Difference between revisions of "Theme:3a32df5c-e6e8-45f9-8132-434db3985a65"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Theme |Theme Type=Good practices |Title=Peer review card game |Is About=Peer review card exchange game was developed by researchers from the University of Split School of Me...") |
(mobo import migrateAll) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Theme | {{Theme | ||
| − | |Theme Type=Good | + | |Theme Type=Good Practices |
|Title=Peer review card game | |Title=Peer review card game | ||
|Is About=Peer review card exchange game was developed by researchers from the University of Split School of Medicine as a hands-on training session for a summer school on peer review (1). It is an educational tool designed to inform young researchers about integrity in peer review. The game is free to use, and available [http://europeanscienceediting.eu/articles/a-peer-review-card-exchange-game/ here]. | |Is About=Peer review card exchange game was developed by researchers from the University of Split School of Medicine as a hands-on training session for a summer school on peer review (1). It is an educational tool designed to inform young researchers about integrity in peer review. The game is free to use, and available [http://europeanscienceediting.eu/articles/a-peer-review-card-exchange-game/ here]. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
| − | |||
{{Tags}} | {{Tags}} | ||
Revision as of 11:41, 9 January 2020
ThemesPeer review card game
What is this about?
Peer review card exchange game was developed by researchers from the University of Split School of Medicine as a hands-on training session for a summer school on peer review (1). It is an educational tool designed to inform young researchers about integrity in peer review. The game is free to use, and available here.
Why is this important?
Peer review is an important part of scientific process, because it identifies both quality and possible flaws in submitted research, and offers room for improvement. However, the peer review process is not perfect, and is susceptible to a number of conflicts, dilemmas and insecurities (2,3).
For whom is this important?
The Embassy Editorial team, The Embassy editorial team, Ružica Tokalić, Iris Lechner, Andrijana Perković Paloš, Ružica Tokalić contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 22, 2021
