Difference between revisions of "Resource:E11c2017-febf-4986-a02a-4d6d9599d21a"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title=Author | + | |Title=Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility |
| − | |Is About=Researchers everywhere are under increasing pressure to publish in high quality journals. The amount of space available in a journal such as ''Medical Education'' has not kept pace with the rise in submissions. Against a background of fierce competition, authors sometimes cut corners. This may lead to misconduct<ref> | + | |Is About=Researchers everywhere are under increasing pressure to publish in high quality journals. The amount of space available in a journal such as ''Medical Education'' has not kept pace with the rise in submissions. Against a background of fierce competition, authors sometimes cut corners. This may lead to misconduct<ref>Brice, Julie, and John Bligh. "Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility." ''Medical education'' 39.1 (2005): 83-89.</ref>. This is a factual case. |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because=This paper aims to explore the most common types of publication misconduct seen in the ''Medical Education'' editorial office, and to consider the reasons for this and the implications for researchers in the field<ref> | + | |Important Because=This paper aims to explore the most common types of publication misconduct seen in the ''Medical Education'' editorial office, and to consider the reasons for this and the implications for researchers in the field<ref>Brice, Julie, and John Bligh. "Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility." ''Medical education'' 39.1 (2005): 83-89.</ref> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
|Important For=Researchers; phd students | |Important For=Researchers; phd students | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
|Has Link=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02027.x | |Has Link=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02027.x | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:A1a1b736-7002-405c-8375-711a11f20e04;Theme:Ab4200ca-c14d-413d-a9f6-aa5a93e1800e | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
|Has Timepoint=2003-2004 | |Has Timepoint=2003-2004 | ||
Revision as of 10:05, 26 May 2020
ResourcesCases
Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility
What is this about?
Researchers everywhere are under increasing pressure to publish in high quality journals. The amount of space available in a journal such as Medical Education has not kept pace with the rise in submissions. Against a background of fierce competition, authors sometimes cut corners. This may lead to misconduct[1]. This is a factual case.
- ↑ Brice, Julie, and John Bligh. "Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility." Medical education 39.1 (2005): 83-89.
Why is this important?
This paper aims to explore the most common types of publication misconduct seen in the Medical Education editorial office, and to consider the reasons for this and the implications for researchers in the field[1]
- ↑ Brice, Julie, and John Bligh. "Author misconduct: not just the editors' responsibility." Medical education 39.1 (2005): 83-89.
