LoginSign up

Pages with the most revisions

From The Embassy of Good Science

250 nss ordered by recently added

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  1. AboutCertifiedTrainers‏‎ (118 revisions)
  2. VIRT2UE Training Guide‏‎ (69 revisions)
  3. Modified Dilemma Game‏‎ (54 revisions)
  4. Maintenance‏‎ (46 revisions)
  5. About‏‎ (44 revisions)
  6. Introduction to Research Integrity‏‎ (41 revisions)
  7. Debate and Dialogue‏‎ (39 revisions)
  8. VIRT2UE Certification‏‎ (34 revisions)
  9. The INSPIRE project‏‎ (33 revisions)
  10. Main Page‏‎ (30 revisions)
  11. Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity‏‎ (27 revisions)
  12. Self Declaration Approach - a Reflection on the Varieties of Goodness in Research‏‎ (26 revisions)
  13. The Middle Position‏‎ (26 revisions)
  14. AboutMaySymposium‏‎ (24 revisions)
  15. Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling‏‎ (24 revisions)
  16. VIRT2UE Videos‏‎ (23 revisions)
  17. Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions‏‎ (23 revisions)
  18. Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes‏‎ (23 revisions)
  19. Themes‏‎ (23 revisions)
  20. EnTIRE final conference‏‎ (19 revisions)
  21. AllTrials campaign‏‎ (19 revisions)
  22. Altmetrics‏‎ (19 revisions)
  23. Virtues in research integrity‏‎ (19 revisions)
  24. Protection of Research Participants‏‎ (18 revisions)
  25. Virtues and Norms‏‎ (18 revisions)
  26. Practicing Reflection in Dialogue‏‎ (18 revisions)
  27. Dilemmas in daily practice‏‎ (18 revisions)
  28. Resources‏‎ (18 revisions)
  29. Research integrity officers in Europe‏‎ (17 revisions)
  30. Training Informations‏‎ (17 revisions)
  31. Prospective registration of clinical trials‏‎ (17 revisions)
  32. VIRT2UE Training Guide in Turkish‏‎ (17 revisions)
  33. Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science‏‎ (16 revisions)
  34. Balancing harms and benefits‏‎ (16 revisions)
  35. Research with humans‏‎ (16 revisions)
  36. Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes‏‎ (16 revisions)
  37. Cognitive dissonance and moral distress‏‎ (16 revisions)
  38. Authorship criteria‏‎ (15 revisions)
  39. Dialogue versus debate‏‎ (15 revisions)
  40. Terms of service‏‎ (15 revisions)
  41. The Embassy's Newsletter - July 2021‏‎ (14 revisions)
  42. Privacy statement‏‎ (14 revisions)
  43. 02 - The Seven Steps Method: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (14 revisions)
  44. Research integrity training for PhD students‏‎ (14 revisions)
  45. FAIR principles: sharing data for maximisation of results‏‎ (14 revisions)
  46. Reasonable standards for career advancement‏‎ (14 revisions)
  47. Rights of Citizen Scientists‏‎ (14 revisions)
  48. Data management plans‏‎ (13 revisions)
  49. Peer review card game‏‎ (13 revisions)
  50. Scientific Misconduct at an Elite Medical Institute: The Role of Competing Institutional Logics and Fragmented Control‏‎ (13 revisions)
  51. Dubious Peer Reviews Lead to 10 Retractions‏‎ (13 revisions)
  52. Interim Practice Work‏‎ (13 revisions)
  53. VIRT2UE final conference‏‎ (13 revisions)
  54. Post-publication peer review‏‎ (13 revisions)
  55. Introduction: Guidelines and Discrepancies‏‎ (13 revisions)
  56. The impact of the GDPR on scientific data‏‎ (12 revisions)
  57. The Dilemma Game‏‎ (12 revisions)
  58. Publication, Dissemination and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  59. Safeguards, Data-sharing and the Disclosure of Sensitive Results: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (12 revisions)
  60. Research Integrity Committees‏‎ (12 revisions)
  61. Values and norms‏‎ (12 revisions)
  62. VIRT2UE train-the-trainer program‏‎ (12 revisions)
  63. Peer review‏‎ (12 revisions)
  64. Founders‏‎ (12 revisions)
  65. Confidentiality‏‎ (12 revisions)
  66. The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity‏‎ (12 revisions)
  67. Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's‏‎ (12 revisions)
  68. Research ethics committee members' skills‏‎ (12 revisions)
  69. Initiatives promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  70. Belgian Code of Ethics for Scientific Research‏‎ (11 revisions)
  71. Retractions: correcting the scientific literature‏‎ (11 revisions)
  72. Science policy‏‎ (11 revisions)
  73. European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  74. Selective citation‏‎ (11 revisions)
  75. Organizing the training‏‎ (11 revisions)
  76. Research misconduct‏‎ (11 revisions)
  77. Responsible Open Science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  78. Moral conflict and moral dilemma‏‎ (11 revisions)
  79. Collaborative working‏‎ (11 revisions)
  80. Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises‏‎ (11 revisions)
  81. The Netherlands‏‎ (11 revisions)
  82. Journal Impact Factor‏‎ (11 revisions)
  83. Conflicts of interest in citizen science‏‎ (11 revisions)
  84. European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity (ENERI)‏‎ (11 revisions)
  85. Networks and projects promoting research integrity‏‎ (11 revisions)
  86. Grey areas of plagiarism: 10 scenarios to discuss with students‏‎ (10 revisions)
  87. Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials‏‎ (10 revisions)
  88. The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field‏‎ (10 revisions)
  89. Research with animals‏‎ (10 revisions)
  90. Polarized research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  91. Misrepresenting the characteristics of research participants in psychiatric studies‏‎ (10 revisions)
  92. Open peer review - transparent way of gatekeeping science‏‎ (10 revisions)
  93. Whistleblower protection/rights‏‎ (10 revisions)
  94. The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-Plagiarism’‏‎ (10 revisions)
  95. Quality of research outputs and data sets‏‎ (10 revisions)
  96. Final Findings of Scientific Misconduct‏‎ (10 revisions)
  97. The Netherlands‏‎ (10 revisions)
  98. From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark‏‎ (10 revisions)
  99. Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct - perspective of a research ethics board chair‏‎ (10 revisions)
  100. Philosopher Earns 14th Retraction for Plagiarism‏‎ (10 revisions)
  101. Salami publication‏‎ (10 revisions)
  102. Scientist Ousted From Cancer Study Declines to Testify to House Panel‏‎ (10 revisions)
  103. Predatory publishing‏‎ (10 revisions)
  104. Maintenance:ExportThemes‏‎ (10 revisions)
  105. Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)‏‎ (10 revisions)
  106. 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  107. Legal rights of accused scientists‏‎ (10 revisions)
  108. Informed consent‏‎ (10 revisions)
  109. The Olivieri Debacle: Where Were the Heroes of Bioethics?‏‎ (10 revisions)
  110. Supervision‏‎ (10 revisions)
  111. Privacy in research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  112. The Saga of Korean Women Who Provided Eggs for Embryonic Stem Cell Research‏‎ (10 revisions)
  113. High income and low- and middle-income country collaborations‏‎ (10 revisions)
  114. Dutch National Survey on Research Integrity‏‎ (10 revisions)
  115. Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems‏‎ (9 revisions)
  116. Cross-boundary collaborations‏‎ (9 revisions)
  117. Publishers - COPE guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  118. Artificial tracheas and severe research misconduct‏‎ (9 revisions)
  119. Informed assent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  120. Research Integrity Advisors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  121. Legal Liabilities in Research: Early lessons From North America‏‎ (9 revisions)
  122. Discipline specific codes and guidelines on research integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  123. Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man‏‎ (9 revisions)
  124. Declaration of Helsinki‏‎ (9 revisions)
  125. The Rotterdam Dilemma Game‏‎ (9 revisions)
  126. INTEGRITY‏‎ (9 revisions)
  127. Good Epidemiological Practice Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  128. SPOC: RCR through supervision and mentoring course‏‎ (9 revisions)
  129. 3 Ways to Blow the Whistle‏‎ (9 revisions)
  130. Self-plagiarism‏‎ (9 revisions)
  131. The Ethics of Pharmaceutical Research Funding: A Social Organization Approach‏‎ (9 revisions)
  132. Supervision Guidelines‏‎ (9 revisions)
  133. Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  134. Research metrics‏‎ (9 revisions)
  135. Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas‏‎ (9 revisions)
  136. Misconduct Ruling is Silent on Intent‏‎ (9 revisions)
  137. Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors‏‎ (9 revisions)
  138. H-index‏‎ (9 revisions)
  139. Aboutcertifiedtrainers‏‎ (9 revisions)
  140. Baltimore Case - In Brief‏‎ (9 revisions)
  141. Standards of authorship‏‎ (9 revisions)
  142. How I Was Nearly Duped into 'Authoring' a Fake Paper‏‎ (9 revisions)
  143. Open access publishing: the new norm?‏‎ (9 revisions)
  144. Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals‏‎ (9 revisions)
  145. The Aftermath of Scientific Fraud‏‎ (9 revisions)
  146. Non-reporting of negative findings‏‎ (9 revisions)
  147. Criticism Swirls Around High-Profile History Book about North Korea‏‎ (9 revisions)
  148. The role of moral philosophy in the divide between science and non-science‏‎ (9 revisions)
  149. Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors' Responsibility‏‎ (9 revisions)
  150. 05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (9 revisions)
  151. Community‏‎ (8 revisions)
  152. Research collaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  153. 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper‏‎ (8 revisions)
  154. A Review of the Impact of the TeGenero Trial on the Design, Conduct, and Ethics of FIM Trials‏‎ (8 revisions)
  155. Research Procedures and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  156. Outcome reporting bias‏‎ (8 revisions)
  157. German Research Foundation's Recommendations for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice‏‎ (8 revisions)
  158. Data Practices, Data Management and FAIR Principles: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  159. Responsible supervision‏‎ (8 revisions)
  160. Inappropriate study design‏‎ (8 revisions)
  161. Intellectual property rights in research collaborations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  162. Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations‏‎ (8 revisions)
  163. Research culture survey (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  164. Imposter Syndrome‏‎ (8 revisions)
  165. Translate the VIRT2UE e-learning modules into your own language‏‎ (8 revisions)
  166. P-value hacking‏‎ (8 revisions)
  167. Research Environments and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  168. Guest Authorship, Mortality Reporting, and Integrity in Rofecoxib Studies‏‎ (8 revisions)
  169. Image Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  170. 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  171. The Unfortunate Experiment‏‎ (8 revisions)
  172. Funders‏‎ (8 revisions)
  173. Epistemic virtues‏‎ (8 revisions)
  174. EQIPD (Enhancing Quality in Preclinical Data)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  175. Human Rights Education for Legal Professionals (HELP) Online Training‏‎ (8 revisions)
  176. Publication bias (positive results)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  177. Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (8 revisions)
  178. Aboutcollaboration‏‎ (8 revisions)
  179. Open Science‏‎ (8 revisions)
  180. Bothered and Bewildered But not Bewitched‏‎ (8 revisions)
  181. Research ethics committees‏‎ (8 revisions)
  182. Research culture statement (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (8 revisions)
  183. History, Ethics and the Presidential Commission on Research in Guatemala‏‎ (8 revisions)
  184. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition‏‎ (8 revisions)
  185. Spin of research results‏‎ (8 revisions)
  186. Digital humanities‏‎ (8 revisions)
  187. What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds‏‎ (8 revisions)
  188. Jesse's Intent‏‎ (8 revisions)
  189. Researcher Accused of Breaching Research Ethics Faces GMC‏‎ (8 revisions)
  190. Court Denies Appeal of HIV Fraudster’s 57-month Prison Sentence‏‎ (8 revisions)
  191. Psychology Grad Student Faked Data‏‎ (8 revisions)
  192. 03 - Four Quadrant Approach: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity‏‎ (8 revisions)
  193. Denmark‏‎ (8 revisions)
  194. Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  195. Inaccurate representation of results in the media‏‎ (7 revisions)
  196. Research Problems at Australian University Hit the News‏‎ (7 revisions)
  197. Simultaneous Submission Leading to Duplicate Publication‏‎ (7 revisions)
  198. Anonymity Revisited‏‎ (7 revisions)
  199. Irish National Policy Statement on Ensuring Research Integrity‏‎ (7 revisions)
  200. Diner Pensant Workshop‏‎ (7 revisions)
  201. Bulgaria‏‎ (7 revisions)
  202. European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) Code of Practice for Fieldwork Training‏‎ (7 revisions)
  203. Declaration of Istanbul‏‎ (7 revisions)
  204. Image Manipulation Detection‏‎ (7 revisions)
  205. Research culture group (University of Glasgow)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  206. Research culture‏‎ (7 revisions)
  207. Perioperative Mischief: The Price of Academic Misconduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  208. Data driven hypotheses without disclosure (‘HARKing’)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  209. UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research‏‎ (7 revisions)
  210. Path2Integrity Campaign‏‎ (7 revisions)
  211. Seven Ways to Plagiarise: The Magazine Surprise‏‎ (7 revisions)
  212. 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics‏‎ (7 revisions)
  213. Data protection in a global pandemic (COVID-19)‏‎ (7 revisions)
  214. PhD-pizza - Gathering for PhD-candidates to talk freely‏‎ (7 revisions)
  215. When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects‏‎ (7 revisions)
  216. Intellectual conflicts of interest‏‎ (7 revisions)
  217. France‏‎ (7 revisions)
  218. Research fraud on MMR vaccines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  219. Bioethicists Call for Investigation Into Nutritional Experiments on Aboriginal People‏‎ (7 revisions)
  220. Peer Review in the Social Sciences and Humanities‏‎ (7 revisions)
  221. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Publication Recommendations‏‎ (7 revisions)
  222. Ethics, Human Rights and HIV Vaccine Trials in Low-Income Settings‏‎ (7 revisions)
  223. Deception by Research Participants‏‎ (7 revisions)
  224. A Case Study about Anonymization and Secondary Use of Qualitative Data‏‎ (7 revisions)
  225. The learning curve - theatre play #MeTooAcademia‏‎ (7 revisions)
  226. Implications of a Single Highly Cited Article on a Journal and Its Citation Indexes‏‎ (7 revisions)
  227. UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct‏‎ (7 revisions)
  228. Plan S‏‎ (7 revisions)
  229. The Threat to Scientific Integrity in Environmental and Occupational Medicine‏‎ (7 revisions)
  230. Conflict of interest in peer review‏‎ (7 revisions)
  231. Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India‏‎ (7 revisions)
  232. Retracted WHO Reports on Opioid Guidelines‏‎ (7 revisions)
  233. Path2Integrity Handbooks for Teachers and Trainers‏‎ (7 revisions)
  234. Geology Paper Has a Rocky Road is Now Retracted‏‎ (7 revisions)
  235. The Legacy of the Hwang Case: Research Misconduct in Biosciences‏‎ (7 revisions)
  236. Finland‏‎ (7 revisions)
  237. Perverse incentives‏‎ (6 revisions)
  238. VIRT2UE‏‎ (6 revisions)
  239. Austria‏‎ (6 revisions)
  240. SIENNA - Stakeholder-informed ethics for new technologies with high socio-economic and human rights impact‏‎ (6 revisions)
  241. Europe‏‎ (6 revisions)
  242. Forbidden Knowledge‏‎ (6 revisions)
  243. Institutional policies and procedures for research misconduct‏‎ (6 revisions)
  244. Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials during the COVID-19 Pandemic‏‎ (6 revisions)
  245. Monitoring funding processes‏‎ (6 revisions)
  246. Contributors‏‎ (6 revisions)
  247. Plagiarism‏‎ (6 revisions)
  248. Theme:A22bd155-7f88-4750-aa9c-cba9ad72cbec‏‎ (6 revisions)
  249. Reviewing, Evaluating, Editing and Research Integrity: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project‏‎ (6 revisions)
  250. Gender bias‏‎ (6 revisions)
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://embassy.science:443/wiki/Special:MostRevisions"
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
More information

Your platform for research integrity and ethics

Privacy statementTerms of serviceTake down policyContact
Let us keep you posted

Twitter Logo Dark.svg

The EnTIRE and VIRT2UE projects have received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research programme under grant agreements N 741782 and N 787580.

5.1.6