Difference between revisions of "Resource:7de2dab5-11f2-4827-b3d8-c4fbf24295a6"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Resource |Resource Type=Cases |Title=Simultaneous submission leading to duplicate publication: Scientific misconduct rears its ugly head |Is About=All medical journals requi...") |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Title=Simultaneous submission leading to duplicate publication: Scientific misconduct rears its ugly head | |Title=Simultaneous submission leading to duplicate publication: Scientific misconduct rears its ugly head | ||
|Is About=All medical journals require submission of a contributors’ form signed by all the authors declaring that “Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere.” It seems that sometimes authors do not read the declaration thoroughly or perhaps understand the implications of signing it<ref>http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2013;volume=9;issue=4;spage=147;epage=148;aulast=Bhandarkar</ref>. | |Is About=All medical journals require submission of a contributors’ form signed by all the authors declaring that “Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere.” It seems that sometimes authors do not read the declaration thoroughly or perhaps understand the implications of signing it<ref>http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2013;volume=9;issue=4;spage=147;epage=148;aulast=Bhandarkar</ref>. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important Because=The practice of simultaneous submission is considered a violation of medical publishing ethics and is frowned upon for several reasons<ref>http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2013;volume=9;issue=4;spage=147;epage=148;aulast=Bhandarkar</ref>. | |Important Because=The practice of simultaneous submission is considered a violation of medical publishing ethics and is frowned upon for several reasons<ref>http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2013;volume=9;issue=4;spage=147;epage=148;aulast=Bhandarkar</ref>. | ||
| + | <references /> | ||
|Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | |Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
{{Related To}} | {{Related To}} | ||
{{Tags | {{Tags | ||
| + | |Has Timepoint=2008 | ||
|Has Location=India | |Has Location=India | ||
|Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | |Has Virtue And Value=Honesty | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 10 February 2020
ResourcesCases
Simultaneous submission leading to duplicate publication: Scientific misconduct rears its ugly head
What is this about?
All medical journals require submission of a contributors’ form signed by all the authors declaring that “Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under my/our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere.” It seems that sometimes authors do not read the declaration thoroughly or perhaps understand the implications of signing it[1].
Why is this important?
The practice of simultaneous submission is considered a violation of medical publishing ethics and is frowned upon for several reasons[1].
