Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Five steps to decide what data to keep: a checklist for appraising research data  + (Academic institutions)
• Path2Integrity Campaign  + (Academic institutions)
• Quality History Education in the 21st Century Principles and Guidelines  + (Policy makers)
• The Case of the Damaged Baby  + (Academic staff)
• Bias in hiring  + (Women in academia)
• Reaction to bias  + (Women in academia)
• A Letter of Resignation  + (Academic staff)
• Design and Development of a Course in Professionalism and Ethics for CDIO Curriculum in China  + (Fan)
• Hostile peer review  + (Scientists)
• Perverse incentives  + (Students)
• Conflict of interests  + (Researchers)
• Research misconduct  + (Students)
• Faking it in academia- the rise of authorship fraud  + (Academic institutions)
• Collaboration dispute  + (Academic staff)
• Long distance collaboration  + (collaborating groups)
• "Met de billen bloot" (airing your dirty laundry)  + (Researchers)
• SOPs4RI Guidelines on Supervision - PhD guidelines  + (Academic staff)
• Mertonian norms  + (everyone)
• Climate science controversies and the demand for access to empirical data  + (Citizen Scientists)
• INSPIRE Checklist  + (Policy makers)
• Publishers - COPE guidelines  + (phd students)
• Research Integrity Committees  + (phd students)
• Open access publishing: the new norm?  + (phd students)
• Who Owns the Field Notes  + (Academic staff)
• The university and the responsible conduct of research: who is responsible for what?  + (graduate students)
• VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast  + (Academic institutions)
• VLIR Mind the GAP Podcast  + (Academic institutions)

• Conflict of interests  + (health care professionals)
• Consent and assent in research on children  + (health care professionals)
• Ethics and children's rights: learning from past mistakes  + (health care professionals)
• Ethics in global digital psychiatry: balancing innovation and responsibility  + (health care professionals)
• Institutional Pathology and the Death of a Mentally Ill Young Man  + (health care professionals)
• Qualitative research  + (health care professionals)
• Research misconduct  + (health care professionals)
• Telemedicine: Bridging Gaps or Creating New Challenges?  + (health care professionals)
• The decision on ice  + (health care professionals)
• Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations  + (health care professionals)
• Vulnerable and non-competent subjects in clinical trials  + (health care professionals)
• Supervision  + (health care professionals)

• Inappropriate authorship  + (PhD Students)
• Spin of research results  + (Students)
• Collaborative Working Between Academia and Industry: An Educational Scenario by the EnTIRE project  + (Academic staff)
• Research misconduct  + (Students)
• The impact of the GDPR on scientific data  + (Students)
• Premature release of clinical trials data  + (researchers)
• A bullshit excuse? My lab notebook “was blown into a manure pit”  + (Research institutions)
• The AAP report on circumcision: Bad science + bad ethics = bad medicine  + (Human rights defenders)
• Unlicensed usage of medical devices on patients: a case of accusations  + (Research Ethics Committees)
• Responsible conduct of biomedical research : collaborative research  + (All stakeholders in research)
• Intellectual conflicts of interest  + (Research performing organisations)
• The Orphan Embryos: A Case Study in Bioethics  + (Decision makers)
• Publishing complications and patient safety  + (Research Ethics Committees)
• Fraud, errors and gamesmanship in experimental toxicology: GM potatoes  + (Laboratory researchers)
• A Medical Ghostwriter’s Personal View  + (Researchers)
• Guidelines for Tailoring the Informed Consent Process in Clinical Studies  + (Clinical researchers)
• Handling of Scientific Dishonesty in the Nordic Countries: Early stages in the 1990's  + (researchers)
• ICH Guidelines  + (medical researchers)
• The European Union Good Clinical Practice Directive  + (Clinical researchers)