Difference between revisions of "Resource:F47b9bc7-c5a5-4b92-918b-438101bd9434"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Education | |Resource Type=Education | ||
|Title=ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics | |Title=ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics | ||
| − | |Is About=The manual is a resource for both researchers designing or attempting to design research, as well as professionals evaluating that research | + | |Is About=The manual is a resource for both researchers designing or attempting to design research, as well as professionals evaluating that research. It offers tools for practical guidance for researchers, research ethics committees and research integrity offices. |
| − | |Important Because=ENERI is a project that aims to improve the exchange between experts in the fields of research ethics and research integrity. | + | |Important Because=ENERI is a project that aims to improve the exchange between experts in the fields of research ethics and research integrity. The manual offers guidance for both fields. It is a living resource, inviting engagement rather than consumption. It contains no technical or technocratic instruction, but rather seeks to instill deliberation around issues of research ethics and research integrity. |
|Important For=All stakeholders in research; Researchers | |Important For=All stakeholders in research; Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 08:19, 14 August 2020
ResourcesEducation
ENERI manual-research integrity and ethics
What is this about?
The manual is a resource for both researchers designing or attempting to design research, as well as professionals evaluating that research. It offers tools for practical guidance for researchers, research ethics committees and research integrity offices.
Why is this important?
ENERI is a project that aims to improve the exchange between experts in the fields of research ethics and research integrity. The manual offers guidance for both fields. It is a living resource, inviting engagement rather than consumption. It contains no technical or technocratic instruction, but rather seeks to instill deliberation around issues of research ethics and research integrity.
