View source for Theme:2040cd9d-877c-48de-b430-3d9761aa1e25

{{Theme
|Theme Type=Good Practices
|Has Parent Theme=Theme:B2331451-5a6a-4aa2-a3d5-c68d2c96c8e1
|Title=Reasonable standards for career advancement
|Is About=The Singapore statement specifies that “Research institutions should create and sustain environments that encourage integrity through education, clear policies, and reasonable standards for advancement, while fostering work environments that support research integrity.”<ref>Resnik, David B., and Adil E. Shamoo. "The singapore statement on research integrity." ''Accountability in research'' 18.2 (2011): 71-75.</ref>
<references />
|Important Because=If the standards for career advancement are not reasonable, this can lead to considerable friction between individual researchers and the research institution. This is not fair to the individual researcher, and by creating resentment, can hamper potential collaboration within a research institution,  and can constitute a structural cause for research misconduct.
|Important For=Researchers; Research performing organisations; Policy makers; Research institutions
|Has Best Practice=The Qualification portfolio, implemented by Utrecht UMC. To be described in further detail elsewhere on The Embassy.
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:10e386f6-6881-4d88-bc72-e6391597029e;Resource:216fd809-8eca-4f5e-8cc7-c118b9bfb0cd;Resource:3cf12442-8943-4684-9e9c-8e5128674a79;Resource:90c5a9cf-16c5-441c-b69e-4de6162ae0e2;Resource:Ca0ed587-ac8e-4259-9cc7-74de01941cd1
}}
{{Tags
|Has Timepoint=2011
|Has Location=Singapore
|Has Virtue And Value=Respect; Fairness
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Academic Reputation; Academic Responsibility of University
}}