(re)submitting without consent of all authors
(re)submitting without consent of all authors
What is this about?
Why is this important?
Gaining consent from all authors before submitting a manuscript demonstrates honesty and respect for colleagues. A number of cases have drawn attention to this questionable research practice. For example, a co-author found out a conference paper was re-published in another journal by the first author, without getting consent from all authors.[2] Moreover, that same first author later translated the conference paper to their native language and published it in a journal written in that language, still listing all authors without consent. In this way, the co-author self-plagiarized without being aware of it. This case led to a request to the journal to retract the article.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
Other information
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
References
- ↑ ICMJE (2019) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Accessed via: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
- ↑ Academia.stackexchange (2015). What to do after I was named as co-author on a paper, without my consent? Accessed via: https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49573/what-to-do-after-i-was-named-as-co-author-on-a-paper-without-my-consent
- ↑ COPE (2013). Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors. Accessed via: https://publicationethics.org/case/paper-submitted-publication-without-consent-or-knowledge-co-authors
Iris Lechner, Natalie Evans contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 28, 2020