Difference between revisions of "Resource:639f8445-2428-41df-8784-8c1a80a110f3"
From The Embassy of Good Science
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Resource | {{Resource | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial |
| − | |Is About=A study compared two ways of nursing premature | + | |Is About=A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case. |
|Important Because=In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies. | |Important Because=In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies. | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
Latest revision as of 12:55, 10 August 2020
ResourcesCases
False results, premature infants and the CNEP trial
What is this about?
A study compared two ways of nursing premature infants who require respiratory support. False results were generated by the study. This is a factual case.
Why is this important?
In this specific context, false results mislead not only health care staff and medical researchers, but also the parents of premature babies.
