The European Code of Conduct'"`UNIQ--ref-00000005-QINU`"' states that good research practice with regard to collaborations are based on the following principles: *"All partners in research collaborations take responsibility for the integrity of the research. *All partners in research collaborations agree at the outset on the goals of the research and on the process for communicating their research as transparently and openly as possible. * All partners formally agree at the start of their collaboration on expectations and standards concerning research integrity, on the laws and regulations that will apply, on protection of the intellectual property of collaborators, and on procedures for handling conflicts and possible cases of misconduct. *All partners in research collaborations are properly informed and consulted about submissions for publication of the research results. "(ECC 2017, section 2.6) Vicens and Bourne (2007) suggest the following rules'"`UNIQ--ref-00000006-QINU`"': #Do Not Be Lured into Just Any Collaboration #Decide at the Beginning Who Will Work on What Tasks #Stick to Your Tasks #Be Open and Honest #Feel Respect, Get Respect #Communicate, Communicate, and Communicate #Protect Yourself from a Collaboration That Turns Sour #Always Acknowledge and Cite Your Collaborators #Seek Advice from Experienced Scientists #If Your Collaboration Satisfies You, Keep It Going '"`UNIQ--references-00000007-QINU`"'
A lot of scientific work happens through collaboration. Yet, collaborations can also lead to conflict when there is lack of clarity about the roles of different collaborators, or when expectations are not met. Collaborative work has become more important over the past few decades, partially due to the rise of interdisciplinary research. The number of co-authors on a paper is a potential indifcatar for the rise of collaborations, with the average number of co-authors on research papers for the PNAS rose from 3.9 in 1981 to 8.4 in 2001. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000003-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000004-QINU`"'
Collaborative working is "the act of two or more people or organizations working together for a particular purpose". '"`UNIQ--ref-00000000-QINU`"' Collaborative working can cover formal or informal ways to work together. Formal collaborations include research projects under specified research grants, informal collaborations include, for example, networks or alliances.'"`UNIQ--ref-00000001-QINU`"' Collaborations can be permanent or last for a certain time period. Important for succesfull research collaborations is having good underlying principles providing the basis for agreements of collaborations. '"`UNIQ--references-00000002-QINU`"'
Collaborative working# QUERYa8a5b9c12616e9486a8d3cc8073a303c
Collaborative working# QUERYbba099e287653b784a1556ae2bccaff0
Collaborative working# QUERY9853f117b32e5cd34c4d14fca6706def
Collaborative working# QUERY2b28faa97cb6a86372e151b398057d4d
Collaborative working# QUERYee7c6d02f058beb79e1f3a8e22d9a141
Collaborative working# QUERYca9a514a3ff272613a144a85a7cdea59
Collaborative working# QUERYacf1d71a7c69c8aa671ee5a50395835a
Display Title: Collaborative workingCollaboration In Research
Display Title: Collaborative workingCross-boundary collaborations
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
Display Title: Collaborative workingHigh income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
COPE seminar, webinar and ppt presentation
Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
Framework to Enhance Research Integrity in Research Collaborations
Intellectual Rights Involving Multiple Institutions
Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science
Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations
Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration
Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research
Scientific Research: Dilemmas and Temptations (booklet of cases)
Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity r
The TRUST Code - a Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships
Being grossly unfair to your collaborators
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationBeing grossly unfair to your collaborators
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationGender bias
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationResearch collaboration
Take no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationTake no full responsibility for the integrity of the research project and its reports
Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationTurning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
Is there an overall theme which already addresses some relevant points?