The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 13:37, 19 August 2021 by 0000-0002-3240-4478 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field

What is this about?

This factual case describes a covert sociological study on the work culture of nightlife bouncers. The author describes both practical and ethical problems he encountered during his research which resulted from its covert nature. However, he argues that the research would not have been possible without its secrecy.

Why is this important?

The practice of covert research in sociology has been a long subject of debate. It has received much criticism due to the deception of research subjects, among other objections.[1][2] Nonetheless, covert research methods may also have beneficial effects, as outlined in the present case. This may be especially true in the fields of sociology and social sciences, where it is important not to disturb the behavioral and cultural patterns under study. It is important to take both the beneficial effects and ethical objections into consideration when determining the justifiability of covert research practice. The present case may aid in the identification of beneficial consequences, while it may also help to prepare sociologists for the problems they may encounter during a covert study.

  1. Homan, R.  (1980)  ‘The Ethics of  Covert  Methods’, British  Journal of  Sociology 31 (1): 36–59.
  2. Homan, R. (1991) The Ethics of Social Research. London: Macmillan.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6