Maintenance:ExportThemesTags

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 09:23, 8 September 2020 by 0000-0001-9246-6817 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{#ask: Theme |?Involves |?Has_Location |?Has_Timepoint |?Has_Virtue_And_Value |?Has_Good_Practice_And_Misconduct |?Related_To_Research_Area }}")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 WhoWhereWhenVirtues & ValuesGood Practices & MisconductResearch Area
Cognitive dissonance and moral distressSH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Collaborative workingReliability
Respect
Collaborative research
Conflict of interestsHonesty
Transparency
Conflict of interest
Financial conflict of interest
Bias
Data Practices and Management
Development and Value of National Research Integrity Codes
Dialogue versus debateCollegialityEthical DilemmaSH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Dutch National Survey on Research IntegrityNSRIThe Netherlands2020Honesty
Transparency
Scrupulousness
Independence
Responsibility
Epistemic virtuesHonestyMoral reasoning
Responsible research
SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
FundersHonesty
Accountability
Funders’ responsibilities
How to be a good lab partnerCollaborative spirit
Humility
Gender Equality
Fairness
Professionalism
Good Practice
Misconduct
Mertonian norms
Moral conflict and moral dilemmaReliability
Conscientiousness
Collegiality
Fairness
Responsibility
Balancing Harm and BenefitsSH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Peer reviewHonesty
Accountability
Reliability
Respect
Peer Review
Poor mentoring or supervision of early career researcherersALLEAAccountability
Respect
Mentor-trainee relationship
Mentorship responsibilities
Preprint serversErnesto Galbán RodríguezTransparency
Accountability
Open access
Communication
Open science
Protecting research subjectsRespect
Accountability
Balancing harms and benefits
Vulnerable and non-competent subjects
Research with Humans
SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
LS - Life Sciences
PublicationCOPEPresentAccountability
Objectivity
Fairness
Honesty
Openness
Availability
Transparency
Professionalism
Peer Review
Publication Ethics
Peer review ethics violation
Publication violation
Qualitative research
Questionable Research Practices in Analysis and Reporting
Questionable Research Practices in Collaboration
Questionable Research Practices in Data Collection
Questionable Research Practices in Study Design
ReplicabilityBrian Nosek
Michèle B Nuijten
Edward Diener
John Ioannidis
Reliability
Accountability
Transparency
Peer Review
Pre-registrations
Collaborative research
Data Management
SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
LS - Life Sciences
Replicability in the HumanitiesLex Bouter
Rik Peels
Transparency
Accountability
Publication Ethics
Data Management
Responsible research
SH - Social Sciences and Humanities
Research cultureRespect
Research metricsAccountability
Fairness
Reliability
Honesty
Precision
Trustworthiness
Altmetrics
Research misconductHonesty
Accountability
Reliability
Research misconduct
Responsible mentoringReliability
Honesty
Respect
Accountability
Collegiality
Professional courtesy and fairness
Autonomy
Collaborative research
Power abuse
The decision on iceLS 07.08 - Health services, health care research
Values and normsGuy Widdershoven
Jan-Helge Solbakk
Ethics
Virtues in research integrityResponsible research
Collaboration In ResearchOffice of Research IntegrityMaltaAccountability
Respect
Responsibility
Collaborative research
Cross-boundary collaborationsAccountability
Reliability
Collaborative research
High income and low- and middle-income country collaborationsAutonomy
Collegiality
Professional courtesy and fairness
Collaborative research
International collaboration
Power abuse
Conflict of interest in peer reviewHonestyConflict of interest
Conflict of interest: a research integrity and research ethics perspectiveCOPE
ICMJE
ENERI
Objectivity
Neutrality
Impartiality
Transparency
Integrity
Conflict of interest
Editorial conflicts of interestAccountability
Transparency
Conflict of interest
Intellectual conflicts of interestHonesty
Transparency
Accountability
Conflict of interest
Funders’ responsibilities
Institutional responsibilities
Bias
The influence of pharmaceutical company on drug availabilityLS 07.11 - Medical ethics
LS 07.03 - Pharmacology, pharmacogenomics, drug discovery and design, drug therapy
LS 04.06 - Cancer and its biological basis
Anonymisation and pseudonymisation
Data management plansTransparency
Availability
Open access
Data management
Grant applications
FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of resultsHonesty
Transparency
Data Management
Data sharing
Feedback of findings in genome-wide association studies
How to select trustworthy repositoriesDigital Curation Centre2015Transparency
Availability
Open access
Data management
Imputation of missing data in clinical trialsVictor Urbiola-Salvador30/05/2022Accountability
Care
Excellence
Bias
Clinical trials
LS 02.10 - Bioinformatics
LS 02.12 - Biostatistics
Methods to increase data availability
Sharing and preserving data in repositoriesTransparency
Availability
Open access
Data management
Paper Mills
Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposalsHonestyConflict of interest
Funders’ responsibilities
Industry funded researchHonesty
Transparency
Funders’ responsibilities
Collaborative research
Collaborative science
... further results
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6