(re)submitting without consent of all authors
(re)submitting without consent of all authors
What is this about?
Why is this important?
Gaining consent from all authors before submitting a manuscript demonstrates honesty and respect for colleagues. A number of cases have drawn attention to this questionable research practice. For example, a co-author found out a conference paper was re-published in another journal by the first author, without getting consent from all authors.[2] Moreover, that same first author later translated the conference paper to their native language and published it in a journal written in that language, still listing all authors without consent. In this way, the co-author self-plagiarized without being aware of it. This case led to a request to the journal to retract the article.
For whom is this important?
What are the best practices?
Iris Lechner, Natalie Evans contributed to this theme. Latest contribution was Oct 28, 2020
Other information
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
- ↑ ICMJE (2019) Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Accessed via: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
- ↑ Academia.stackexchange (2015). What to do after I was named as co-author on a paper, without my consent? Accessed via: https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49573/what-to-do-after-i-was-named-as-co-author-on-a-paper-without-my-consent
- ↑ COPE (2013). Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors. Accessed via: https://publicationethics.org/case/paper-submitted-publication-without-consent-or-knowledge-co-authors