]]
A comparison of online versus on-site training in health research methodology: a randomized study
Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content.
Case-based ethics instruction: the influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making
Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity
Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training
Medical students' decisions about authorship in disputable situations: intervention study
Netherlands Position Paper on the Recognition and Rewards of Academics
Online course: Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research in Humans
Responsible Authorship and Peer Review - Columbia RCR Course, Module 3
Teacher guidelines in early bioethical education
University of Montana online research ethics course
Display Title: Conflict of interestsIntellectual conflicts of interest
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
Display Title: Initiatives promoting research integrityThe Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
Networks and projects promoting research integrity
Display Title: Networks and projects promoting research integrityNetworks and projects promoting research integrity
(re)submitting without consent of all authors
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration(re)submitting without consent of all authors
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationFake peer-reviewing
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationUnfair reviewing
Inadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Data CollectionInadequately handle or store data or (bio)materials
Keeping inadequate notes of the research process
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Data CollectionKeeping inadequate notes of the research process
Non-disclosure of changes to the research design
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Study DesignNon-disclosure of changes to the research design
Display Title: Research cultureOpen Science
Serious gaming in research integrity education
Display Title: Responsible mentoringSerious gaming in research integrity education
3 things societies can do to promote research integrity
A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data
A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data
Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct
Australian Codes for the Responsible Conduct of Research
Australian Guide to Managing and Investigating Potential Breaches of the Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research
Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility
Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research
Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched
Changing a grant proposal to meet the reviewers requests
Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea
Cultural differences and communication in the lab
Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions
European Commission Guidance on H2020 Program Ethics Self-assessment
European Commission Guidance on Research on Refugees, Asylum Seekers & Migrants
Faulty Drug Trials Tarnish Japan's Clinical Research
Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review
French Ethics and Scientific Integrity Charter
Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students
Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies
Handling of Sexual Harassment Case Poses Larger Questions at Yale
Head of research integrity initiative in China alleged of reseach misconduct
History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala
How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper
Industry involvement in scientific studies on SSRI's
Inter Academy Partnership Guidance on Doing Global Science
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations
Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity
Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair
Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations
Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees - General Guidelines for Research Ethics
One PhD student, a retraction, and an unconvincing rebuttal
Research Integrity and Conflicts of Interest: The Case of Unethical Research-Misconduct Charges
Research integrity - what is means, why it is important and how we might protect it
Researcher 'Cherry Picked' Data, University Investigation Finds
Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines
Sabotage and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct
Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel
Slovakian Academy of Sciences Ethics Code
Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India
The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
The Ethics of Collecting Genetic Data From Indigenous People
The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach
The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’
The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?
The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
The TRUST Code - a Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships
The Whistleblower and Penn: A Final Accounting of Study 352
The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science
Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations
Up, Up, and Away: Clinical Trials Go International
What is Recklessness in Scientific Research?
Display Title: Collaborative workingCross-boundary collaborations
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
Display Title: Collaborative workingHigh income and low- and middle-income country collaborations
Display Title: Conflict of interestsConflict of interest in peer review
Display Title: Conflict of interestsEditorial conflicts of interest
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results
Display Title: Data Practices and ManagementFAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals
Display Title: FundersConflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals
Display Title: FundersIndustry funded research
Intellectual property rights in research collaborations
Display Title: FundersIntellectual property rights in research collaborations
Display Title: FundersMonitoring funding processes
Initiatives promoting research integrity
Display Title: Initiatives promoting research integrityInitiatives promoting research integrity
Research Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching
Display Title: Initiatives promoting research integrityResearch Integrity and Research Ethics Scenarios for Teaching
Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
Display Title: Initiatives promoting research integrityResearch integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas
Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
Display Title: Peer reviewOpen peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science
Display Title: Peer reviewPost-publication peer review
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsBalancing harms and benefits
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsConfidentiality
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsInformed assent
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsInformed consent
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsPrivacy in research
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsResearch with animals
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsResearch with humans
Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
Display Title: Protecting research subjectsVulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials
Display Title: PublicationAuthorship criteria
Display Title: PublicationOpen access publishing: the new norm?
Display Title: PublicationPublishers - COPE guidelines
Retractions: correcting the scientific literature
Display Title: PublicationRetractions: correcting the scientific literature
Display Title: PublicationStandards of authorship
Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingData driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)
Duplicate publications and secondary publications
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingDuplicate publications and secondary publications
Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingImproper data use (a bias distorting research results)
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingNon-reporting of negative findings
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingOutcome reporting bias
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingP-value hacking
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingPublication bias (positive results)
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingSalami publication
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingSelective citation
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and ReportingSpin of research results
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationGender bias
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationHostile peer review
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationInappropriate authorship
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationSelf-plagiarism
Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in CollaborationTurning a blind eye to breaches of integrity
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Study DesignInappropriate study design
Display Title: Questionable Research Practices in Study DesignPosing irrelevant research questions
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPerverse incentives
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPolarized research
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsPredatory publishing
Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors
Display Title: Questionable research practices & research misbehaviorsQuestionable research practices & research misbehaviors
Prospective registration of clinical trials
Display Title: ReplicabilityProspective registration of clinical trials
Display Title: Research cultureConnecting researchers through ORCID
Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity
Display Title: Research cultureDiscipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity
Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe
Display Title: Research cultureGovernance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe
Display Title: Research cultureImage Integrity
Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct
Display Title: Research cultureInstitutional policies and procedures for research misconduct
Display Title: Research cultureLegal rights of accused scientists
Display Title: Research cultureMental health in academia
Display Title: Research culturePlan S
Reasonable standards for career advancement
Display Title: Research cultureReasonable standards for career advancement
Display Title: Research cultureResearch Integrity Advisors
Display Title: Research cultureResearch Integrity Committees
Research ethics committee members' skills
Display Title: Research cultureResearch ethics committee members' skills
Display Title: Research cultureResearch ethics committees
Display Title: Research cultureScience policy
The impact of the GDPR on scientific data
Display Title: Research cultureThe impact of the GDPR on scientific data
Display Title: Research cultureWhistleblower protection/rights
Display Title: Research metricsAltmetrics
Display Title: Research metricsH-index
Display Title: Research metricsJournal Impact Factor
Display Title: Research misconductFabrication
Display Title: Research misconductFalsification
Display Title: Research misconductPlagiarism
Display Title: Responsible mentoringPeer review card game
Research integrity training for PhD students
Display Title: Responsible mentoringResearch integrity training for PhD students
Research integrity training for diverse disciplines
Display Title: Responsible mentoringResearch integrity training for diverse disciplines
Display Title: Responsible mentoringResponsible supervision
Superb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors
Display Title: Responsible mentoringSuperb Supervision: integrity training for supervisors
Display Title: Responsible mentoringSupervision
Display Title: Responsible mentoringSupervision Guidelines
Display Title: Responsible mentoringThe ConScience App - theatre play
Display Title: Responsible mentoringThe Dilemma Game