View source for Resource:3758c3d9-cde3-4011-af46-4ebe9ac04d99

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Reproducibility of methodology
|Is About=The case focuses on editorial decision-making regarding controversial methodology and post-publication peer review. Two published articles focused on the effect of energy healing on an in-vitro model of disease. Whistleblower concerns were raised about the appropriateness and reproducibility of the energy healing methodology used.
|Important For=Editors; Peer reviewers; Researchers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://publicationethics.org/case/reproducibility-methodology
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:47bfd883-c518-4a97-98fb-86b5cf442d3e
|Related To Theme=Theme:9025f215-cc6a-4b00-894b-68b9a089f173;Theme:7e07b7fa-793a-4282-a036-6fefe8480b3a
}}
{{Tags
|Involves=COPE
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Reproducability
}}