Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• UK Research Integrity Office's Code of Practice for Research  + (All stakeholders in research)
• The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity  + (All stakeholders in research)
• Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage  + (Administrators)
• European Charter of Patients' Rights  + (Clinical ethics consultants)
• MedTech Europe Code of Ethical Business Practice  + (Ethics committee members)
• Facebook Manipulated 689,003 Users' Emotions For Science  + (Policy-makers)
• Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct  + (Academic institutions)
• Make research misconduct involving agri inputs a criminal fraud: CCFI  + (Academic institutions)
• Institutional codes of conduct for research integrity  + (Academic staff)
• Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations  + (Research funding organisations)
• Ethics Framework and Guidelines for Participatory Processes in the Activities of Research Funding Organizations  + (Research funding organisations)
• The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity - 2017 Edition  + (All stakeholders in research)
• Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law assurance framework for AI systems: A proposal  + (Activists)
• Successful and timely uptake of artificial intelligence in science in the EU  + (Academic institutions)
• Addressing the socio-economic consequences of research misconduct  + (Funders)
• Reviewing the Ethics of AI in health and healthcare  + (Research Ethics Experts)
• Reviewing the Ethics of Biobanking  + (Research Ethics Experts)
• Reviewing the Ethics of Extended Reality  + (Research Ethics Experts)
• Reviewing the Ethics of Genome Editing  + (Research Ethics Experts)
• Brussels Declaration on Open Access (2012), Federal Science Policy, Wallonia-Brussels Federation, and Flemish Ministry for Economy, Science, and Innovation  + (Researchers)
• Access to Scientific Information (by the Inter-Academy Panel) (2013), InterAcademy Panel  + (researchers)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science  + (All stakeholders in research)
• Learning from the RFO Pilots- Policy Brief  + (Research funding agencies and organisations (RFOs))
• Putting citizens at the centre of research and innovation- Policy brief  + (Research and innovation funding organisations (RFOs))
• Toolbox for Research Integrity  + (Ethics Committees and Research Institutions)

• Embedding a comprehensive ethical dimension to organoid-based research and resulting technologies (Policy brief 2)  + (Policymakers and Regulators)

• Recommendations to mainstream citizen science in policy  + (Research Institutions and Universities)
• UNDERSTANDING AND ACTING FOR A HEALTHY PLASTIC FREE MEDITERRANEAN SEA, e-learning  + (Marine and environmental researchers)
• The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity  + (Researchers)
• POIESIS Recommendations 4, 5, 6: Societal Integration and Public Engagement in Science  + (Civil society organizations and citizen groups)
• POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation  + (Researchers and Research Institutions)
• Studying colonial artefacts with integrity  + (Academic institutions)
• Studying colonial artefacts with integrity  + (Academic institutions)
• Local resources on improving science: basic study  + (PhD Students)
• Predatory publishing  + (PhD Students)
• Altmetrics  + (PhD students)
• Training modules and guidelines on mentorship  + (Supervisors)
• The Rotterdam Dilemma Game  + (Early career researchers)
• Peer review card exchange game  + (Early career researchers)
• Responsible conduct of research toolkit  + (All stakeholders in research)
• Research Integrity Committees  + (phd students)
• Research integrity in practice: dealing with everyday dilemmas  + (phd students)
• Finnish Guidelines on Doctoral Supervision and Review  + (Postdocs)
• Committee on Publication Ethics Guidelines on How to Handle Authorship Disputes  + (Early career researchers)
• Questionable research practices & research misbehaviors  + (Students)
• Improper data use (a bias distorting research results)  + (Principal investigators)
• Outcome reporting bias  + (Students)
• P-value hacking  + (Students)
• Perverse incentives  + (Students)
• Publication bias (positive results)  + (Students)
• Self-plagiarism  + (Students)