Difference between revisions of "Resource:0e24b4e6-b6c1-449f-98c3-d3133028fae3"

From The Embassy of Good Science
(Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=The Swiss report on homeopathy: A case study of research misconduct |Is About=. |Important Because=. |Important For=Researchers }} {{Lin...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Resource
 
{{Resource
 
|Resource Type=Cases
 
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=The Swiss report on homeopathy: A case study of research misconduct
+
|Title=The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct
|Is About=.
+
|Is About=This is a factual case.
|Important Because=.
 
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
|Important For=Researchers
 
}}
 
}}
Line 9: Line 8:
 
|Has Link=https://smw.ch/article/doi/smw.2012.13594
 
|Has Link=https://smw.ch/article/doi/smw.2012.13594
 
}}
 
}}
{{Related To}}
+
{{Related To
 +
|Related To Theme=Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
 +
}}
 
{{Tags
 
{{Tags
 
|Has Timepoint=2012
 
|Has Timepoint=2012

Latest revision as of 21:32, 26 May 2020

Cases

The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct

What is this about?

This is a factual case.

For whom is this important?

Other information

When
Virtues & Values
Good Practices & Misconduct
Research Area
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
5.1.6