Handling self-admissions of fraud

From The Embassy of Good Science
Revision as of 13:38, 24 November 2021 by 0000-0002-6817-5697 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Handling self-admissions of fraud |Is About=In November 2014, the first author of a decade old paper in our journal and a 15-year-old pa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Cases

Handling self-admissions of fraud

What is this about?

In November 2014, the first author of a decade old paper in our journal and a 15-year-old paper from another journal informed us that he faked the data in two figure panels in the paper in our journal and one figure panel in the paper in the other journal. The main gist of the manipulation was loading unequal amounts or delayed loading of gel lanes.

Self-admission of data falsification is a serious charge that is difficult to disprove, and we felt a challenge to identify evidence to counter or support this type of allegation. As general guidelines, we felt there were three types of evidence that could help resolve the standoff:

(1) compelling original raw data with evidence for or against unequal or delayed gel loading;

(2) verified replication already existing within the published literature; and

(3) as a last resort, a replication study performed by a wholly independent laboratory.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6