Difference between revisions of "Theme:Ba949c86-a4cc-4231-996d-7bf601d9cfa9"
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|Related To Theme=Theme:A6b06cb6-13ec-4d48-9f1e-efc84449f501;Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320;Theme:29d64b53-eba2-489b-937d-440d6cd118d8 | |Related To Theme=Theme:A6b06cb6-13ec-4d48-9f1e-efc84449f501;Theme:6d71bd59-c3bc-4cd5-9c9f-1ab4e53fc320;Theme:29d64b53-eba2-489b-937d-440d6cd118d8 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | {{Tags}} | + | {{Tags |
+ | |Has Virtue And Value=Respect | ||
+ | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Peer review | ||
+ | }} |
Revision as of 15:26, 27 May 2020
Hostile peer review
What is this about?
Why is this important?
Peer review comments offer a space for growth, improvement of articles and increase the quality of reporting . [1]Constrictive criticism is one of the most valuable qualities of a good review. However, when they are hostile they don’t provide adequate feedback. This way, a researcher misses out on the opportunity to improve work. [2] Moreover, this type of review often has a negative impact on self-esteem, especially for young and inexperienced researchers.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
It is difficult to cope with negative criticism, especially when it’s hostile in nature. Always keep in mind that any reviewer is a person, just like you. [1] Maybe they were burdened with work, maybe they had a bad day at the office. It is nothing personal, and can happen to anybody. Think of anything useful that you can take from such a review. Maybe there is advice hidden under that unnecessary criticism? Speak with your superior, talk to your mentor. If you both consider that the review is insulting, consider raising that topic with the editor.
- ↑ Kreiman J. On Peer Review: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Jun 1;59(3):480-3. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0043.
The Embassy Editorial team, Iris Lechner, Natalie Evans contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 28, 2020