Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Research Ethics and integrity for the GREEN transition (Policy brief), 2025  + (Researchers)
• Inspiring and Anchoring Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (Policy Brief), 2022  + (Researchers)
• POIESIS Recommendations 1, 2, 3: Research Integrity and the Organisation of Science  + (Researchers)
• RDA Endorsed Recommendations & Outputs  + (Researchers)
• Policy Brief 1: Glossary for Academic Integrity  + (Researchers)
• Challenges and Innovative Changes in Research Ethics Reviews (Policy brief), 2025  + (Researchers)
• ENERI Decision Tree  + (Researchers)
• Training and Resources in Research Ethics Evaluation (TRREE) e-learning  + (Researchers)
• Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct  + (Research Ethics Committees and Integrity Offices)
• Promoting Integrity as an Integral Dimension of Excellence in Research (Policy brief)  + (Researchers)
• Societal Trust In Science, Research and Innovation (RFOs)-Policy Brief  + (Researchers)
• Societal Trust in Science, Research and Innovation (RPOs)- Policy brief  + (Researchers)
• The PREPARED Seesaw: a Digital Public Engagement Initiative  + (General public)
• Addressing environmental justice in research & innovation  + (Researchers)
• Applying Ecofeminist Ethics to Research  + (Early-career researchers (PhD students, post-docs))
• Micromodule care ethics and environmental ethics  + (All stakeholders in research)
• The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity  + (Researchers)
• Just Transition (part two): Green Colonialism and Energy Justice  + (Researchers)
• Training after the pandemic - How research can contribute to a better future  + (Researchers and PhD candidates)
• Embedding a comprehensive ethical dimension to organoid-based research and resulting technologies (Policy brief 2)  + (Policymakers and Regulators)
• POIESIS Recommendations 7, 8, 9: Science Communication and Chains of Mediation  + (Researchers and Research Institutions)
• Code of responsible conduct for the field of organoids and organoid related technologies  + (Researchers and Scientists)
• POIESIS Policy Recommendations for Promoting Trust in Science through Integrity, Integration, and Communication  + (Academic institutions)
• POIESIS Recommendations 4, 5, 6: Societal Integration and Public Engagement in Science  + (Civil society organizations and citizen groups)
• Hungarian Decree on the system of integrity management at public administration bodies and the procedural rules of receiving lobbyists  + (Researchers in public institutions)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Producers  + (Academic institutions)
• Research Ethics Compass  + (Early-career researchers and graduate students)
• The Trust Code Supplement - A Global Code of Conduct for Research in Fragile Settings  + (Researchers, Research Ethics Communities and Research Integrity Offices)
• Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for researchers and ethics reviewers)  + (Community Advisory Boards)

• Agriculture researcher up to 15 retractions for fake peer review  + (Reserchers)
• Biobanking: Technology Basics  + (Reserchers)
• Irish National Forum on Research Integrity's Report on Fostering a Climate of Excellence for Irish Research  + (Reserchers)
• Questionable Research Practices in Study Design  + (Reserchers)
• The Dublin City University's Code of Good Research Practice  + (Reserchers)
• The Reward Alliance  + (Reserchers)
• The University of Oslo's 10 commandements for ethical practice in research  + (Reserchers)
• The decision on ice  + (Reserchers)

• Conflicts of interest in the review of grant proposals  + (Research funding organisations)
• Hostile peer review  + (Scientists)
• Perverse incentives  + (Students)
• Self-plagiarism  + (Students)
• 'I am really sorry': Peer Reviewer Stole Text for Own Paper  + (Researchers)
• Post-publication peer review  + (Journal editors)
• Image Integrity  + (Researchers)
• The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity  + (Senior researchers)
• Peer review card game  + (phd students)
• Peer review  + (Scientists)
• Turning a blind eye to breaches of integrity  + (Researchers)
• Research misconduct  + (Students)
• Selective citation  + (Students)
• Procrastinating Reviewer  + (Funders)
• Attempting to Assure Accuracy  + (Journal publishers)
• Ethical guidance for research with a potential for human enhancement  + (Academic staff)
• Ten journals denied 2020 Impact Factors because of excessive self-citation or “citation stacking”  + (Authors)
• Good-Practice Guide for Scientific-Academic Publishing (CSIC, Spain)  + (Researchers)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Policymakers  + (Government)
• VERITY Recommendations for Fostering Trust in Science: Science Communicators  + (Journalists)
• Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for students and citizen scientists)  + (Citizen Scientists)