CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS (2017)

What is this about?

The Code of Ethics for Scientists (2017) is Latvia’s national framework for promoting research integrity and open scientific practice. It sets out core values of honesty, accountability, professional courtesy, and responsible use of resources, linking them to reproducibility, credibility, and public trust in science. The code outlines expectations for researchers, supervisors, institutions, funders, and journals in planning, conducting, publishing, and reviewing research. It establishes clear rules on authorship, citation, conflict of interest management, supervision, and fair peer review, while also defining misconduct and procedures for investigation with proportional sanctions and learning outcomes. Education is emphasised, ensuring that students and staff are trained in responsible conduct as an essential skill. The code addresses emerging challenges such as open science, digital tools, data management, and new dissemination practices, embedding integrity in contemporary research workflows. Equity and diversity are highlighted as integral to integrity, fostering inclusive environments free from discrimination and harassment. Practical tools such as checklists, templates, and FAQs support day-to-day application. Annexes provide case studies, international references, and contact points for reporting, making the code both a policy framework and a practical handbook.

Why is this important?

CODE OF ETHICS FOR SCIENTISTS distils national expectations for research integrity in Latvia and clarifies what researchers and institutions in Latvia need to do to comply. It reduces ambiguity, aligns local practice with international norms, and offers actionable steps that improve transparency, reproducibility, and equitable access. For policy leads, it is a benchmark; for authors and administrators, it is a practical checklist. Published by nan in 2017, it is a credible reference to cite in institutional policies, training, and grant documentation.

For whom is this important?

All stakeholders in research

Other information