Difference between revisions of "Theme:4596ffa1-88cd-40bc-b346-a58837206404"
From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Good Practices |Title=Publication |Is About=Publication can be defined as the act of making information or stories available to people in a printed or elec...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Theme Type=Good Practices | |Theme Type=Good Practices | ||
|Title=Publication | |Title=Publication | ||
| − | |Is About=Publication can be defined as the act of making information or stories available to people in a printed or electronic form. | + | |Is About=Publication, in a broad sense, can be defined as the act of making information or stories available to people in a printed or electronic form. Scientific ideas have been communicated in printed form throughout history. Scientific publication in the traditional sense can be traced back to 1665, when the first academic journal was published<ref name=":0">Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., ... & Jackson, L. (2016). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. ''Educational Philosophy and Theory'', ''48''(14), 1401-1425.</ref>. Nowadays, the printed form has been extended with electronic forms of communication, and videos are becoming increasingly popular as well<ref name=":0" />. |
| − | + | Previously, many scientific articles were only available with paid subscriptions. Recently, the possibilities of digital publication led to the rise of [https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:06925397-5843-495d-a22d-3e983bdcb99e Open Acces] publication. This increased the availability of scientific outcomes to those who did not have these subscriptions and also made the results publicly available<ref>Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research.</ref>. Nowadays, one of the hallmarks of 'good publication' is considered to be [https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:29d64b53-eba2-489b-937d-440d6cd118d8 peer reviewed publication]. | |
| − | + | Academic publishing is an entire process on its own and what composes 'good publication' is not straightforward. Traditionally, the popularity of a journal and its impact factor also play a role in the consideration of scientific work. However, it has been shown that articles which have been rejected by popular journals with a high impact factor generally have more citations when eventually published elsewhere<ref>Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'', ''112''(2), 360-365.</ref>. | |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | + | |Important Because=Although it is nearly impossible to define 'good academic publishing', scientific gatekeeping must always be pursued<ref>Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., ... & Jackson, L. (2016). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. <nowiki>''</nowiki>Educational Philosophy and Theory<nowiki>''</nowiki>, <nowiki>''</nowiki>48<nowiki>''</nowiki>(14), 1401-1425.</ref>. | |
| − | + | <references /> | |
| − | |||
| − | |Important Because=Although it is nearly impossible to define 'good academic | ||
|Important For=Early career researchers; Editors; Journal editors; Journal publishers; PhD Students | |Important For=Early career researchers; Editors; Journal editors; Journal publishers; PhD Students | ||
| − | |Has Best Practice=* Nowadays, ‘good publication’ is considered to be peer reviewed publication. Since 1830 peer review became | + | |Has Best Practice=*Nowadays, ‘good publication’ is considered to be peer reviewed publication. Since 1830 peer review became systematic and operational and is considered essential for academic publishing in present times. |
| − | * Journal editors are responsible for the publication process. Their standards are defined in guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which were founded in 1997. | + | *Journal editors are responsible for the publication process. Their standards are defined in guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which were founded in 1997. |
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To | {{Related To | ||
| Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability | + | |Involves=COPE |
| + | |Has Timepoint=Present | ||
| + | |Has Virtue And Value=Accountability; Objectivity; Fairness; Honesty; Openness; Availability; Transparency; Professionalism | ||
| + | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Peer Review; Publication Ethics; Peer review ethics violation; Publication violation | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 4 December 2020
ThemesPublication
What is this about?
Publication, in a broad sense, can be defined as the act of making information or stories available to people in a printed or electronic form. Scientific ideas have been communicated in printed form throughout history. Scientific publication in the traditional sense can be traced back to 1665, when the first academic journal was published[1]. Nowadays, the printed form has been extended with electronic forms of communication, and videos are becoming increasingly popular as well[1].
Previously, many scientific articles were only available with paid subscriptions. Recently, the possibilities of digital publication led to the rise of Open Acces publication. This increased the availability of scientific outcomes to those who did not have these subscriptions and also made the results publicly available[2]. Nowadays, one of the hallmarks of 'good publication' is considered to be peer reviewed publication.
Academic publishing is an entire process on its own and what composes 'good publication' is not straightforward. Traditionally, the popularity of a journal and its impact factor also play a role in the consideration of scientific work. However, it has been shown that articles which have been rejected by popular journals with a high impact factor generally have more citations when eventually published elsewhere[3].
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., ... & Jackson, L. (2016). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1401-1425.
- ↑ Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research.
- ↑ Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(2), 360-365.
Why is this important?
Although it is nearly impossible to define 'good academic publishing', scientific gatekeeping must always be pursued[1].
- ↑ Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., Irwin, R., Locke, K., Devine, N., Heraud, R., ... & Jackson, L. (2016). Towards a philosophy of academic publishing. ''Educational Philosophy and Theory'', ''48''(14), 1401-1425.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
- Nowadays, ‘good publication’ is considered to be peer reviewed publication. Since 1830 peer review became systematic and operational and is considered essential for academic publishing in present times.
- Journal editors are responsible for the publication process. Their standards are defined in guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which were founded in 1997.
The Embassy editorial team, Elsa Amin contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Dec 04, 2020
