Difference between revisions of "Resource:Af2f0202-71bd-4cf4-9213-8fb255e1674c"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance | |Title=Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance | ||
| − | |Is About=This is a factual case. | + | |Is About=The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case. |
| − | |Important For=Researchers | + | |Important Because=There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science. |
| + | |Important For=Researchers; Doctoral students; Early career researchers; Journal publishers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/research-ethics-zero-tolerance-1.9756 | |Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/research-ethics-zero-tolerance-1.9756 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:1e1d90cf-ca7e-45d6-b9ba-c5e4791f6e8a | ||
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:02592695-e4f8-473c-a944-adfe0d8094c0;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8;Theme:047c3bec-1747-499b-b6d5-684cbfb81edd;Theme:E30b6f25-2071-4f6c-80ed-7c22f9d0e4ab | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Timepoint=2008 | |Has Timepoint=2008 | ||
|Has Location=China | |Has Location=China | ||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 25 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Research Ethics: Zero Tolerance
What is this about?
The paper presents the case of Zhejiang University in China where plagiarism, fabrication and falsification was discovered by the new president who is now educating about scientific integrity in China. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
There are no comprehensive statistics on the extent of research misconduct in China — and few ministries, agencies or universities make cases public. Surveys and anecdotal evidence, however, reveal a deep-rooted problem, and suggest that students are learning unethical behaviour alongside their science.
