View source for Resource:2bbdffa2-234c-4cbc-a087-94c1681d19d9

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View
|Is About=This is a factual anonymized case about a person who worked as a medical writer for almost 11 years.  During this time she has written a variety of texts including the occasional ghostwritten article. In the article she describes her experience, motivation and her views about the problem of fraud in authorship.
|Important Because=This is a real case which might be useful for discussions on ghost authorship.
|Important For=Researchers; PhD Students; Research integrity trainers; medical researchers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001071
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e;Theme:540f8241-c354-4249-8b63-6bdc2e74bdf8;Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db
|Related To Instruction=Instruction:6cc77174-4f7b-48a6-95f3-eeb4dadcb0a3
}}
{{Tags
|Has Timepoint=2000
|Has Location=United States
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty; Integrity; Professional courtesy and fairness
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Authorship; Ghostwriting; Ghost authorship
|Related To Research Area=Clinical Medicine
}}