Revision as of 15:52, 26 October 2020

Resources

Cases

Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent

This is a factual case.

The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |Resource Type=Cases
 |Title=Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent
-|Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct<ref>Reich, Eugenie Samuel. "Misconduct ruling is silent on intent." ''Nature'' 489.7415 (2012): 189.</ref>. This is a factual case.
+|Is About=This is a factual case.
 <references />
 |Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.