Search by property
From The Embassy of Good Science
This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.
List of results
- Research ethics training of trainers: Developing capacity of Bolivian health science and civil society leaders + (2016)
- European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research (ESOMAR) International Code on Market, Opinion and Social Research and Data Analytics + (2016)
- Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering + (2016)
- Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context + (2016)
- A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals. + (2016)
- A New Challenge to Research Ethics: Patients-Led Research (PLR) and the Role of Internet Based Social Networks + (2016)
- Fourth retraction for neuroscientist sentenced for fraud + (2016)
- Journalist who fabricated his reports + (2016)
- Organised Crime Against the Academic Peer Review System + (2016)
- COPE Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports + (2016)
- What Universities can Learn from one of Science’s Biggest Frauds + (2016)
- Position Paper on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Austria + (2016)
- The Swiss National Science Foundation and National Research Council's Regulations on scientific misconduct + (2016)
- Author accused of stealing research and publishing under their name + (2016)
- Data anonymity + (2016)
- Institution alleges that paper includes fabricated data + (2016)
- Croatia's science minister rejects calls to resign amid plagiarism scandal + (2008)
- Retraction notice - fake email peer-review + (2016)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Humanities, Law and Theology (NESH, Norway) + (2016)
- Guidelines for Research Ethics in Science and Technology (NENT, Norway) + (2016)
- Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Guidelines for the Investigation of Misconduct in Research + (2016)
- UKRIO's Position statement on research involving security-sensitive material + (2016)
- Position statement of the UKRIO: Statutory regulation of research integrity + (2016)
- UKRIO's Good practice in internet-mediated research + (2016)
- Advisory Report of the Committee on Exploration of the Revision of the Dutch Code of Conduct + (2016)
- How Earnest Research Into Gay Genetics Went Wrong + (2017)
- Speculations and Ethical Concerns in the Conduct of Outsourced Clinical Trials in India + (2017)
- UK Research Council's Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct + (2017)
- Fostering Integrity in Research + (2017)
- Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review + (2017)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Switzerland + (2017)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Austria + (2017)
- Online Posts Damage a Researcher's Reputation + (2017)
- Serious Accusation of Negligence of Ethical Principles in Human Sciences + (2017)
- HEIRRI courses + (2017)
- Good Practice and Reporting Cases in Finland + (2017)
- A University of Liverpool investigation determined that a former researcher there fabricated his data + (2017)
- The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition + (2017)
- Applying Research Findings to Enhance Pre-Practicum Ethics Training + (2017)
- EnRRIch project- tool for educators + (2017)
- Office for Human Research Protections; Short videos about human research protections + (2017)
- The Professionalism and Integrity in Research Program: Description and Preliminary Outcomes + (2017)
- Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition + (2017)
- Meta-assessment of bias in science + (2017)
- Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment + (2017)
- Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications + (2017)
- Treatment of missing data in follow-up studies of randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of the literature + (2017)
- The publication of controversial views + (2017)
- Postdoc randomly chose data during figure assembly + (2017)
- Inexperienced researcher gives too much caffeine to subjects + (2017)
