View source for Instruction:7c159fc9-db27-4623-9432-9c37b8889f89

{{Instruction
|Title=Communities and collaborators
|Has Related Initiative=Initiative:286109fc-03cb-4a08-bd45-c0276eae3079
|Instruction Goal=x
|Has Duration=1
|Important For=All stakeholders in research
}}
{{Custom TabContent Trainee Open}}
{{Instruction Steps Foldout Trainee}}
{{Instruction Perspective Trainee}}
{{Instruction Step Trainee
|Instruction Step Title=Reproducibility Network Award
|Instruction Step Text=<div>
==='''<span lang="EN-GB">What is a Reproducibility Network?</span>'''  ===
</div><div>
<span lang="EN-GB">A national Reproducibility Network is a countrywide peer-led consortium that aims to improve research practices by promoting, supporting, and investigating factors contributing to robust research including, but not limited to, reproducibility, replicability, and Open Science. Activities may include promoting training activities, disseminating best practices, supporting research on reproducible research practices, and advocacy for reproducible and open research.  </span> 
</div><div>
<span lang="EN-GB">A Reproducibility Network typically serves as a hub to connect researchers to exchange ideas and good practices, promoting collaboration among researchers from a range of scientific disciplines. These networks provide infrastructure, facilitate opportunities for researchers and initiatives to support and amplify each other’s efforts, and foster community building as well as shared problem solving.  </span> 
</div><div>
<span lang="EN-GB">Reproducibility Networks can serve as connectors to other stakeholder groups such as universities, funders, or academic publishers.  </span> 

</div>

===Why an organizations should consider setting up their own seed funding award for new Reproducibility Networks?===

*Benefits for setting up an Reproducibility Network?
*Reflections on the TIER2 Reproducibility Network Award

*Resources to set up a Reproducibility Network

===Awardess of the TIER2 Reproducibility Network Award===
TIER2 is proud to announce the two awarded consortia based in Ukraine and Georgia who will receive the monetary awards from the Reproducibility Network open call this summer. Multiple scientific consortia from Horizon Europe “[https://www.era-learn.eu/support-for-partnerships/additional-activities/openness-inclusivness-transparency/widening-and-inclusiveness Widening Participation]” countries submitted applications describing their plans and motivations for establishing a  Reproducibility Network in their home country which TIER2 would support with a €5000 prize.
[[File:Ukraine and Georgia RN.png|center|thumb]]

====Ukrainian Consortium====
The Ukrainian consortium, from the Institute for Open Science and Innovation ([https://www.facebook.com/inosi.org/ INOSI]), [https://twitter.com/optima_open OPTIMA] Project Consortium & [https://lpnu.ua/en Lviv Polytechnic National University], comprises researchers with a broad scientific background, ranging from informatics to chemistry and ecology. The core of the consortium has already experience working together in promoting Open Science in Ukraine, particularly within the OPTIMA project and within the Working Group on the [https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/ukraina-pryiednalas-do-krain-ies-shcho-maiut-zatverdzhenyi-plan-realizatsii-pryntsypiv-vidkrytoi-nauky National Plan for Open Science development] in Ukraine. In response to what motivated them in participating in the open call, they state that: ''“Ukraine needs good science to make good decisions in all spheres. This is particularly relevant during the war and will be needed for the post-war recovery. Reproducibility (as a part of the Open Science concept) can boost the value of academic research in Ukraine making science a real game-changer for progress''”. Regarding their future plans for the Ukrainian Reproducibility Network, they share: “''In the short term, the ambition is to kickstart the network of experts, able to lead the discussion on reproducibility and become a role model on the national level. In the long term, the ambition is, of course, to make reproducibility in research a standard by default. This has to be supported by co-creation and sharing best practices, research on research, and making an impact on national policy. We hope that the network will be viable and ambitious enough to compete for international grant funding to achieve this''”. With regard to the global state of reproducibility & scientific integrity, they say: “''The progress on the global level is visible, but it's only the beginning of a long way forward. The key to achieving the goal is a strong research culture that is often missing in many academic communities. Openness and transparency in performing and communicating research are the basic things to be established''.”

====Georgian Consortium====
The consortium from Georgia, comprises three researchers from different institutions: the Department of Human Anatomy at Tbilisi State Medical University ([https://tsmu.edu/ts/home TSMU]), the Faculty of Medicine at Tbilisi State University ([https://www.tsu.ge/en TSU]), the Institute of Morphology, and the Scientific Department at Caucasus International University ([https://ciu.edu.ge/?lang=en CIU]). Brought together as team members of a research group, they were drafting a proposal for a Horizon Europe (HE) project when their HE grant coordinator alerted them about the TIER2 open call announcement. The team was immediately drawn to it, sharing that: 

“''During our individual and collective research endeavors, we frequently encountered challenges in reproducing experiment results, a phenomenon that was not isolated to our work but across the global research landscape. [...]  a consolidated effort was needed to elevate the state of research in our nation. [...] Moreover, the opportunity to foster a Reproducibility Network (RN) in Georgia provided a platform to unite our nation's fragmented research endeavors, drive standards in research methodologies, and integrate with the global scientific community''”. Regarding their short-term plans after receiving the award, they list the following: “''Organize the foundational meeting, bringing together stakeholders from various Georgian research institutions, to lay down the operational blueprint for the RN; Launch training sessions that cover core skills in reproducibility, data management, and research design; Conduct sessions in universities and community centers to educate and foster trust in scientific research: Set up an official RN website and leverage social media for real-time updates and engagements”. In the long term, the team envisions to “Establish partnerships with International Reproducibility Networks, facilitating knowledge exchange and joint research projects and collaborate with Georgian institutions to advocate for policies emphasizing reproducibility and transparency''”. Their global vision for the state of reproducibility and scientific integrity “''is one where every piece of research, irrespective of its domain or geography, stands the test of time and validation. We envision a scientific landscape where collaboration, transparency, and inclusivity aren't just ideals but are deeply integrated into research methodologies''.” 

They share that the way forward is to prioritize 

“''1)Education & Training: Equip researchers, especially the younger generation, with the necessary tools and knowledge to ensure reproducibility.''

''2)Open Science: Promote Open Access publications, making research universally accessible and subject to broader scrutiny.''

''3)Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Foster collaborations across disciplines, pooling expertise and resources to tackle complex research challenges.''

''4)Technological Integration: Leverage technology, especially AI and data analytics, to aid in ensuring research consistency and integrity.''

''If we could change one thing, it would be the isolated nature of scientific endeavors prevalent in many regions, like Georgia. We would foster a globally interconnected research network where findings, methodologies, and tools are shared seamlessly, accelerating scientific progress and ensuring its robustness''”. 

Lastly, the Georgian consortium highlights what they would change in the global reproducibility landscape if they could: “''1)Revise Academic Incentives: The current "publish or perish" culture sometimes prioritizes quantity over quality. We'd advocate for a system where researchers are rewarded for the reproducibility and integrity of their work, not just the volume. 2)Enhanced Training: Incorporate reproducibility and Open Science training at early academic stages, ensuring that upcoming researchers are well-equipped with the necessary skills and ethos. 3)Global Collaboration Platforms: Creation of digital platforms that facilitate global collaboration, data sharing, and mutual validation of research findings, breaking down silos and fostering a truly global scientific community''.”

====Serbian Consortium====
[[File:Serbian RN.png|center|thumb]]
<span lang="EN-US">[https://tier2-project.eu/ TIER2] is excited to announce the winner of the 2024 Open Call aimed at fostering the establishment of a third Reproducibility Network (RN) in “Widening Participation” countries - Serbia. The goal of Reproducibility Networks is to promote rigorous research practices, facilitate interdisciplinary collaborations and discussions, and enhance the trustworthiness of scientific work. The Serbian consortium will thus receive a €5,000 grant to organise an initial meeting, laying the groundwork for establishing an RN in their country.</span>  

<span lang="EN-US">The Serbian consortium, consisting of nine organisations – six institutes and three faculties –, brings together diverse academic backgrounds with a shared commitment to improving research culture in Serbia. They focus on integrating Open Science, reproducibility, and inclusive policies into institutions and education. The consortium has previously collaborated on initiatives like the [https://nitra.gov.rs/en/ Team for Open Science in Serbia] and [https://nitra.gov.rs/en/inovacije/projekat-saige the Saige project], organising workshops and training to promote open science practices.</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">Motivated by challenges such as low research investment and a scientific system that prioritises quantity over quality, they believe establishing a Reproducibility Network will enhance collaboration and help to address these issues. In the short term, they plan to promote the network through conferences, a kick-off event, and online platforms. Long-term, they aim to integrate Open Science into curricula, incentivise reproducibility, support initiatives beyond major centers, advocate for policy changes, and build international collaborations.</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">Their vision for global reproducibility is one where research is transparent, ethical, and rigorous:</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">''“In this ideal state, researchers across all disciplines adhere to principles of Open Science, ensuring that their methods, data, and results are accessible and reproducible.”''</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">– Matija Zlatar on behalf of the Serbian consortium</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">They advocate for integrating these principles into education, establishing incentive systems, and fostering collaboration:</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">''“We should integrate reproducibility and Open Science practices into university curricula and professional development programs to equip researchers with the necessary skills and knowledge to conduct reproducible research.”''</span> 

<span lang="EN-US">– Matija Zlatar on behalf of the Serbian consortium</span>


====Not sure, if your country has an established Reproducibility Network?====
<span lang="EN-GB">Visit the Global Networks page hosted by the UKRN to find out if a Reproducibility Network already exists in your country: https://www.ukrn.org/global-networks/.</span>  <div></div>
}}
{{Instruction Step Trainee
|Instruction Step Title=Stakeholder communities
|Instruction Step Text=x
}}
{{Instruction Step Trainee
|Instruction Step Title=Primers Inititative
|Instruction Step Text=<span lang="EN-US">The primer initiative from the United Kingdom Reproducibility Network was designed introduce a broad audience to important topics and aspects of open and reproducible scholarship. Each primer is a 3-to-4-page summary document which describes the open or reproducible research practice, why one might be interested in it, and how they can be applied or adopted with thorough guidance.</span> 

More information on the Primers Initative can be found here: <u>[https://www.ukrn.org/primers/ <span lang="EN-US">https://www.ukrn.org/primers/</span>]</u> .
}}
{{Instruction Step Trainee
|Instruction Step Title=Consortia Partners
|Instruction Step Text=<span lang="EN-US">TIER2 brings a unique combination of skills and perspectives, consisting of eleven partners from seven countries, well spread across Europe. The partner organisations all bring a wealth of expertise and experience regarding the target communities (computer science, life science, social science), research culture reform, technical aspects of infrastructure and services, as well as expertise in social sciences and humanities, and gender aspects of R&I.  </span>


==[https://irise-project.eu/ iRise]==
[[File:IRISE .png|thumb]]
iRise aims to deepen understanding of reproducibility drivers, evaluate their effectiveness and provide concrete solutions to enhance scientific evidence.                                                         

Their direct objectives are:

- Develop working definitions and a general framework for diagnosing and addressing reproducibility problems, define costs, benefits and opportunities, and assess the utility of theoretical evidence in forecasting the success of interventions.

- Perform scoping and systematic reviews to identify and evaluate existing interventions to improve reproducibility.

- Explore the interface between reproducibility and research culture, and in particular considerations and mainstreaming of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI).

- Consult and engage key stakeholder groups in prioritising practices and practical tool development for adoption to increase reproducibility.

- Test efficacy and feasibility of specific interventions to increase reproducibility.


==[https://osiris4r.eu/ OSIRIS]==
[[File:OSIRIS .png|thumb]]
Open Science to Increase Reproducibility in Science (OSIRIS) aims to facilitate the shift by systematically gathering knowledge on the underlying drivers, testing effective evidence-based solutions, identifying incentives for reproducibility by stakeholders, and embedding reproducibility in research design.
}}
{{Instruction Remarks Trainee}}
{{Custom TabContent Close Trainee}}
{{Custom TabContent Trainer Open}}
{{Instruction Steps Foldout Trainer}}
{{Instruction Perspective Trainer}}
{{Instruction Remarks Trainer}}
{{Custom TabContent Close Trainer}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}