Difference between revisions of "Resource:20c8233b-7f3b-46f4-969a-882bb832581c"

From The Embassy of Good Science
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Title=Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
 
|Title=Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud
|Is About=This is a factual case.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case describing how an immunologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Luk Van Parijs, was found to be solely responsible for more than 11 incidents of data fabrication in grant applications and papers submitted between 1997 and 2004. <ref>https://www.cell.com/immunity/fulltext/S1074-7613(09)00154-X</ref>
|Important For=Researchers
+
 
 +
Van Parijs avoided jail after several prominent scientists wrote letters begging for clemency on his behalf and was sentenced to home detention, community service and financial restitution.<ref>https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/03/former-mit-researcher-convicted-fraud</ref>
 +
<references />
 +
|Important Because=The case illustrates that coming clean promptly can be a good strategy for those who have committed scientific misconduct.
 +
 
 +
The case can spur awareness of early signs.<ref><nowiki>https://www.nature.com/news/2011/110728/full/news.2011.437.html</nowiki></ref>
 +
<references />
 +
|Important For=Researchers; PI; Supervisors
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Link
 
{{Link
 
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/articles/474552a
 
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/articles/474552a
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
|Involves=Luk Van Parijs
 
 
|Has Timepoint=1997
 
|Has Timepoint=1997
 
|Has Location=USA
 
|Has Location=USA

Latest revision as of 18:34, 25 October 2020

Cases

Biologist Spared Jail For Grant Fraud

What is this about?

This is a factual case describing how an immunologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Luk Van Parijs, was found to be solely responsible for more than 11 incidents of data fabrication in grant applications and papers submitted between 1997 and 2004. [1]

Van Parijs avoided jail after several prominent scientists wrote letters begging for clemency on his behalf and was sentenced to home detention, community service and financial restitution.[2]

Why is this important?

The case illustrates that coming clean promptly can be a good strategy for those who have committed scientific misconduct.

The case can spur awareness of early signs.[1]

  1. https://www.nature.com/news/2011/110728/full/news.2011.437.html

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6