Resource
From The Embassy of Good Science
- Choose a category:
- Guide (16)
- Initiative (58)
- Instruction (170)
- Interactive Content (5)
- Report (16)
- Resource (1936)
- Theme (216)
Back
Resources
Materials that help you in your every-day research practice to do Good Science.
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
For whom is this important?
Research Area
Who
When
Where
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Type
Cases
Kakoli Majumder(17-11-2015)
Guidelines
National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (NESH)(2018)
Education
United States Office of Research Integrity(2004)
Education
Lamas, Salinas, Vuillaume(2016)
Education
McEuen, Todd-Mancillas, et al.(1990)
Education
Fix, Odell, Sina, Meslin, Goodman, Upshur(2013)
Education
Aggarval, Gupte, Kass, Taylor, Ali, Bhan(2011)
Education
De Vries, Stanczyk, Ryan, Kim(2011)
Education
Madeline Alexander, Wendy Reed Williams
Education
Porteri, Borry(2008)
Education
Kligyte, Marcy, Sevier, Godfrey, Mumford(2008)
Education
Galipeau, Barbour, Baskin, Bell-Syer, Cobey, Cumpston, et al.(2016)
Education
Schaffer(2009)
Education
The Alan Turing Institute(2023)
Cases
VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands Board on Research Integrity, LOWI(2018)
Education
Schreier, Wilson, Resnik(2006)
Cases
American Sociological Association
Education
BEYOND, Rodrigues, R., & Pizzolato, D.
Guidelines
Exploration Committee Revision Code of Conduct for Academic Practice(2016)
Guidelines
Alliance of German Science Organisations(2010)
Education
Hill, Page(2009)
Education
Thompson, Fisher-Thompson(2013)
Education
United States Office of Research Integrity(2008)
Education
Kligyte, Marcy, Waples, Sevier, Godfrey, Mumford(2008)
Cases
Royal Swedisch Academy of Sciences, Karolinska Institute(2010-2017)
Education
Elizabeth Heitman, Ruth Ellen Bulger(2005)
Education
Whellan, Kraus, Kitzman, Rooney, Keteyian, Piña, et al.(2015)
Education
Tsao, Roberts(2009)
Education
United States Office of Research Integrity(2015)
Guidelines
Austrian Higher Education Conference, OEAWI
Education
Smith, Master(2017)
Education
Geller, Boyce, Ford, Sugarman(2010)
Guidelines
Biomedical Alliance in Europe (Biomed Alliance)(2020)
Scenarios
EnTIRE, Student, Ružica Bočina(26/10/2021)
Guidelines
Brazilian Academy of Sciences(2013)
Pages in category "Resource"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of 1,937 total.
(previous page) (next page)2
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct
- Infographics on research integrity
- The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics
- A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
- EQIPD E-learning: The principles of rigour and robustness in animal experiments
- Spanish National Statement on Scientific Integrity (2015)
- Materials scientist up to nine retractions
- MRC Centre for Research Policy Learning Management System
- Ethical issues in research and publication
- UKRIO Code of Practice for Research: Promoting good practice and preventing misconduct (2023)
- Case report: incidental finding of a giant cardiac mass
- Local resources on improving science: basic study
- Science and Surveillance: Western Institutions Consider Role in China’s Uighur Crackdown
- Everything We Know About Facebook's Secret Mood Manipulation Experiment. It was probably legal. But was it ethical?
- The Cape Town Statement on Fostering Research Integrity through Fairness and Equity, 2022
- Ensuring Long Term Functioning of Citizen Observatories (policy brief)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports
- UKRIO's Procedure for the investigation of misconduct in research
- VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation
- Guidance for Fair and Fast Desk Assessment of Submitted Manuscripts During Times of Crisis
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects
3
- A case study on safety engineers using AI tools to speed up software release approvals
- Who will mentor the mentors?
- Data Sharing, Informed Consent and Confidentiality
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
- The Rotterdam Dilemma Game
- Human Research Violations By Eye Doctor Showcase A National Problem
- ENERI Decision Tree
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
- Communication role on perception and beliefs of EU citizens about science - policy brief
- Reporting Findings in a Timely Manner
- Good Research Practice (Swedish Research Council)
- "A Little Thing Like Plagiarism"
- Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief)
- Introduction to Research Integrity and Good Scientific Practices
- Disclosing Research Findings
- Manchester University's Code of Good Research Conduct
- Ethical code of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (2023), Slovak Academy of Sciences
- Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
- Data Privacy & Security Global Coronavirus Toolkit
- Doing Global science
- Australian Research Council Research Integrity Policy
- Procrastinating Reviewer
- Responsible authorship quick guide
- The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences
- What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
- European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
- Use Historical Empathy to Help Students Process the World Today
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes
- Reproducibility of methodology
- Blinded by Private Conflict – Choosing Ego Over Professionalism
- A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
- Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: a preliminary study
- Addressing the socio-economic consequences of research misconduct
- COPE core practices
- Pressure to disclose confidential research findings
- Guide to Recommendations for Responsible Practices -2013 (2013), Brazilian Academy of Sciences
- Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
- Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2023 Edition (ALLEA Code)
- 国家自然科学基金委员会 基础研究知识库开放获取政策实施细则 (2014), National Natural Science Foundation Committee (NSFC)
- Integrating a peer-taught module on practical research ethics into the graduate student orientation curriculum
- Multiple submission
- The Replication Crisis in Psychology
- A Survey of Doctoral Education in Communication Research Ethics
- Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial
- The ANR's open science policy (2023), Agence Natinale de la Recherche
- ROSIE General Guidelines on Responsible Open Science (2023), Responsible Open Science in Europe (ROSiE)
- An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.
- Research by Students
- UK Research Integrity Office's Case Study Collection
- Policy brief “AI Ethics from Principles to Practice”
- List of online available training options for members of research ethics committees (RECs)
- Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors
- Federation of European Toxicologists and European Societies of Toxicology (Eurotox) Code of Ethics
- Open Science Manifesto (2019), OSCDnet
- Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News
- The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
- PRINTEGER
- Misconduct: the stars who fell to earth
- European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2023) , ALLEA (European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities)
- The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
- Swedish Research Council's Conflict of Interest Policy
- Research Ethics: a guide for responsible research with human subjects
- Peer review card exchange game
- Vulnerable Populations
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research institutions on continuous research integrity education
- The Case of Falsified Data
- Research published by Hans Eysenck is unsafe
- The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
- The EQUATOR Network: Reporting guidelines
- Trust in science , the perspective of European policy makers- Policy Brief
- Failed Patenting Negotiations in Collaborative Research
- Power to the People
- Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes
- Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
- THE SAN CODE OF RESEARCH ETHICS (2017)
- A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article
- Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing
4
- Enhancing Understanding of Science Through Science Clubs (policy brief)
- In the matter of J Hendrik Schön
- Banked Samples and HD Testing
- European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH)
- FOSTER project workshop
- CHANGER training on Gene Editing in Research explores emerging ethical challenges in Gene Therapy
- Path2Integrity Learning Card S0: Good research is based on honesty
- Research Integrity & Research Ethics: Guidelines of the Austrian Science Funds
- What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing?
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research
- A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies
- Research Integrity: the Experience of a Doubting Thomas
- Disclosure of Sources of Grant Funds
- International Code of Ethics Young Scientists
- Casuistry – is this RM, QRP or RCR? Three cases with dilemmas
- The Three Rs of Animal Research
- RCR online course: build an online course to augment RCR training using evidenced-based learning theory
- Scientists in Chile Protest Mummy Study
- What to communicate in retraction notices?
- European Astronomical Society (EAS) Ethics Statement and Guidelines for Good Practice
- Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members
- Anonymity Revisited
- Duplicate publication uprooted from plant journal
- Independent Research Fund Denmark – Open Access Policy and Dissemination Guidelines
- Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors
- Harms and benefits - International research ethics and cultural values
- Code of Ethics Young Scientists (2018)
- Platforma za otvorenu nauku (2018), Ministry of Education Science and Technological Development (MESTD)
- Community's of Practice Datamanagement & Privacy
- Instilling scholarly integrity
- It’s Still Plagiarism
- ECS Academy platform by CitizenScience.eu
- Achieving Equitable Research Partnerships by Facilitating Visas for short-term Researcher Mobility
- Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
- Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science
- Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
- FRQ Open Access Dissemination Policy (2022), Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ)
- Slow Code
- Taiwan Junior Code of Conduct for Research Integrity 2023
- Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet
- Enhancing EU law on climate engineering, neurotechnologies, and digital extended reality (policy brief)
- Responsible science: vol. 2
- Community consultation and public disclosure: preliminary results from a new model
- Code of Ethics of the Croatian Science Foundation (April 2018)
- Credit for work
- Code of Good Scientific Practices of the Spanish National Research Council (CSIS)
- Reproducibility training
- OeAWI Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice (2018)
- Protecting Research Subjects
- The PREPARED Code: Global Code of Conduct for Research during Pandemics
- Integrating Ethics Into a Research Experience for Undergraduates
- Open science outlook 1: status and trends around the world
- Open Access Policy at Czech Academy of Sciences
- National Principles for Open Access Policy Statement (2013), National Steering Committee on Open Access Policy
- UKRIO's Guidance for researchers on retractions in academic journals
- Path2Integrity Online Learning Environment
- National Policy on Academic Ethics (2019), Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India
- SOPs4RI Guidelines for research funders on the selection and evaluation of proposals
- Studying colonial artefacts with integrity
- An issue with insufficient data in the survey-resulting in a non-representative sample
- Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage
- Fraud in Fluid Resuscitation Research
- The Dutch anthropologist making up data and papers
- Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
- Open Access - information for researchers (2024) — Swiss National Science Foundation
- Eigenfactorizer
- Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People
- Conflicts with Community Leaders
- Ousted: Rule-Breaking Lundbeck CEO and Novartis Scientist Get the Boot
- Declaration of Geneva
- Irish Council for Bioethics' Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity
- UNESCO Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers 2018
- PhD and Supervisor charter (KU Leuven)
- Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
- Designing Online Resources in Preparation for Authentic Laboratory Experiences
- A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials
- Research ethics committee conditions: Ethical challenges of researching with poor communities in Malawi
- A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
- Bias in hiring
- New Zealand Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities (2019)
- SOPs4RI - Guidelines for research institutions on community building for a positive research culture
- Code of Ethics for Scientific Research in Belgium (Belgium, 2009)
- Responsible conduct in research
- Data Handling and Record Keeping
- Mobile Application
- The Paroxetine 352 Bipolar Trial: A Study in Medical Ghostwriting
- European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training
- The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide
- Collaboration dispute
- Irish Universities Quality Board's Good Practice for Institutional Research in Irish Higher Education
- Training overview
- THE MALAYSIAN CODE OF RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN RESEARCH 2020
- CROATIAN OPEN ACCESS DECLARATION (2012), Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts
- PRBB Code of Good Scientific Practice
- Hidden for a century, 'fake' is actually a Van Gogh
- Writing usable qualitative health research findings
- Paxil Study Under Fire
- Psychologist made up sex bias results
- Overview: underserved areas of education in the responsible conduct of research: authorship
- Brussels Declaration on Open Access (2012), Federal Science Policy, Wallonia-Brussels Federation, and Flemish Ministry for Economy, Science, and Innovation
