Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors
==QRPs== According to research integrity experts who participated in a survey, '"`UNIQ--ref-0000001C-QINU`"' there are a number of QRPs that occur frequently and have a high impact on science. In relation to study design, for instance, QRPs include presenting misleading information in a grant application or ignoring risks of unexpected findings or safety risks to study participants, workers or environment. Under data collection falls behaviour such as collecting more data when noticing that statistical significance is almost reached or keeping inadequate notes of the research process. in relation to reporting, examples of QRPs are hypothesizing after the results are known (HARKing), concealing results that contradict earlier findings, or not publishing a study with negative results. Moreover, selective citing to enhance your own findings or pleasing editors and colleagues is reported to often occur. QRPs that fall under collaboration are demanding or accepting authorship for which you do not qualify and reviewing your own papers. In addition, the misbehaviour that is estimated to occur the most and have a high impact on truth is insufficiently supervising junior coworkers. The misbehaviour that occurs the most and has the highest impact on trust is using published ideas of others without referencing. =='''Prevention'''== A way to counter QRPs could be to create awareness about research integrity issues and alter the current reward system. Instead of rewarding the number of publications, alternative aspects that could be rewarded include a researcher's commitment to pre-registration, data sharing and open science. '"`UNIQ--references-0000001D-QINU`"'
QRPs are actions that concern trespassing "methodological principles that threathen the relevance, valdity, trustworthiness, or efficiency of the study at issue".'"`UNIQ--ref-00000019-QINU`"' QRPs can be divided over four main areas of the research process: the study design, data collection, reporting and collaboration. QRPs are estimated to occur far more frequently then serious misconduct, and therefore pose a threat to trust and truth in science. Under the current system QRPs are rewarded in the form of a higher number and more prestigious publications. Indeed, sloppy science as described above appears to have a strong 'fitness to survive'. '"`UNIQ--ref-0000001A-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-0000001B-QINU`"'
Undergraduate Student / Graduate Student
Research misbehaviors, or questionable research practices (QRPs), are a threat to research integrity and to the validity of science. While research misconduct, in particular fabrication, falsification and plagiarism have a high impact on science, they rarely occur. Research misbehaviours, however, are estimated to occur frequently. While conceivibly having a lower impact on individual cases, the aggregated impact is estimated to be much higher. '"`UNIQ--ref-00000014-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000015-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000016-QINU`"''"`UNIQ--ref-00000017-QINU`"' '"`UNIQ--references-00000018-QINU`"'
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY17567b259ebf90de35513800bc273199
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY7f9099f4d491cc0e28dab41d1332069f
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY26ddcd7b6ca23fa7bfebe678166a7c01
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY3a7458888452b4512237d3ea70cae27a
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY6180fe4eb2bed0ee5a8969f82f9e3657
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERYfb7d6a2a3721a7dd7a7a135d311535b2
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY1505c57fc717ee5be2a0ecd57213c7e6
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERYec3d76930f5ebf0dbca0bd62f12974d4
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERY4ed55e4abd155e2a4e733a97aa64b0b9
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors# QUERYea8bf1c9e5072cf38a90b8b1337d9b8c
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPerverse incentives
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPolarized research
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPredatory publishing
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's
Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man
Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation
Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting
Questionable Research Practices in Study Design
Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project
Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Data CollectionKeeping inadequate notes of the research process
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Study DesignPosing irrelevant research questions
Display Title: Research cultureResearch Integrity Advisors
Display Title: Research misconductFalsification
Research integrity training for PhD students
Display Title: Responsible mentoringResearch integrity training for PhD students
Is there an overall theme which already addresses some relevant points?