Research Ethics in a Global Environment
Research Ethics in a Global Environment
To encourage learners to consider the types of ethics issues that are associated with research in a global environment and how they might be addressed.
The learning outcomes
At the end of this module, learners will be able to:
- Discuss the specific ethics challenges associated with international collaborative research.
- Explain when benefit sharing is required and what constitutes fair benefit sharing.
- Distinguish between different types of ethics dumping and identify the causes.
- Explain the measures that can be taken to prevent ethics dumping.
Main Benefits of International Collaborative Research
Irecs Research Ethics in a Global Environment Feedback Accordion-Step2
Francis Kombe - Collaborative research
Jan Van Der Westhuizen
What is Benefit Sharing?
What Constitutes Appropriate Benefits?
Benefit sharing is a legal requirement for all countries that have adopted the CBD. But what constitutes appropriate benefits for those who share their resources in research? Click on the hotspots to see some suggestions.
Appropriate Benefit Sharing
The last word on benefit sharing goes to Reverend Mario Mahongo, who was Chair of the South African San Council, 2000 – 2018.
Ethics Dumping
Humanities’ challenges require global research, yet global research can have a dark side. Ethics dumping. When researchers from privileged settings offshore unethical research to lower income settings, that's ethics dumping. It can happen on purpose, but also due to lack of awareness and cultural misunderstandings.
Research from the Trust Group identified six types of ethics dumping, even though others might still emerge. Probably the best known type of ethics dumping is the application of double standards, where exploitative practises that are not accepted in a high income setting are used in a lower income setting. For instance, 3 clinical trials on cervical cancer screening methods were conducted in India from 1998 to 2015.
254 women in the North screening arm died due to cervical cancer. A no screening control arm would not have been allowed in the USA but was accepted by the US funders for these clinical trials in India.
Another commonly known type of ethics dumping is also called helicopter research. This occurs when researchers from a higher income setting fly into a lower income setting to conduct a study and make use of resources without fair benefit sharing. For example, in 1995, a research team from the US university obtained blood samples from 10s of thousands of impoverished Chinese villages. A US based company linked to the university received multimillion dollar investments on the basis of the collected genetic information.
One type of ethics dumping, which is often not done on purpose, involves culturally inappropriate conduct. This is a particular challenge in global research. For instance, in many regions of the world, community assent or approval will be necessary before research can be conducted ethically. It is the responsibility of the researchers to find out what is culturally appropriate conduct in any new setting.
A related issue that is also linked to insufficient local knowledge involves a lack of due diligence. This can put local research participants at risk. For instance, in Kenya, where sex work is illegal, collecting personal data about sex workers can put them at high risk of incrimination.
Dishonesty in global research is another form of ethics dumping which occurs regularly. For instance, where funding proposals require participation from lower income countries, researchers are recruited with promises of equal rights and equal budgets, which are not honoured. Later, research participants are promised feedback on the study they are recruited to, but the researchers do not return and the promises are not kept.
Finally, patronising conduct is also a form of ethics dumping. If research teams from a higher income country assume an air of knowing best, even in a foreign setting, the collaboration is disrespectful and can lead to inappropriate or insensitive results.
Ethics dumping damages trust and adds unfair burdens onto those who are already burdened. It is therefore essential that researchers work as closely as possible with local collaborators and reflect together on ways to prevent ethics dumping.
Preventing Ethics Dumping
Preventing Ethics Dumping cont.
The !Khwas ttu Kids
The final video in this module is the winning video from the FGVA sponsored rap, dance and music competition held for the TRUST project. "We are the San", from !Khwa ttu Kids is a representation of the values of fairness, respect, care and honesty through song, film and dance. Congratulations to the team at !Khwa ttu.
End of Module Quiz
Module Evaluation
Thank you for taking this irecs module!
Your feedback is very valuable to us and will help us to improve future training materials.
We would like to ask for your opinions:
1. To improve the irecs e-learning modules
2. For research purposes to evaluate the outcomes of the irecs project
To this end we have developed a short questionnaire, which will take from 5 to 10 minutes to answer. Your anonymity is guaranteed; you won’t be asked to share identifying information or any sensitive information. Data will be handled and stored securely and will only be used for the purposes detailed above. You can find the questionnaire by clicking on the link below.
This link will take you to a new page; https://forms.office.com/e/K5LH08FyvQ
Thank you!Glossary of Terms
Equality
Equality implies that people are treated equally in terms of rights, or access to services etc. without discrimination or unfair advantage. In the context of social justice and human rights, equality involves equal access to resources and opportunities, as well as ensuring that individuals are not disadvantaged or marginalised. This can include efforts to address systemic inequalities, discrimination, and barriers to full participation in society.
Equity
Equity refers to fairness in the distribution of resources, opportunities, and rights. It involves ensuring that everyone has access to what they need to thrive and reach their full potential, regardless of their background, identity, or circumstances. Unlike equality, which aims to treat everyone the same, equity recognizes that different individuals or groups may require different levels of support or resources to achieve equal outcomes.
Intellectual property rights
Intellectual property rights (IPR) refer to the legal rights granted to individuals or entities to protect their creations or inventions, which can include inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, symbols, names, and images used in commerce. These rights typically include patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets, granting creators or owners exclusive rights to use and control their intellectual property for a specified period. These rights enable individuals and organizations to benefit financially from their innovations and creativity while fostering innovation and creativity by providing incentives for research, development, and investment.
Traditional knowledge
Bibliography
Articles and books
Chatfield, K., Schroeder, D., Guantai, A., Bhatt, K., Bukusi, E., Adhiambo Odhiambo, J., ... & Kimani, J. (2021). Preventing ethics dumping: the challenges for Kenyan research ethics committees. Research Ethics, 17(1), 23-44. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1747016120925064 (Free to download)
Schroeder, D. (2007). Benefit sharing: it’s time for a definition. Journal of medical ethics, 33(4), 205-209.
Schroeder, D., & Pisupati, B. (2010). Ethics, justice and the convention on biological diversity. Available at: https://clok.uclan.ac.uk/9695/1/Ethics,%20Justice%20and%20the%20convention.pdf (Free to download)
Schroeder, D., Cook, J., Hirsch, F., Fenet, S., & Muthuswamy, V. (2018). Ethics dumping: case studies from north-south research collaborations. Springer Nature. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-64731-9 (Free to download)
Schroeder, D., Chatfield, K., Singh, M., Chennells, R., & Herissone-Kelly, P. (2019). Equitable research partnerships: a global code of conduct to counter ethics dumping (p. 122). Springer Nature. Available at: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-15745-6 (Free to download)
Schroeder, D., Chatfield, K., Muthuswamy, V., & Kumar, N. K. (2021). Ethics Dumping–How not to do research in resource-poor settings. Journal of Academics Stand Against Poverty, 1(1), 32-55. Available at: https://journalasap.org/index.php/asap/article/view/4 (Free to download)
Wynberg, R., Schroeder, D., & Chennells, R. (2009). Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing: lessons from the San-Hoodia case (Vol. 15). Berlin: Springer.
Research ethics codes
The San Code of Research Ethics, available from: https://www.globalcodeofconduct.org/affiliated-codes/
The TRUST Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships, available from: https://www.globalcodeofconduct.org/
Videos
More videos can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/@trustandprepared1000