'''Detection''' Educators are increasingly checking student essays and theses using plagiarism check software. Publishers can also use similar software to undertake similarity checks on submitted manuscripts against published work and archived submissions. Springer has dedicated a [https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/editors/plagiarism-prevention-with-crosscheck/4238 page] on the prevention of plagiarism. There are, however, currently no known initiatives for funders to check plagiarism in funding applications.
Plagiarism denies authors the credit for their work, but it also gives the perpetrator unfair advantage over peers in terms of publications, researcher evaluations and career progression. It particularly violates the principle of honesty which is integral to research integrity.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000009-QINU`"' Plagiarism is often described as a type of research misconduct which should be prevented and sanctioned in research integrity codes of conduct, statements and declarations. The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity states that “Researchers should report to the appropriate authorities any suspected research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification or plagiarism, and other irresponsible research practices that undermine the trustworthiness of research”. '"`UNIQ--ref-0000000A-QINU`"' Clearly, plagiarism involves deception. However, some have argued, in terms of ‘scientific integrity’, it might be less serious than fabrication and falsification and even some of the less frequently sanctioned ‘questionable research practices’. '"`UNIQ--ref-0000000B-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--ref-0000000C-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-0000000D-QINU`"'
Plagiarism is a form of research misconduct. It is defined, by the European Code of Conduct, as “using other people’s work and ideas without giving proper credit to the original source, thus violating the rights of the original author(s) to their intellectual outputs.”. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000007-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000008-QINU`"'
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERYcc9ee7dd483efb32d1be78cd96693136
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERY3e9ddaa9f6dafd7ccf1a3176c46b8823
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERY2a7aaee314fbd6f902628a418b81e805
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERYec3d76930f5ebf0dbca0bd62f12974d4
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERY4ed55e4abd155e2a4e733a97aa64b0b9
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERYea8bf1c9e5072cf38a90b8b1337d9b8c
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism# QUERY1f72a81f82bfd84c40d0c6868b66888d
Display Title: PlagiarismAI Generated Content
Display Title: PlagiarismAI use in scientific writing
'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper
A 24-year-old sociology paper found to have plagiarised a 1975 article
Academic integrity at MIT, a handbook for students
An author realized a paper had plagiarized his thesis. It took the journal four years to retract it.
Copy and paste: A slow university investigation into serious accusations of misconduct benefits no one
Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud
Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations
Plagiarism charge for Romanian minister - Scandal adds to fears that country’s research reform is in peril
Reviewer’s Déjà Vu, French Science Sleuthing Uncover Plagiarized Papers
Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Background Section
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Duplicate Publication
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise
Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Unauthorised Translation
What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds
Display Title: PublicationAuthorship criteria
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
Display Title: PublicationRetractions: correcting the scientific literature
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingSalami publication
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationSelf-plagiarism
Display Title: Research misconductFabrication
Display Title: Research misconductFalsification
Is there an overall theme which already addresses some relevant points?