View source for Resource:A25a891e-4b0e-499c-bd17-18535d44dbc1

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Academic and research misconduct in the PhD: Issues for students and supervisors
|Is About=This case presents four factual anonymised cases of misconduct practices occurring in PhD supervision. More specifically: a) engagement with regulatory processes (i.e., the case of deviation from the initially ethics-approved data collection procedures without informing the relevant regulatory body); b) problems of knowledge or understanding transfer (i.e., a misunderstanding between student and supervisor in relation to intellectual property); c) culturally specific issues in the PhD study (i.e., the writing of disjoined, sometimes plagiarised, paragraphs in the thesis of a student whose first language was not English); d) academic theft (i.e., a student discovered her ex-supervisor had published work containing a literature review very similar to her own).
|Important Because=These are thought provoking examples of roles and responsibilities in the PhD student-supervisor relationship. They are real examples that can be used for reflection for supervisors and students alike, as well as for teaching purposes.
|Important For=PhD Students; Supervisors
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691707000664
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Theme=Theme:Bd54dd3d-50ed-4f42-b5fb-473f2391714a;Theme:177ca35b-14f3-4f62-8bb2-f9cf9db28a70
}}
{{Tags}}