H-index

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 18:27, 6 December 2019 by Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Good practices |Title=H-index |Is About=The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

H-index

What is this about?

The h-index, introduced by Jorge Hirsch in 2005, is a metric that conveys both the productivity and citation impact of an individual researcher (1). If a researcher has a h-index of 5 then the researcher has 5 publications with 5 or more citations. A h-index of 75 means that there are 75 publications with 75 or more citations. It thus becomes progressively more difficult to increase one’s h-index, and h-indices are exponentially distributed among scientists.

Why is this important?

The h-index was partially introduced as an improvement over simply counting the quantity of a researcher’s publications. A researcher with 10 publications may have a higher h-index than a researcher with 100 publications.

However, as with any other metric, it is possible to ‘game’, or artificially increase, one’s h-index. Some well-established strategies include:

  • Self-citation (cf. Italian scientists increase self-citations in response to promotion policy (2)
  • Honorary authorship (putting a distinguished researcher on an authorship list often increases citation)
  • Publishing on ‘hot topics’
  • Writing review papers (often more cited than original studies)
Any aspect of citation bias can be taken advantage of for improving h-index.

For whom is this important?

Template:Pages

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6