Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 10:33, 13 February 2020 by Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs)
Cases

Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control

What is this about?

This paper builds on the concepts of competing logics and institutional fields to analyze a serious case of medical and scientific misconduct at a leading research institute, Karolinska in Sweden, home to the Nobel Prize in Medicine[1].

Why is this important?

The incidence of revealed fraud and dishonesty in academia is on the rise, and so is the number of studies seeking to explain scientific misconduct[1].

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Where
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6