View source for Resource:Ad5f6a82-0543-4ca6-b9cf-90a90b72439e

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Guidelines
|Title=Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences' Guideline on Authorship in Scientific Publications
|Is About=According to the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, disputes regarding authorship attributions are the most frequently encountered form of research misconduct cases. Thus, this guideline serves to analyze existing guidelines on authorship practices and to formulate additional recommendations regarding the same.
|Important Because=Many kinds of authorship related disputes exist, from clear breaches of integrity such as omission of authorship to gray areas such as disagreements on the order of attribution. In light of the rapid rise in the number of publications, such conflicts are also on the rise. Many such gray areas have not been previously addressed - neither by ethical guidelines nor by legislation. This guideline builds on an analysis of previous authorship related guidance and sets forth newer recommendations concerning authorship criteria, disputes and their management.
|Important For=Authors; Research institutions; Research Integrity Officers; publishers
|Has Best Practice=- Obligations to list authors

- Authorship requirements

- Procedure for determining authorship

- Order of authorship

- Authors' responsibility

- Acknowledgements
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://api.swiss-academies.ch/site/assets/files/4413/akademien_autorschaft_en.pdf
}}
{{Related To
|Related To Resource=Resource:76cae4bc-6cc7-4e54-b97e-92d332b1253b
|Related To Theme=Theme:Cbe88760-7f0e-4d6d-952b-b724bb0f375e;Theme:30b4cf4f-e284-4837-ac3d-0a75fab9060a;Theme:783ea7a3-ab76-4622-a968-eb8c3efa7893;Theme:83f33f33-e9ba-4589-b450-92e3992a22db
}}
{{Tags
|Involves=The Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences
|Has Timepoint=2013
|Has Location=Switzerland
|Has Virtue And Value=Resepct; Transparency; Responsibility
}}