Difference between revisions of "Resource:4c699ab2-c114-4fc0-ad52-f1917928fcad"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide |
| − | |Is About= | + | |Is About=In 2014 in a stemcell research institute in Japan a research misconduct case came to light. The case was excessively covered by the media, with the media not only portraying the accused scientists as perpetrators, but criticizing the entire research centre. One of the members of the research centre committed suicide, causing upheaval in the Japanese research scene. As the case describes, the damage of the scientific misonconduct reaches far beyond the misconduct itself. |
| − | + | |Important Because=Scientific misconduct cases should be dealt with carefully, with appropriate protections in place for those that did not commit the misconduct. The 'side effects' of misconduct, including reputational damage, should be minimized or restored when a person or institute has been inaccurately accsued of misconduct. | |
| − | + | |Important For=Researchers; Early career researchers; PhD students; Research performing organisations; Research funding organisations; Media | |
| − | |||
| − | |Important Because= | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Link | {{Link | ||
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/collateral-damage-how-one-misconduct-case-brought-a-biology-institute-to-its-knees-1.17427 | |Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/collateral-damage-how-one-misconduct-case-brought-a-biology-institute-to-its-knees-1.17427 | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{Related To}} | + | {{Related To |
| + | |Related To Resource=Resource:3d565816-370d-43a0-8cef-acb00f74f325 | ||
| + | |Related To Theme=Theme:A12b4bab-b331-46d1-93e0-dc9e9c5453cd;Theme:5f65272f-6e95-4768-8236-bc821a97f3d8 | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| − | |||
|Has Timepoint=2014 | |Has Timepoint=2014 | ||
|Has Location=Japan | |Has Location=Japan | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty; Accountability | |Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty; Accountability | ||
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Falsification | |Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Fabrication; Falsification | ||
| − | |Related To Research Area= | + | |Related To Research Area=LS - Life Sciences; LS 03.12 - Stem cell biology |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:12, 5 October 2020
ResourcesCases
A Japanese developmental biology center, scientific misconduct and suicide
What is this about?
In 2014 in a stemcell research institute in Japan a research misconduct case came to light. The case was excessively covered by the media, with the media not only portraying the accused scientists as perpetrators, but criticizing the entire research centre. One of the members of the research centre committed suicide, causing upheaval in the Japanese research scene. As the case describes, the damage of the scientific misonconduct reaches far beyond the misconduct itself.
Why is this important?
Scientific misconduct cases should be dealt with carefully, with appropriate protections in place for those that did not commit the misconduct. The 'side effects' of misconduct, including reputational damage, should be minimized or restored when a person or institute has been inaccurately accsued of misconduct.
For whom is this important?
ResearchersEarly career researchersPhD studentsResearch performing organisationsResearch funding organisationsMedia
