The Embassy of Good Science - Recent changes [en]

Resource:16b760ab-052e-423c-b924-951af867d268

0000-0003-4416-1351 — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 12:20:56 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=Good Scientific Practice Guidelines (Österreichische Agentur für wissenschaftliche Integrität (ÖAWI), 2026) |Is About=The 2026..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=Good Scientific Practice Guidelines (Österreichische Agentur für wissenschaftliche Integrität (ÖAWI), 2026)
|Is About=The 2026 Guideline on Good Scientific Practice published by the Austrian Agency for Research Integrity (ÖAWI) establishes the principles, standards, and institutional responsibilities that promote integrity in research and teaching in Austria. It applies to all stages of the research process from the initial idea and study design to data management, publication, peer review, supervision, and communication of research findings. The guideline is based on four core principles: reliability, honesty, respect, and responsibility, aligning with the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA, 2023).

The document defines best practices for conducting research, managing research data, determining authorship, collaborating across institutions, and carrying out fair peer review. It also provides updated guidance on the responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that researchers remain accountable for AI-assisted work and must disclose its use where appropriate. Additionally, the guideline identifies forms of research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, misuse of AI, ghostwriting, and unethical authorship practices. Finally, it outlines the responsibilities of research institutions to provide training, establish research ethics structures, support research data management, and ensure fair procedures for investigating suspected misconduct.
|Important Because=This guideline is important because it provides a comprehensive framework for ensuring trust, quality, and accountability in scientific research. It establishes clear principles and standards that support responsible research conduct, helping researchers produce reliable, transparent, and ethically sound results while protecting participants, collaborators, and society. The guideline also addresses emerging challenges by providing recommendations for the responsible and transparent use of artificial intelligence in research. Beyond individual researchers, it supports institutions by promoting education, mentoring, research ethics, effective research data management, and fair procedures for addressing allegations of misconduct. Together, these measures foster a culture of integrity, prevent unethical research practices, strengthen institutional responsibility, and enhance public confidence in science by promoting consistent standards of excellence across research and higher education institutions.<div><div></div></div>
|Important For=Early Career Researcher; Researchers; Students; Policy Maker / Regulator; Journal Editor
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://zenodo.org/records/21256974
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags
|Involves=Österreichische Agentur für wissenschaftliche Integrität (ÖAWI)
|Has Timepoint=2026
}}

Resource:H5P-638

WikiSysop — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:05:06 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Interactive |Title=Emilio Beladiez's interview |Is About= |Tag= }}"

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Interactive
|Title=Emilio Beladiez's interview
|Is About=
|Tag=
}}

Resource:H5P-637

WikiSysop — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:05:05 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Interactive |Title=Dave Wall's interview_Re4Green |Is About= |Tag= }}"

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Interactive
|Title=Dave Wall's interview_Re4Green
|Is About=
|Tag=
}}

Resource:H5P-636

WikiSysop — Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:05:04 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Interactive |Title=Amber Wutich's interview |Is About= |Tag= }}"

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Interactive
|Title=Amber Wutich's interview
|Is About=
|Tag=
}}

Resource:B47afc7d-44d6-4713-a209-953d58e81778

0009-0008-2984-078X — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:14:44 GMT

User:0009-0008-2984-078X

0009-0008-2984-078X — Tue, 14 Jul 2026 09:12:49 GMT

create user page

New page

Hello World

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:36 GMT

Changed redirect target from 5me6j =5me6j to Hello World

X2m3z

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:34 GMT

Redirected page to Hello World

New page

#REDIRECT [[Hello World]]

7yzyt =7yzyt

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:34 GMT

Redirected page to Hello World

New page

#REDIRECT [[Hello World]]

Bhiaq*/bhiaq

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:34 GMT

Redirected page to Hello World

New page

#REDIRECT [[Hello World]]

4gdvq"4gdvq

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:34 GMT

Redirected page to Hello World

New page

#REDIRECT [[Hello World]]

Hello World

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:33 GMT

Changed redirect target from Hello World to Hello World

Wsydrwsydr"wsydrwsydr =wsydr

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:17 GMT

Redirected page to Hello World

New page

#REDIRECT [[Hello World]]

Hello World

172.18.0.3 — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 07:29:16 GMT

Changed redirect target from Hello World to Hello World

Resource:40b47110-e099-4b8f-bf8f-f3849b82e434

0009-0000-3200-3626 — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:19:20 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Education |Title=CHANGER training on Gene Editing in Research explores emerging ethical challenges in Gene Therapy |Has Related Initiative=Initiative..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Education
|Title=CHANGER training on Gene Editing in Research explores emerging ethical challenges in Gene Therapy
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:Df0d11b5-2efa-4b58-b94f-6845c6e83b11
|Is About=On 8 June 2026, the CHANGER Project successfully delivered its second online training session as part of the Intensive Course for the Framework Programme ethics appraisal scheme. The session, titled ''Gene Editing in Research'', brought together participants from across the research ethics community to explore recent developments in gene therapy and the challenges these innovations pose for research ethics review.

The interactive training provided participants with a comprehensive overview of gene editing technologies, including the distinction between germline and somatic gene editing, and examined the current legal and regulatory landscape, with a particular focus on the European context. Discussions also addressed key ethical considerations surrounding gene therapy, including questions of equity and fairness, the assessment of risks and benefits, and the complexities of obtaining meaningful informed consent in rapidly evolving areas of biomedical research.

An important part of the session was dedicated to understanding the patient perspective, highlighting the experiences, expectations and concerns of individuals and communities affected by gene therapy developments.

To encourage practical application of the concepts discussed, the training concluded with a case-study exercise. Participants worked in breakout groups to analyse a research protocol involving gene therapy, identify potential ethical issues, and reflect on the role of research ethics committees in evaluating such proposals. The exercise stimulated lively discussion and provided valuable insights into the challenges of reviewing cutting-edge research involving gene editing technologies.

The recording of the training session is now available online, together with the presentations delivered by the speakers:

* Watch the training video: https://youtu.be/n5Tnfodtfk4
* Download the presentations: [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/02.-Pascal-Borry_gene-editing-general-introduction.pdf Pascal Borry_gene editing general introduction], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/03.-Margaux-Reckelbus_Gene-therapy-legal-landscape.pdf Margaux Reckelbus_Gene therapy legal landscape,] [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/05.-Phaedra-Loquet_gene-therapy-patients-perspectives-and-case-study.pdf Phaedra Loquet_gene therapy patients’ perspectives and case study]

The session forms part of CHANGER’s ongoing efforts to strengthen ethics review capacity and support research ethics committees in addressing emerging ethical issues arising from scientific and technological innovation.

For more information about CHANGER training activities, follow the project on social media and subscribe to our newsletter!
|Important For=Research Ethics Committee Member; Research Ethics Expert; Researcher; Researcher, Research Ethics Committee Member
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://changer-project.eu/material-available-changer-training-on-gene-editing-in-research-explores-emerging-ethical-challenges-in-gene-therapy/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:1109c5ac-043c-44da-9f65-daaea5fa3eda

0009-0000-3200-3626 — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:17:30 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Education |Title=CHANGER Trainings: Electronic Informed Consent in Research |Is About=The first online training session of the CHANGER Project, title..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Education
|Title=CHANGER Trainings: Electronic Informed Consent in Research
|Is About=The first online training session of the CHANGER Project, titled ''[https://changer-project.eu/changer-project-trainings-1-electronic-informed-consent-in-research/ Electronic Informed Consent in Research]'', was successfully held on 4 May 2026, bringing together experts and members of Research Ethics Committees from across Europe.

The training addressed key ethical, legal, and practical challenges related to the use of electronic informed consent (eConsent) in contemporary research environments. Participants explored how digital tools and emerging technologies are transforming informed consent procedures, while also raising important questions regarding autonomy, accessibility, data protection, transparency, and participant understanding.

The session formed part of CHANGER’s broader effort to strengthen ethics review practices and support ethics-by-design approaches in research and innovation. The training also contributed to the project’s objective of equipping ethics review experts with practical knowledge and tools to address challenges arising from evolving research practices and new technologies.

The event featured expert presentations, interactive discussions, and case-based reflections on the implementation and evaluation of eConsent processes in research settings. Participants exchanged experiences and perspectives on ensuring meaningful informed consent in increasingly digital and data-driven research environments.

The recording of the training session is now available online, together with the presentations delivered by the speakers:

* Watch the training video: https://youtu.be/FeGu_lCeXC4
* Download the presentations: [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/01.-Alice-intro-info-consent.pdf Definition and main requirements of informed consent], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Janos-Meszaros-eIC-legal.pdf Legal landscape: EU regulations], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/02.-Borry-informed-consent-ethical-landscape.pdf Ethical landscape: challenges and solutions], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/03.-Kaat-case-study.pdf Case presentation]

The CHANGER Team would like to warmly thank all speakers and participants for their valuable contributions and active engagement.

The project will continue its training activities with the upcoming online training ''“[https://changer-project.eu/changer-trainings-gene-editing-in-research/ Gene Editing in Research]”'', taking place on 8 June 2026. The training will explore ethical, legal, and societal challenges associated with gene editing technologies and their application in research contexts. More information and registration details are available [https://changer-project.eu/changer-trainings-gene-editing-in-research/ here].

For more information about CHANGER training activities, follow the project on social media and subscribe to our newsletter!<div><div></div></div><div></div><div></div>
|Important For=Early Career Researcher; Ethics reviewers; Research Ethics Committee Member; Research Ethics Expert; Research Manager / Administrator; Researcher
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://changer-project.eu/material-available-changer-trainings-electronic-informed-consent-in-research/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Resource:1529bbbb-7cf2-4a3e-aa89-84c843dd6472

0009-0000-3200-3626 — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:17:05 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Education |Title=CHANGER Trainings: Electronic Informed Consent in Research |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:Df0d11b5-2efa-4b58-b94f-6845c6e83b11 |..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Education
|Title=CHANGER Trainings: Electronic Informed Consent in Research
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:Df0d11b5-2efa-4b58-b94f-6845c6e83b11
|Is About=The first online training session of the CHANGER Project, titled ''[https://changer-project.eu/changer-project-trainings-1-electronic-informed-consent-in-research/ Electronic Informed Consent in Research]'', was successfully held on 4 May 2026, bringing together experts and members of Research Ethics Committees from across Europe.

The training addressed key ethical, legal, and practical challenges related to the use of electronic informed consent (eConsent) in contemporary research environments. Participants explored how digital tools and emerging technologies are transforming informed consent procedures, while also raising important questions regarding autonomy, accessibility, data protection, transparency, and participant understanding.

The session formed part of CHANGER’s broader effort to strengthen ethics review practices and support ethics-by-design approaches in research and innovation. The training also contributed to the project’s objective of equipping ethics review experts with practical knowledge and tools to address challenges arising from evolving research practices and new technologies.

The event featured expert presentations, interactive discussions, and case-based reflections on the implementation and evaluation of eConsent processes in research settings. Participants exchanged experiences and perspectives on ensuring meaningful informed consent in increasingly digital and data-driven research environments.

The recording of the training session is now available online, together with the presentations delivered by the speakers:

* Watch the training video: https://youtu.be/FeGu_lCeXC4
* Download the presentations: [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/01.-Alice-intro-info-consent.pdf Definition and main requirements of informed consent], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Janos-Meszaros-eIC-legal.pdf Legal landscape: EU regulations], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/02.-Borry-informed-consent-ethical-landscape.pdf Ethical landscape: challenges and solutions], [https://changer-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/03.-Kaat-case-study.pdf Case presentation]

The CHANGER Team would like to warmly thank all speakers and participants for their valuable contributions and active engagement.

The project will continue its training activities with the upcoming online training ''“[https://changer-project.eu/changer-trainings-gene-editing-in-research/ Gene Editing in Research]”'', taking place on 8 June 2026. The training will explore ethical, legal, and societal challenges associated with gene editing technologies and their application in research contexts. More information and registration details are available [https://changer-project.eu/changer-trainings-gene-editing-in-research/ here].

For more information about CHANGER training activities, follow the project on social media and subscribe to our newsletter!<div><div></div></div><div></div><div></div>
|Important For=Early Career Researcher; Ethics reviewers; Research Ethics Committee Member; Research Ethics Expert; Research Manager / Administrator; Researcher
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://changer-project.eu/material-available-changer-trainings-electronic-informed-consent-in-research/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}

Guide:5bdcecd5-4da9-4a6c-9c63-ea9f90b4112a

0009-0000-3200-3626 — Thu, 09 Jul 2026 13:07:46 GMT

Created page with "{{Guide |Title=Research Ethics – A guide to ethical review in innovative fields - CHANGER MOOCs |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:Df0d11b5-2efa-4b58-b94f-6845c6e83b11 |Guid..."

New page

{{Guide
|Title=Research Ethics – A guide to ethical review in innovative fields - CHANGER MOOCs
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:Df0d11b5-2efa-4b58-b94f-6845c6e83b11
|Guide Goal=The CHANGER Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are now officially available, marking another important milestone in the CHANGER project.

Designed for researchers, Research Ethics Committee (REC) members, research managers, innovation professionals, students, and anyone interested in responsible research and innovation, the CHANGER MOOCs provide practical guidance on addressing ethical challenges in emerging and innovative research fields.

The online courses offer free of charge, flexible, self-paced learning and equip participants with the knowledge and tools needed to navigate ethical review processes, strengthen ethical decision-making, and promote responsible research practices.<div>The CHANGER MOOC, “Research Ethics – A Guide to Ethical Review in Innovative Fields,” is now available on the edX learning platform. Participants can enrol at any time, complete the course at their own pace, and receive a certificate of completion upon successfully finishing the training. The MOOCs cover the thematic areas of AI research, gene editing, organoids and electronic informed consent.
Whether you are looking to deepen your understanding of research ethics, enhance your professional skills, or support ethical research practices within your organisation, the CHANGER MOOCs provide an accessible and high-quality learning opportunity.

Enrol here: https://www.edx.org/learn/ethics/ku-leuven-research-ethics-a-guide-to-ethical-review-in-innovative-fields

Learn more about CHANGER: https://changer-project.eu/
</div>
|Important For=Research Ethics Committee Member; Research Ethics Expert; Research Integrity Officer / Committee Member; Ethics reviewers; Early Career Researcher; Researcher; Researcher, Research Ethics Committee Member; Senior Researcher
|Sign Up=https://changer-project.eu/changer-moocs-are-now-live-enrol-today/
}}
{{Custom TabContent Trainee Open}}
{{Guide List Wrapper Trainee Open}}
{{Guide List Wrapper Trainee Close}}
{{Custom TabContent Close Trainee}}
{{Custom TabContent Trainer Open}}
{{Guide List Wrapper Trainer Open}}
{{Guide List Wrapper Trainer Close}}
{{Custom TabContent Close Trainer}}

Resource:A944aee9-f461-4296-a2c0-fa77d9a90f75

0000-0003-4416-1351 — Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:55:38 GMT

Resource:3bc368c1-c90d-4912-90a7-85cc31a0503c

0000-0003-4416-1351 — Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:54:00 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=Policy brief “AI Ethics from Principles to Practice” |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:F4d945c9-461b-44f7-91ba-db70ca6332a1 |I..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=Policy brief “AI Ethics from Principles to Practice”
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:F4d945c9-461b-44f7-91ba-db70ca6332a1
|Is About=The AIOLIA policy brief “AI Ethics: From Principles to Practice” focuses on bridging the gap between ethical AI principles and their practical implementation in organizations. While frameworks such as the EU AI Act and the Assessment List for Trustworthy AI (ALTAI) define ethical requirements, many organizations struggle to apply these principles consistently during the development and deployment of AI systems. The policy brief argues that ethical AI requires more than compliance with regulations; it must become part of an organization's governance, culture, and decision-making processes.

Based on experiences from ten AI use cases across sectors including healthcare, human resources, security, automotive engineering, elderly care, and AI companions, the AIOLIA project developed practical methods to support responsible AI. These include 175 organizational and technical measures, 12 contextualized ethics principles, and six policy recommendations that help translate abstract ethical concepts into actionable practices. The brief also recommends improving implementation guidance, updating existing assessment tools, expanding regulatory sandboxes for innovation, encouraging collaboration between academia and industry, and investing in research on AI's long-term societal impacts. Overall, it promotes a practical, continuous approach to developing trustworthy and human-centered AI.
|Important Because=This policy brief is important because many organizations struggle to convert ethical AI principles into everyday practice. Regulations such as the EU AI Act specify legal obligations but often lack practical implementation guidance, particularly for smaller organizations with limited resources. AIOLIA provides tested methods, governance processes, and practical measures that help organizations develop trustworthy AI while reducing legal, reputational, and operational risks. The recommendations also encourage collaboration between policymakers, researchers, and industry to create consistent standards and evidence-based governance. This supports responsible AI innovation while protecting human rights, transparency, accountability, and public trust in AI systems.
|Important For=IT / Technical Professional; Policy Maker / Regulator; Researchers, Research Ethics Committee Member
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://aiolia.eu/index.php/policy-brief-ai-ethics-from-principles-to-practice/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags
|Has Virtue And Value=Transparency; Responsibility; Accountability; Fairness; Trustworthiness
}}

Resource:A944aee9-f461-4296-a2c0-fa77d9a90f75

0000-0003-4416-1351 — Mon, 06 Jul 2026 09:43:18 GMT

Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Guidelines |Title=Policy brief “Ethical challenges of AI companions” |Has Related Initiative=Initiative:F4d945c9-461b-44f7-91ba-db70ca6332a1 |Is..."

New page

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=Policy brief “Ethical challenges of AI companions”
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:F4d945c9-461b-44f7-91ba-db70ca6332a1
|Is About=The AIOLIA policy brief “Ethical Challenges of AI Companions” examines the ethical and regulatory issues arising from AI systems that build ongoing, emotionally engaging relationships with users. These AI companions include dedicated chatbot applications and general-purpose AI models that provide emotional support, personal coaching, entertainment, or advice through repeated interactions. Unlike traditional AI tools, AI companions can influence users' emotions, decisions, and behaviors over time, creating risks such as emotional dependency, manipulation, privacy loss, and reduced human autonomy.

The brief argues that current European regulations, particularly the AI Act, focus mainly on transparency by requiring users to be informed that they are interacting with AI. However, this alone is insufficient because users may knowingly interact with AI while still becoming emotionally attached or behaviorally influenced over time. To address these emerging risks, the policy brief recommends four governance measures:

(1) identifying and protecting users whose vulnerability develops during long-term interactions,

(2) implementing longitudinal oversight that monitors patterns across repeated conversations rather than isolated exchanges,

(3) designing AI systems with intentional "friction," such as reflective prompts and breaks to reduce over-engagement, and

(4) moving beyond simple disclosure by providing contextual transparency that helps users understand how AI shapes their interactions and behaviors. These recommendations aim to ensure that AI companions remain beneficial while protecting users' well-being and fundamental rights.
|Important Because=This policy brief is important because AI companions are becoming increasingly integrated into people's daily lives, offering emotional support, advice, and companionship. While these technologies provide significant benefits, they also introduce new ethical challenges that existing regulations do not adequately address. Long-term interactions can lead to emotional dependence, privacy risks, manipulation, and changes in user behavior that develop gradually rather than through isolated incidents. The brief provides practical recommendations for policymakers and AI developers to create safeguards that balance innovation with user protection. Its proposals help ensure that AI companions promote human well-being, preserve autonomy, and maintain trust in AI technologies as their use continues to expand.
|Important For=IT / Technical Professional; Researchers; Policy Maker / Regulator; Civil Society / NGO Representative
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://aiolia.eu/index.php/policy-brief-ethical-challenges-of-ai-companions/
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags
|Has Virtue And Value=Responsibility; Honesty; Integrity
}}

User:0000-0002-1346-9145

0000-0002-1346-9145 — Sun, 05 Jul 2026 15:40:35 GMT

create user page

New page

Instruction:730cb733-bc5a-4f97-b235-1a00a30c8815

0000-0003-4786-4044 — Wed, 01 Jul 2026 16:52:22 GMT

User:0000-0002-0743-515X

0000-0002-0743-515X — Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:12:59 GMT

create user page

New page

Instruction:B8be5b25-e909-4410-954c-4bb0c6c17586

0000-0003-4416-1351 — Mon, 29 Jun 2026 07:33:04 GMT

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Title=Mantra (research data management training)
 |Is About=This online training is intended for researchers who handle digital data as part of their research. It consists of several learning units on data management such as protecting sensitive data, organizing data and data management planning, among others.
-|Important For=Early Career Researcher;Doctoral Student;Senior Researcher;Senior Researcher
+|Important For=Doctoral Student; Early Career Researcher; Senior Researcher
 }}
 {{Link
-|Has Link=https://mantra.edina.ac.uk/
+|Has Link=https://mantra.ed.ac.uk/
 }}
 {{Tags
 |Involves=University of Edinburgh

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * '''Apply''' responsible research methods in citizen science or community engagement in climate-affected contexts.
 |Has Duration=0.8
-|Important For=Students; Ethics reviewers
+|Important For=Ethics reviewers; Students; Citizen Scientists
 }}
 {{Custom TabContent Trainee Open}}

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 . Apply systems thinking in an ethically informed way to identify context-sensitive and just interventions.
 |Has Duration=1.5
-|Important For=Students; Researchers
+|Important For=Researchers; Students
 }}
 {{Custom TabContent Trainee Open}}
@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 {{Instruction Step Trainee
 |Instruction Step Title=Extra resources
-|Instruction Step Text=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations – Food Systems
+|Instruction Step Text=Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), n.d. ''Agrifood systems''. Available at: [https://www.fao.org/food-systems/en//?utm_source=chatgpt.com FAO Agrifood Systems] [Accessed 29 June 2026].
-European Commission – Bioeconomy Strategy
+European Commission, 2025. ''Bioeconomy Strategy: A strategy for a competitive and sustainable EU bioeconomy''. Available at: [https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/bioeconomy-strategy_en?utm_source=chatgpt.com European Commission Bioeconomy Strategy] [Accessed 29 June 2026].
-UNESCO – Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS)
+United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), n.d. ''Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS)''. Available at: [https://www.unesco.org/en/links?utm_source=chatgpt.com UNESCO Local and Indigenous Knowledge Systems (LINKS)] [Accessed 29 June 2026].
 }}
 {{Instruction Remarks Trainee}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 11 July 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 11 July 2026
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 (3) designing AI systems with intentional "friction," such as reflective prompts and breaks to reduce over-engagement, and
-(4) moving beyond simple disclosure by providing contextual transparency that helps users understand how AI shapes their interactions and behaviors. These recommendations aim to ensure that AI companions remain beneficial while protecting users' well-being and fundamental rights.
+(4) moving beyond simple disclosure by providing contextual transparency
 |Important Because=This policy brief is important because AI companions are becoming increasingly integrated into people's daily lives, offering emotional support, advice, and companionship. While these technologies provide significant benefits, they also introduce new ethical challenges that existing regulations do not adequately address. Long-term interactions can lead to emotional dependence, privacy risks, manipulation, and changes in user behavior that develop gradually rather than through isolated incidents. The brief provides practical recommendations for policymakers and AI developers to create safeguards that balance innovation with user protection. Its proposals help ensure that AI companions promote human well-being, preserve autonomy, and maintain trust in AI technologies as their use continues to expand.
-|Important For=IT / Technical Professional; Researchers; Policy Maker / Regulator; Civil Society / NGO Representative
+|Important For=Civil Society / NGO Representative; IT / Technical Professional; Policy Maker / Regulator; Researchers
 }}
 {{Link
@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 {{Related To}}
 {{Tags
-|Has Virtue And Value=Responsibility; Honesty; Integrity
+|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Integrity; Responsibility
 }}