View source for Resource:3c27a17e-40c7-4402-ba22-9ae57ad68cc2

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Who Rules the Ruler? On the Misconduct of Journal Editors
|Is About=There are very few (published) accounts of editorial misconduct, and those that do exist are almost exclusively focused on medicine-related areas. In the present article we detail a case of editorial misconduct in a rather underexplored domain, the social sciences. This case demonstrates that although legal systems provide different instruments of protection to avoid, compensate for, and punish misconduct on the part of journal editors, the social and economic power unbalance between authors and publishers suggests the importance of alternative solutions before or instead of bringing a lawsuit to court. It puts forward strong arguments in favour of the need for effective regulatory bodies so as to achieve and maintain a culture of research integrity by ''all'' involved in the process.
|Important For=Academic institutions; Journal editors; Peer-reviewers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-010-9107-y
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags}}