View source for Resource:36c3c63d-3041-43d1-8543-0315d17e4939

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=What should a journal do when a scientist who committed misconduct submits a new paper?
|Is About=Linked to the case of Olivier Voinnet, the blog presents an example of publishers' response to authors whose past papers have been retracted or have had corrections issued on them.
|Important Because=Whether it is purposeful attempt to deceit and knowingly one manipulates data, images, results, or, corrections in publications are the outcome of honest mistakes, this blog raises the editors' dilemma in accepting new submission by these authors. An interesting example for discussion mainly for those involved in publishing.
|Important For=Journal publishers; Journal editors; Academic staff; Publishers
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://retractionwatch.com/2017/08/24/journal-scientist-committed-misconduct-submits-new-paper/
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:4603212b-89c1-41d9-a4f5-c8fa706cc0b1
}}
{{Tags}}