd415afb00;Resource:695b5c9b-f3ac-4fc8-8e20-1dfd5f7347ff;Resource:232ffbe0-b7fb-4d04-b605-493e10bc04c6<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:0bd48e3b-3590-44ae-a21b-7cf2b425d6cb;Theme:88b73549-fec0-4fb9-99f6-fe1055d6b76a;Theme:61d9a3f5-8f8b-4f6f-8363-fa53f959f131<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=NTU Singapore<br /> |Has Location=Singapore<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Ownership; Data Management; Data sharing; Data Issues<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb&diff=2967 2020-08-14T09:46:00Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Research integrity and research misconduct policy<br /> |Is About=The policy outlines requirements for institutions, and individuals engaged in Australian Research Council (ARC) business, to report to the ARC research integrity matters, and the action the ARC may take in response to reported breaches of the Code. It also describes how the ARC can refer concerns or complaints to research institutions, who, in accordance with the Code, are responsible for managing and investigating potential breaches of the Code.<br /> |Important Because=The purpose of this policy is to promote and support research integrity and safeguard confidence in the value of publicly funded research by:<br /> <br /> -  making transparent the ARC’s role in ensuring research integrity and addressing breaches of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018) (the Code);<br /> <br /> -  establishing a framework to support the integrity of the ARC’s grant application, peer review, grant selection and research evaluation processes, funding decisions and research; and<br /> <br /> -  raising awareness of the importance of research integrity and the possible consequences for research institutions and individuals if appropriate standards are not maintained.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.arc.gov.au/policies-strategies/strategy/arc-research-integrity-and-research-misconduct-policy<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Australian research council<br /> |Has Timepoint=2019<br /> |Has Location=Australia<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Integrity<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:366d47ee-4b9d-4287-8c57-88ba847480bb&diff=2966 2020-08-14T09:45:35Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=Research integrity and research misconduct policy<br /> |Is About=The policy outlines requirements for institutions, and individuals engaged in Australian Research Council (ARC) business, to report to the ARC research integrity matters, and the action the ARC may take in response to reported breaches of the Code. It also describes how the ARC can refer concerns or complaints to research institutions, who, in accordance with the Code, are responsible for managing and investigating potential breaches of the Code.<br /> |Important Because=The purpose of this policy is to promote and support research integrity and safeguard confidence in the value of publicly funded research by:<br /> <br /> -  making transparent the ARC’s role in ensuring research integrity and addressing breaches of the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2018) (the Code);<br /> <br /> -  establishing a framework to support the integrity of the ARC’s grant application, peer review, grant selection and research evaluation processes, funding decisions and research; and<br /> <br /> -  raising awareness of the importance of research integrity and the possible consequences for research institutions and individuals if appropriate standards are not maintained.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research; Policy makers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.arc.gov.au/policies-strategies/strategy/arc-research-integrity-and-research-misconduct-policy<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Australian research council<br /> |Has Timepoint=2019<br /> |Has Location=Australia<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research Integrity<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:6de4eccb-1e56-46a9-b276-a45661b62e26&diff=2965 2020-08-14T09:28:42Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Guidelines<br /> |Title=RCUK Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct<br /> |Is About=The Research Councils UK (RCUK) Policy and Guidelines builds on growing national and international experience in identifying and promoting good research conduct, and in addressing unsatisfactory conduct. In particular this document:<br /> <br /> *sets standards of good research practice, with associated guidelines<br /> *specifies and describes unacceptable research conduct<br /> *provides guidelines for reporting and investigating allegations of research misconduct<br /> *clarifies the respective responsibilities of the Research Councils and Research Organisations in fostering and safeguarding the highest possible standards of research conduct<br /> |Important Because=A commitment to good research conduct lies at the heart of an effective research system. High standards of research integrity underpin the quality and reliability of the research outcomes generated and of decisions made in the light of those outcomes.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Academic staff; Administrators<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/reviews/grc/rcuk-grp-policy-and-guidelines-updated-apr-17-2-pdf/<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e;Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:3b5cfd90-972a-4d17-accd-395b6cec560d<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Research Council UK<br /> |Has Timepoint=2017<br /> |Has Location=United Kingdom<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Responsible research<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:F68f2226-005e-4321-b2a4-fc541fdf6c8d&diff=2964 2020-08-14T09:20:25Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Other<br /> |Title=Institutional dealing with scientific misconduct<br /> |Is About=In this article three categories of causal factors are distinguished: Deceit as an individual vice, an existing culture of sloppiness and irresponsibility within certain disciplines or institutes, and the pernicious influence of today’s research climate with its pressure for production and the ‘metrification’ of performance and output. Suggestions for dealing with cases of misconduct, resulting from these three distinct views, are presented and discussed.<br /> |Important Because=The promotion of a culture of scientific integrity and the furthering of responsible research by their employees deserve a high priority within universities and research institutes. Proper disciplinary actions and preventive measures should be based on an analysis of the possible motives and causes underlying such misbehaviour.<br /> |Important For=Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=http://eruditio.worldacademy.org/files/issue-6/reprints/ej-v1-i6-institutional-dealing-pdrenth-reprint.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:F68f2226-005e-4321-b2a4-fc541fdf6c8d;Resource:45af2d0e-4238-4d3b-8431-9b7682eb9691;Resource:A9e1f468-b56b-4ae5-91fe-20024d43e154<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:13ae94da-15d6-426f-8f6e-9134fb57e267;Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=ALLEA; Pieter J. D. Drenth<br /> |Has Timepoint=2015<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Scientific Misdonduct<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:C2463c3c-c2d8-4884-8f7a-84b4d7d4cb3b&diff=2961 2020-08-14T08:51:11Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Other<br /> |Title=Research Integrity Practices in Science Europe Member Organizations<br /> |Is About=This report presents the results of a survey of Scientific Europe member organisations, undertaken in 2014 by the Working Group on Research Integrity. It maps existing policies, procedures and practices for promoting research integrity and builds upon this to make a number of key recommendations for improving research integrity including processes and policies, awareness raising, training, and collaboration.<br /> |Important Because=Research integrity is at the core of the research endeavour. It is the basis for researchers’ trust in each other and in the research record and, equally importantly, society’s trust in research. There are many reasons to take research integrity seriously including research excellence and an unsullied research record; continuing societal support for public investment in research; avoiding harmful impacts and research waste etc. <br /> <br /> Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity (2015), Seven Reasons to Care about Research Integrity: &lt;nowiki&gt;http://scieur.org/integrity&lt;/nowiki&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;br /&gt;<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Science-_Europe_Integrity_Survey_Report_July_2016_FINAL.pdf<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01;Resource:60bf1373-f7e1-4831-b3e9-cf6e60cc290f<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab;Theme:Fe62e07c-2e75-4a55-82e6-1908fa543b7a<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Science Europe<br /> |Has Timepoint=2016<br /> |Has Location=Europe<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Reliability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Whistleblowers; Sanctions; Collaborative science; Self-assessment; Research Misconduct; Authorship; Conflict of Interest; Bias; Supervision; Environment<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:88513307-bcc4-4797-8960-4d63bb5aea7f&diff=2960 2020-08-14T08:41:28Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=Research Integrity: Podcast Series<br /> |Is About=This ia a series of lectures looking at different aspects of research integrity and their application in biomedical research.<br /> |Important Because=Research Integrity (RI) is an integral part of researchers' everyday work. Besides papers and books this podcast series provide a new and motivating way to talk and learn about the topic.<br /> |Important For=Bachelor students; Graduate students; PhD Students; Early career researchers; Junior researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://podcasts.ox.ac.uk/series/research-integrity<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:D379e46d-87d3-4e28-891b-c47d5c905f79;Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e;Resource:Fd9bacbe-8ea2-47eb-bdf0-8833988c0907;Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=University of Oxford<br /> |Has Timepoint=2011<br /> |Has Location=United Kingdom<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability; Respect; Reliability; Responsibility<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Publication ethics; Data management; Research misconduct; Questionable research practice<br /> |Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Af2f0202-71bd-4cf4-9213-8fb255e1674c&diff=2958 2020-08-14T08:35:34Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Cases<br /> |Title=Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance<br /> |Is About=The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case.<br /> |Important Because=There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Journal publishers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/research-ethics-zero-tolerance-1.9756<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:1e1d90cf-ca7e-45d6-b9ba-c5e4791f6e8a<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=He Haibo; Li Lianda; Yang Wei<br /> |Has Timepoint=2008<br /> |Has Location=China<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Falsification; Plagiarism<br /> |Related To Research Area=Clinical medicine<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:7f74bb57-6b93-4430-a3c7-923e5428aa4e&diff=2957 2020-08-14T08:30:09Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=Ethics defined: a glossary<br /> |Is About=This glossary aims at providing common ground for enlightened conversation in the realm of ethics and leadership. More than 50 animated two-minute videos define key ethics terms and behavioral ethics concepts.<br /> |Important Because=The complex and important topic of ethics that is crucial for researchers' everyday work is broken down to short videos. Those can be used to educate yourself or for training. Because everybody has different opinions, perspectives and experiences, talking about ethics and defining key terms is important.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research; Bachelor students; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; High school students; Master students<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:6f86286f-e078-48ae-915d-33fa0702d502;Resource:Ad7f9f5c-a519-4744-a7c6-5fba091e9264<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d;Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108<br /> |Related To Instruction=Instruction:2120c9fc-8309-47b4-baea-25446f32817f<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Mc Combs school of Business, Texas<br /> |Has Location=United States<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Moral reasoning<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:0bae8e4a-a4be-4f3f-89f2-65a3b8cc3395&diff=2949 2020-08-14T07:21:38Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=Fostering Integrity in Research<br /> |Is About=The 1992 report ''Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process'' evaluates issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provides a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades.<br /> |Important Because=The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21896/fostering-integrity-in-research<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434;Resource:0bae8e4a-a4be-4f3f-89f2-65a3b8cc3395;Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109;Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e;Resource:1e1d90cf-ca7e-45d6-b9ba-c5e4791f6e8a<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:520b3bc7-a6ab-4617-95f2-89c9dee31c53<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=The National acadamies of sciences, engineering and medicine<br /> |Has Timepoint=2017<br /> |Has Location=United States<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Accountability<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research misconduct; Questionable research practice; Data management; Mentor/trainee relationship; Authorship; Peer review; Research with Humans; Research with Animals; Safety; Conflict of interest<br /> |Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences; PE - Physical Sciences and Engineering<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434&diff=2948 2020-08-14T07:19:12Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Education<br /> |Title=ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics<br /> |Is About=The manual is a resource for both researchers designing or attempting to design research, as well as professionals evaluating that research. It offers tools for practical guidance for researchers, research ethics committees and research integrity offices.<br /> |Important Because=ENERI is a project that aims to improve the exchange between experts in the fields of research ethics and research integrity. The manual offers guidance for both fields. It is a living resource, inviting engagement rather than consumption. It contains no technical or technocratic instruction, but rather seeks to instill deliberation around issues of research ethics and research integrity.<br /> |Important For=All stakeholders in research; Researchers<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=http://eneri.eu/e-manual/<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:7f74bb57-6b93-4430-a3c7-923e5428aa4e;Resource:6f86286f-e078-48ae-915d-33fa0702d502;Resource:0b13a753-8e50-4b1a-975b-8ef65cd7e962;Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109;Resource:Db4c2416-1ce5-44ca-8306-20de0d1d890e;Resource:5bbdd729-8f96-432a-a0ee-56510e343d01<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d;Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=ENERI<br /> |Has Location=Europe<br /> |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Research misconduct; Questionable research practice; Falsification; Fabrication; Plagiarism; Social responsibilities; Peer review; Authorship<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:Fd9bacbe-8ea2-47eb-bdf0-8833988c0907&diff=2931 2020-08-12T08:13:58Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Other<br /> |Title=Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it<br /> |Is About=Science Europe published a comprehensive review of developments in research integrity across Europe and the US. Research integrity is about &quot;the performance of research to the highest standards of professionalism and rigour, in an ethically robust manner&quot;, says the report.<br /> |Important Because=The report argues that research integrity is vital because it creates trust, and trust is at the heart of the research process. Researchers must be able to trust each other's work, and &quot;they must also be trusted by society since they provide scientific expertise that may impact people's lives&quot;. As the report's conclusions highlight, &quot;research integrity has the potential to increase the quality of research in the European research ecosystem, thereby increasing its overall effectiveness and impact into the future&quot;. The inclusion by Science Europe members of research integrity amongst their core priorities shows their commitment to addressing the challenge.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Postdocs<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://phys.org/news/2015-12-integritywhat-important.html<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434;Resource:D379e46d-87d3-4e28-891b-c47d5c905f79;Resource:25be9b69-4809-4c8d-881a-4c75fc50e02f;Resource:Cfc3db56-7a32-4f2d-8485-2f14a12c7109<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:8c79e235-8481-45ea-bb57-c744dedbbb8a;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab;Theme:0953795c-fb38-4080-a56f-fe503c4875bd;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab<br /> |Related To Instruction=Instruction:C51a36cc-7c58-4740-99cd-cd596c210464;Instruction:459e908a-46b9-471c-a21e-4c3cca1963c9;Instruction:F2e6930f-933f-4ddf-b3e6-94339c610268<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=Science Europe<br /> |Has Location=Europe<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Trustworthiness<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:6f86286f-e078-48ae-915d-33fa0702d502&diff=2930 2020-08-12T07:52:54Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Other<br /> |Title=Research Ethics<br /> |Is About=Ethical research conduct implies the application of fundamental ethical principles and legislation to scientific research in all possible domains of research – for example biomedical research, nature sciences, social sciences and humanities. The ethics review procedure of the EC including ethics screening and ethics assessment is explained.<br /> |Important Because=For all activities funded by the European Union, ethics is an integral part of research from beginning to end, and ethical compliance is seen as pivotal to achieve real research excellence. It is only by getting the ethics right that research excellence can be achieved.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; Doctoral students; All stakeholders in research<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/index.cfm?pg=policy&amp;lib=ethics<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:B4667c43-18b8-4c99-86ff-18fa458759ec;Resource:7f74bb57-6b93-4430-a3c7-923e5428aa4e;Resource:Ad7f9f5c-a519-4744-a7c6-5fba091e9264;Resource:Fd6e5aee-0aca-4fc2-854a-5fed52f2641a;Resource:887faa17-01f0-43b4-acde-a610054581c4;Resource:F7ed25ad-cfab-4040-b52f-596accc3c317<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d;Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=European Commission<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Honesty; Reliability<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=Resource:6f86286f-e078-48ae-915d-33fa0702d502&diff=2929 2020-08-12T07:28:44Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Resource<br /> |Resource Type=Other<br /> |Title=Research Ethics<br /> |Is About=Ethical research conduct implies the application of fundamental ethical principles and legislation to scientific research in all possible domains of research – for example biomedical research, nature sciences, social sciences and humanities. The ethics review procedure of the EC including ethics screening and ethics assessment is explained<br /> |Important Because=For all activities funded by the European Union, ethics is an integral part of research from beginning to end, and ethical compliance is seen as pivotal to achieve real research excellence. It is only by getting the ethics right that research excellence can be achieved.<br /> |Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; Doctoral students<br /> }}<br /> {{Link<br /> |Has Link=https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/index.cfm?pg=policy&amp;lib=ethics<br /> }}<br /> {{Related To<br /> |Related To Resource=Resource:B4667c43-18b8-4c99-86ff-18fa458759ec;Resource:7f74bb57-6b93-4430-a3c7-923e5428aa4e;Resource:Ad7f9f5c-a519-4744-a7c6-5fba091e9264;Resource:Fd6e5aee-0aca-4fc2-854a-5fed52f2641a<br /> |Related To Theme=Theme:B4f3369c-e0ac-4cf5-acd9-cb2a6c11181d;Theme:9ac8c1db-f98b-41ee-858d-a8c93a647108;Theme:B14a910a-3bc4-40ff-a0e6-eb7119f51ed9<br /> }}<br /> {{Tags<br /> |Involves=European Commission<br /> |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Honesty; Reliability<br /> }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X https://embassy.science:443/wiki-wiki/index.php?title=User:0000-0002-5130-267X&diff=2923 2020-08-11T09:44:38Z

<p>0000-0002-5130-267X: create user page</p> <hr /> <div>{{S_User | Renate | Klar }}</div>

0000-0002-5130-267X