Difference between revisions of "Resource:8367e13a-b836-4237-bfdd-e2d9dd491329"
From The Embassy of Good Science
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
Marc.VanHoof (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Resource Type=Cases | |Resource Type=Cases | ||
|Title=Bothered and bewildered, but not bewitched | |Title=Bothered and bewildered, but not bewitched | ||
| − | |Is About=. | + | |Is About=This case is about article amendments which unfortunately became a daily practice. |
| − | |Important Because=. | + | |Important Because=When an article is being published, one assumes that the co-authors are aware of its publication. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Journal | ||
| + | |||
| + | Factual | ||
|Important For=Researchers | |Important For=Researchers | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 29 April 2020
ResourcesCases
Bothered and bewildered, but not bewitched
What is this about?
This case is about article amendments which unfortunately became a daily practice.
Why is this important?
When an article is being published, one assumes that the co-authors are aware of its publication. Unfortunately, that is not always the case.
Journal
