What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
Whether it is purposeful attempt to deceit and knowingly one manipulates data, images, results, or, corrections in publications are the outcome of honest mistakes, this blog raises the editors' dilemma in accepting new submission by these authors. An interesting example for discussion mainly for those involved in publishing.
Linked to the case of Olivier Voinnet, the blog presents an example of publishers' response to authors whose past papers have been retracted or have had corrections issued on them.
What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?# QUERYb91c1d7fb9104f68c9101bc7db7bfd06
What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?# QUERY0db60acd934f78471cac5070bfaa306d
Investigation ends in 6th retraction for Voinnet