Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 16:16, 29 June 2021 by 0000-0002-1723-7560 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

Divorce study felled by a coding error gets a second chance

What is this about?

A paper was given the chance for correction, following detection of errors in data coding and therefore in results. Such mistakes often mean that papers are retracted. This is a factual case.

Why is this important?

An interesting example of a case, signifying that not all retractions are due to conscious manipulation of data/results by the papers' authors.

For whom is this important?

Other information

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6