Difference between revisions of "Resource:A9e1f468-b56b-4ae5-91fe-20024d43e154"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control | |Title=Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control | ||
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=This is a factual case. |
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| − | |Important Because= | + | |Important Because=<br /><references /> |
|Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | |Important For=researchers; research leaders; All stakeholders in research; phd students | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Timepoint=2010 | |Has Timepoint=2010 | ||
|Has Location=Sweden | |Has Location=Sweden | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 19 October 2020
ResourcesCases
Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control
What is this about?
This is a factual case.
