Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Oturum esnasında, iyilik kavramı üzerine g … Oturum esnasında, iyilik kavramı üzerine grup halinde yapacağınız yorumlamalar için bir eğitmen tarafından yönlendirileceksiniz. Bu amaçla:#Araştırmada iyiliğin türlerini öğrenecek;#Küçük gruplar içerisinde kendi öz beyan formunuz üzerine fikir yürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacak (yorumlama sürecinizi yapılandırmak için kullanabileceğiniz sorulara pratik ipuçları kısmından ulaşabilirsiniz);#Farklı iyilik türlerinin nasıl kategorize edilebileceği üzerine fikir yürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacak;#Araştırmalarda Dürüstlük Konusunda Avrupa Davranış Kodu (ECoC)’nda iyilik tipolojilerinin nasıl örneklendirildiğini belirleyerek kodun içeriği üzerine fikir yürütecek ve yorumlamalarda bulunacaksınız.Bu oturum, siz ve diğer katılımcıların öz beyan formlarında verdiğiniz bilgiler üzerinden ilerleyecektir.Bu alıştırmanın adımlarına ilişkin genel bilgilere eğitimi alanlar için hazırlanmış olan talimatlar kısmından ulaşabilirsiniz.olan talimatlar kısmından ulaşabilirsiniz.)
Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Oturumdan birkaç hafta önce eğitmeniniz si … Oturumdan birkaç hafta önce eğitmeniniz sizden oturum için hazırlık yapmanızı talep edecektir. Bunun için eğitmeniniz tarafından sizlere gönderilen öz beyan formunu doldurmanız ve oturumdan en az bir hafta önce eğitmeninize göndermeniz gerekecektir. Öz beyan formu, iyilik hakkındaki sezgileriniz üzerine fikir yürütmenize olanak sağlayacak ve eğitmen tarafından oturum esnasında sizin sezgilerinizi de tartışmaya dahil edilebilmek amacıyla kullanılacaktır.ahil edilebilmek amacıyla kullanılacaktır.)
Öz beyan yaklaşımı, araştırmada iyiliğin farklı şekilleri üzerine fikir yürütme + (Oturumdan birkaç hafta önce katılımcılarla … Oturumdan birkaç hafta önce katılımcılarla iletişime geçerek kendilerinden öz beyan formunu doldurmalarını isteyin. Ödev için bir son teslim tarihi belirleyin ve katılımcılardan doldurdukları formları oturumdan en az bir hafta önce size iletmelerini talep edin. Öz beyan formu, katılımcıların iyilik türleri üzerine fikir yürütmesine yardımcı olacaktır. Aynı zamanda toplayacağınız formlar sizin için oturum esnasında üzerinde tartışacağınız içeriği belirleyecektir.Katılımcılara oturuma gelirken yanlarında doldurdukları formun (basılı ya da elektronik) bir kopyasını getirmelerini söyleyin ve formda verdikleri yanıtların grup içerisinde tartışılacağını hatırlatın.yanıtların grup içerisinde tartışılacağını hatırlatın.)
Orta Yol + (Oturumdan önce, alıştırma esnasında paylaşılan bilgilerin siz ve oturumdaki diğer katılımcılarca gizli tutulacağına ilişkin bir gizlilik beyanı imzalamanız istenecektir.)
Erdemler ve Normlar + (Oturumdan önce, alıştırma esnasında paylaşılan bilgilerin gizli kalacağı ve eğitimden sonra imha edileceğine ilişkin bir gizlilik beyanı imzalamanız istenecektir.)
Erdemler ve Normlar + (Oturumu katılımcıları karşılayarak ve alış … Oturumu katılımcıları karşılayarak ve alıştırmaya kısa bir giriş yaparak başlatın. Alıştırmanın amacını doğru bir biçimde açıklayın. Bu alıştırma, her bir katılımcının böyle bir vakayla karşı karşıya kalması durumunda ne yapacağına dair kişisel görüşlerle/ hükümlerle ya da vaka sahibinin yaptığı (ya da yapmadığı) şeyleri haklı çıkarmak veya kınamakla ilgili değildir. Katılımcıların diyaloğa girmeye ve birbirlerinden bir şeyler öğrenmeye istekli olması gerekmektedir. Bu nokta oturumun en başında net bir şekilde vurgulanmalıdır. Ayrıca sizin de kolaylaştırıcı olarak vaka sunmanın zor ve duygusal açıdan ağır olabileceğini göz önünde bulundurmanız gerekmektedir. Konuşmanın çok ağır veya rahatsızlık verici olması durumunda vaka sunucusunu korumak ve mola vermek sizin sorumluluğunuzdadır. ve mola vermek sizin sorumluluğunuzdadır.)
Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu + (Oturumun başlangıcında size oyunun arka planı ve amacı hakkında bilgi verilecek ve oyuna ilişkin açıklamalar yapılacaktır. Bunun yanı sıra sizden oyun esnasında paylaşılan bilgileri gizli tutmanız istenecektir.)
Diyalog içerisinde fikir yürütmek + (Oturumun sonunda, eğitimi alan kişilere &l … Oturumun sonunda, eğitimi alan kişilere i[https://embassy.science/wiki/Instruction:D1cde436-f9a2-41fa-8706-95ee6389f009 ki yüz yüze oturum arasındaki zamanda] yapmaları gerekenleri açıklayın. Bu noktada:1- Eğitim verdiğiniz kişileri kendi yürütecekleri eğitime katılacak kişilerin ihtiyaçları üzerine fikir yürütmeye teşvik edin. Katılımcılarınızın başka kişilere eğitim verirken bu kişilerin uzmanlık düzeyine, yerel bağlama ya da disiplin(ler)e göre eğitim üzerinde uyarlamalar yapmaları gerekebilir.2- [https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fmppqv189jxlqj/Self%20reflection%20form.pdf?dl=0 Öz beyan formlarını] dağıtın ve katılımcılara bu belgenin alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yönetirken edindikleri deneyimler üzerinde yorumlamalarda bulunmalarına yardımcı olmak için tasarlanmış bir öğrenme aracı olduğunu açıklayın. Eğitim verdiğiniz kişiler buradaki soruları yanıtlayarak kendi deneyimleri esnasında nelerin iyi gittiği, neleri geliştirmeleri ya da öğrenmeleri gerektiği veya hangi noktalarda daha fazla açıklamaya ihtiyaç duydukları üzerine fikir yürütebileceklerdir. 3- Eğitim verdiğiniz kişilere, (eğer mümkünse) eğitime katılan başka bir meslektaşları ile iletişime geçmelerini tavsiye edin. Bu, öğrenme deneyimini destekleyecek ve katılımcıların birbirlerine geri bildirim vermelerine ve (eğer uygunsa) alıştırmaları organize ederken üstlenilecek görevleri paylaşmalarına yardımcı olacaktır. ederken üstlenilecek görevleri paylaşmalarına yardımcı olacaktır.)
Technology and sustainability + (Our phones and devices seem small and port … Our phones and devices seem small and portable — but their environmental footprint is massive. This short article explores how technology products affect the environment throughout their lifecycle: from extraction of rare minerals to their disposal as e-waste.are minerals to their disposal as e-waste.)
Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu + (Oyuna başlarken eğitmeniniz tarafından dör … Oyuna başlarken eğitmeniniz tarafından dört kişilik gruplara ayrılmanız beklenmektedir. Ancak oyunun toplu olarak oynanması da mümkündür. Eğitmeniniz, oyunu toplu halde oynatmayı tercih etmesi durumunda sizlere sürecin nasıl ilerleyeceğine ilişkin bilgi verecektir.l ilerleyeceğine ilişkin bilgi verecektir.)
Uyarlanmış ikilem oyunu + (Oyunun oynanmasından sonra oturuma toplu olarak devam etmeniz istenecektir. Eğitmeniniz sizden bireysel tercihleriniz üzerine fikir yürütmenizi ve diğer katılımcılarla bu konu üzerine diyalog kurmanızı talep edecektir.)
THE PREPARED CODE: A Global Code of Conduct for Research during Pandemics + (Participants and research ethics committees should be promptly and fully informed about changes in the risks or burdens of participation in clinical research if new, relevant information becomes available during a trial.)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are divided into groups of 6 … Participants are divided into groups of 6 or fewer, with each participant in each group assigned one of the following roles:<div>*'''Healthcare professional (physician)'''*'''Representative of “HealthAI”''' *'''Patient rights advocacy'''*'''Medical ethicist'''*'''Representative of human resources of the hospital'''*'''Representative of a health insurance company'''</div>he hospital''' *'''Representative of a health insurance company'''</div>)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are divided into groups of 6 … Participants are divided into groups of 6 or fewer, with each participant in each group assigned one of the following roles: <div>*'''Healthcare professional (physician)'''*'''Representative of “HealthAI”''' *'''Patient rights advocacy'''*'''Medical ethicist'''*'''Representative of human resources of the hospital'''*'''Representative of a health insurance company'''</div>e hospital''' *'''Representative of a health insurance company''' </div>)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are invited to engage in a co … Participants are invited to engage in a conversation about the presented case. Playing the role of experts, they are invited to have a dialogue and learn from each other's perspectives. The aim is to formulate advice for the executive board. The following questions can support reflection and stimulate dialogue. These are questions that each expert might ask from their own specific perspective: <div><div>'''Healthcare professional'''*How will HealthAI affect your day-to-day work?*How will HealthAI affect your relationship with the patient?*Do you have concerns about informed consent? According to HealthAI, all patient data will be used for this AI system.*Are there any conditions / what is needed to implement Health AI? ''' ''''''Representative of HealthAI'''</div><div>*Who takes care of responsibilities when errors have been made?*A comment to bring to the table: The system prevents a lot of human errors.'''Representative of patient rights advocacy'''</div><div>*How to ensure that patients have a good understanding of how HealthAI will handle their data?*May patients refuse or give preference to another treatment suggested by HealthAI?*Can data security be fully guaranteed?'''Medical ethicist'''</div><div>*From early experience with AI systems, we have seen that the AI system can hallucinate and that biases (e.g. against certain patient groups) can be built into the algorithm. To what extent are these assumptions corrected in the system or by a healthcare professional?*What ethical dilemmas or concerns could you foresee? How can we deal with them?'''Representative of Human Resources of the hospital'''</div><div>*What kind of expertise do we need to have in our hospital to successfully implement HealthAI? Do we need to recruit new employees, or what training should be organized by whom?*What kind of impact may it have on the reputation of the hospital?'''Representative of a health insurance company'''</div><div>*How will this affect health insurance? Should we offer different types of insurance?*If a cheaper and perhaps better AI system for health care becomes available outside our nation, can we recommend it and put it into practice?</div></div>health insurance? Should we offer different types of insurance? *If a cheaper and perhaps better AI system for health care becomes available outside our nation, can we recommend it and put it into practice? </div></div>)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are invited to engage in a co … Participants are invited to engage in a conversation about the presented case. Playing the role of experts, they are invited to have a dialogue and learn from each other's perspectives. The aim is to formulate advice for the executive board. The following questions can support reflection and stimulate dialogue. These are questions that each expert might ask from their own specific perspective:<div><div>'''Healthcare professional'''*How will HealthAI affect your day-to-day work?*How will HealthAI affect your relationship with the patient?*Do you have concerns about informed consent? According to HealthAI, all patient data will be used for this AI system.*Are there any conditions / what is needed to implement Health AI? ''' ''''''Representative of HealthAI'''</div><div>*Who takes care of responsibilities when errors have been made?*A comment to bring to the table: The system prevents a lot of human errors.'''Representative of patient rights advocacy'''</div><div>*How to ensure that patients have a good understanding of how HealthAI will handle their data?*May patients refuse or give preference to another treatment suggested by HealthAI?*Can data security be fully guaranteed?'''Medical ethicist'''</div><div>*From early experience with AI systems, we have seen that the AI system can hallucinate and that biases (e.g. against certain patient groups) can be built into the algorithm. To what extent are these assumptions corrected in the system or by a healthcare professional?*What ethical dilemmas or concerns could you foresee? How can we deal with them?'''Representative of Human Resources of the hospital'''</div><div>*What kind of expertise do we need to have in our hospital to successfully implement HealthAI? Do we need to recruit new employees, or what training should be organized by whom?*What kind of impact may it have on the reputation of the hospital?'''Representative of a health insurance company'''</div><div>*How will this affect health insurance? Should we offer different types of insurance?*If a cheaper and perhaps better AI system for health care becomes available outside our nation, can we recommend it and put it into practice?</div></div>health insurance? Should we offer different types of insurance? *If a cheaper and perhaps better AI system for health care becomes available outside our nation, can we recommend it and put it into practice? </div></div>)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are supported in formulating a take-home message from the session. The teacher asks the participants to reflect on how their take home message will influence their practice.)
Role play: AI in Healthcare + (Participants are supported in formulating a take-home message from the session. The teacher asks the participants to reflect on how their take home message will influence their practice.)
Planetary health, human well-being and environmental justice + (Planetary health is not only a diagnostic … Planetary health is not only a diagnostic concept but also a call to action. You will now explore concrete pathways on mitigation, adaptation, and restoration, as well as the ethical and justice-oriented shifts required to reframe how we promote health and well-being.rame how we promote health and well-being.)
From waste to wisdom: rethinking plastic waste management in the lab + (Plastic is classified into seven main categories, each defined primarily by its distinct chemical properties. '''To learn more about these categories, match the types of plastic with their descriptions'''.)
Directionality towards planetary stewardship: From disconnection to relational praxis + (Please read through the introductory PowerPoint presentation “From disconnection to planetary stewardship")
Incorporating gender, health, and climate justice in your research: A reflexive question card exercise + (Please go through … Please go through the summary PowerPoint presentation about the rationale for incorporating gender, health, and climate dimensions together.These themes (gender and social positioning, health equity, climate justice, reflexivity, and intersectionality) help uncover hidden power dynamics in research. The goal is not to memorise definitions, but to reflect on how these issues relate to their own research. but to reflect on how these issues relate to their own research.)
Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for researchers and ethics reviewers) + (Please complete the multiple answers mini quiz)
Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for students and citizen scientists) + (Please complete the multiple answers mini quiz.)
Mapping research connections to environmental justice: Crisis Tree exercise + (Please go through the PowerPoint presentation (summary from chapter 6 of the Coloring Connections, [https://zenodo.org/records/14258538 Verdonk et al., 2024]))

Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for researchers and ethics reviewers) + (Please go through the PowerPoint presentation.)

Doing research with communities affected by climate change: Climate-conscious methodologies matrix (for students and citizen scientists) + (Please go through the PowerPoint presentation )
Mapping research connections to environmental justice: Crisis Tree exercise + (Please match the key terms related to the Crisis Tree with their descriptions)
Circularity in Research and Innovation + (Please take a close look at the following slide show, which provides a brief introduction to what the 9R strategy is and what it aims to achieve.)
Circularity in Research and Innovation + (Please watch the video carefully! The purp … Please watch the video carefully! The purpose of this exercise is to assess your understanding of the concept of circularity and its role in addressing today’s environmental challenges. Circularity is essential because it helps reduce resource extraction, waste, and pollution while keeping materials in use for as long as possible. By fostering more sustainable production and consumption patterns, circularity contributes to protecting ecosystems, supporting equitable economies, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.hieving the Sustainable Development Goals.)
Circularity in Research and Innovation + (Please watch the video carefully! The purp … Please watch the video carefully! The purpose of this exercise is to test your comprehension of circularity and the key processes that support it. Circularity is not only about recycling but also about refusing, reducing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing, remanufacturing, and repurposing materials—always guided by the principle of “reduce by design.”ed by the principle of “reduce by design.”)
Varieties of goodness in research - a rotary style exercise (variation to original VIRT2UE exercise)) + (Plenary discussion of oneVariety of Goodne … Plenary discussion of oneVariety of Goodness in research. The trainer prepared a presentation including:*Brief explanation of this Variety of Goodness*Links the Variety of Goodness to research*Links ECoC to this Variety of Goodness*Links examples for the preparation sheet by participants to the Variety of GoodnessIn each step of the reflection on this Variety of Goodness, the trainer asks the participants to also name examples of research, the code of conduct and own experiences., the code of conduct and own experiences.)
Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises + (Practice again (elements and variations of) the exercises supervised by a trainer. Discuss with your trainers and with the group the possibility to adapt the training materials.)
Debate and Dialogue + (Present an example (hypothetical) research … Present an example (hypothetical) research integrity case with a clearly formulated moral dilemma (please see practical tips for an example). While choosing a case, be aware of the target group. Pick a case that is recognizable for the target group - it should be part of their practice. It is important to choose a case which is short and has a clearly formulated dilemma (2 clear choices). Display the case description clearly on a monitor during the debate/dialogue. Participants should be able to re-read the case description at any time. Make sure you give enough information about the case, otherwise participants will start to ask questions about the case itself. to ask questions about the case itself. )
Measurement tools for collecting learning outputs: medium term effects + (Prior research has confirmed (Tammeleht et … Prior research has confirmed (Tammeleht et al., 2019; 2022) that using ‘the epistemic artefacts’ in the form of group reports or portfolios reflect the advancement of knowledge and co-creation of knowledge. In addition, a written collaborative ‘artefact’ with facilitator induced guidelines provides structural scaffolding like decomposing the task, asking leading questions, redirecting learners, goal orientation and highlighting important aspects (Tammeleht et al., 2020). Thus, providing a written group report to be filled during the training may act as a didactical as well as a measurement tool as after the training the facilitator can monitor the advancement of ethics competencies of learners based on the report (Kirkpatrick’s level 2).Group reports/portfolios can be analysed by using the ECAG (the SOLO taxonomy) and content criteria (ethical principles, ethical analysis, ethical approaches). Occasionally, it is possible to monitor the advancement of understanding of separate topics and this can also be visualised (see figure 1).[[File:Img19.png|center|frameless|450x450px]]Figure 1. Display of the learning process of one group based on their group portfolio. T1-T8 are topics; Ül1-4 are separate tasks outlined in the group report; numbers 0-4 indicate the SOLO levels.The tool is suitable for all target groups in HE context.An example template for a group portfolio can be found in Appendix 1.roup portfolio can be found in Appendix 1.)
The Middle Position + (Prior to the exercise, get in contact with … Prior to the exercise, get in contact with participants and ask them to reflect on a personal case or situation from their work as a researcher in which they experienced a kind of moral doubt about what happened or about what they could/should do/have done (i.e. cases in which it is absolutely clear that something is morally wrong with respect to are not good cases). It is important that participants reflect on their own experiences, yet the case does not have to be written down beforehand. It does not have to be a dramatic case, ordinary cases of questionable research practices are also suitable.able research practices are also suitable.)
The Middle Position + (Prior to the session you will be asked to sign a confidentiality statement to formalize the expectation that information shared during the exercise will be kept confidential by you and the other participants in the session.)
Virtues and Norms + (Prior to the session you will be asked to sign a confidentiality agreement in order to formalize the fact that the information shared during the exercise will be kept confidential and will be destroyed after the training.)
05 - REalistiC Decisions: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity + (Produce a synopsis of the case *Only include the facts of the case *If the issue is ambiguous, then attempt to clarify what issue or set of issues are at stake)
Eğitimi organize etme + (Programı ve takvimi tasarladıktan sonra eğ … Programı ve takvimi tasarladıktan sonra eğitimi ilan edin ve katılımcıları davet edin. Kimleri davet edeceğinize karar verirken lütfen VIRT2UE eğitiminin hedef kitlesinin öncelikle araştırmacılar veya araştırma konusunda deneyimi olan (yani araştırmacı olarak çalışmış ya da çalışıyor olan) eğitmenler/ eğitimciler/ öğretmenler olduğunu unutmayın. Eğitiminize katılan kişilerin araştırma doğruluğuna ilişkin temel bir anlayışı haiz olması gerekmektedir. Katılımcıları eğitime davet ederken örnek davet mektubunu kullanabilirsiniz.n örnek davet mektubunu kullanabilirsiniz.)
Practicing Reflection in Dialogue + (Provide contact information in case of que … Provide contact information in case of questions or if doubts arise during the practice time in between the participatory sessions. Set a deadline and give instructions for the submission of the self-reflection forms. This should be at least one week prior to the follow up participatory session.or to the follow up participatory session.)
Debatte und Dialog + (Präsentiere ein (hypothetisches) Fallbeisp … Präsentiere ein (hypothetisches) Fallbeispiel mit einer Research Integrity – Fragestellung, einschließlich eines klar formulierten moralischen Dilemmas (siehe „Praktische Tipps“ für ein Beispiel).Wichtig bei der Auswahl des Fallbeispiels: * Berücksichtige deine Zielgruppe, d.h. du solltest ein Fallbeispiel auswählen, das im Erfahrungshorizont der Teilnehmenden liegt, also z.B. einen Bestandteil ihres Arbeitsalltags beschreibt. * Wähle ein Fallbeispiel, das kurz formuliert ist und ein klar formuliertes moralisches Dilemma beinhaltet (d.h. es gibt zwei distinkte Handlungsmöglichkeiten).Zeige dieses Fallbeispiel deutlich lesbar während der Debatte / dem Dialog (z.B. auf einem Handout, einem Monitor, oder über den Beamer). Den Teilnehmenden sollte es möglich sein, die Fallbeschreibung während der Übung durchzulesen. Präsentiere den Fall mit genügend Informationen und lass Zeit für Rückfragen der Teilnehmenden, da diese Fragen ansonsten in der Übung auftauchen und die Debatte / den Dialog unterbrechen würden. Debatte / den Dialog unterbrechen würden.)
Evaluating the content of learning outputs + (REI leadership framework outlined in figur … REI leadership framework outlined in figure 4 (Tammeleht et al., 2022; Tammeleht et al., submitted) can be used to guide a meta-analysis of surveys or documents guiding the practices of REI.[[File:Img12.png|center|frameless|600x600px]]Figure 4. REI leadership framework (improved version from Tammeleht et al., submitted)The meta-analysis can be guided by the following template (figure 5) (from Tammeleht et al., submitted): {| class="wikitable"|+Figure 5. Template for the individual case meta-analysis (from Tammeleht et al., submitted).Data analysis example (based on the Estonian and Finnish national REI surveys):For the theme researchers’ needs evidence could be sought of what was perceived as threats or if the needs were directly asked for. For instance, the Finnish survey asked which dimensions of factors were considered as threats to research. The aspects of ownership and rights being unclear may indicate a need for a discussion in the research community or improved REI infrastructure elements.To gain insights about the community themes pertaining to REI infrastructure could be collected (e.g. guidelines, trainings, RI advisors, supervision, team support). For example, the Estonian survey asked if REI infrastructure elements were present and whether researchers had used them.Leaders’ competencies/characteristics became evident mostly from open answers (if they were present) or if there were direct questions about leaders in the institution. For instance, the Finnish survey had open answers that included topics pertaining leadership:“My community has excellent research leaders, but the relationships between them have become toxic. This causes them obvious stress, which is unavoidably reflected onto other researchers. There are plenty of models of good, ethical leadership from elsewhere. I have several different [...] superiors, and there are still more positive and supportive examples available than negative ones” (Salminen & Pitkänen, 2020).Research culture was interpreted from items displaying trust and/or courage, for instance how researchers perceive dealing with misconduct and/or how they perceive support. For example, the Estonian report indicated which forms of misconduct or QRPs were considered more problematic and which ones not so problematic. The survey indicates that salami-slicing is not considered very problematic and is a practice seen among colleagues as well as self-reported practice. Behaviour in the research community may indicate trends in the research culture.!'''Meta-analysis of a national research ethics/integrity survey'''Country: Link to the national survey:REI leadership principle I:Researchers’ needs – what is perceived as a threat? What are the needs?…REI leadership principle II:Community – infrastructure: guidelines, trainings, RI advisors; supervision, team support…REI leadership principle III:Leaders’ competencies – from open answers/ any questions that pertain to leadership/administration…REI leadership principle IV:Open research culture – trust, courage – how do researchers perceive dealing with misconduct, how do they perceive support?|}h misconduct, how do they perceive support? |})
Introduction to the evaluation of the effectiveness of Research Ethics and Integrity (REI) training + (REI training effectiveness should be appro … REI training effectiveness should be approached as a system. While measuring reactions and knowledge (or learning process) is quite simple, it is also important to measure common practices and the environment (impact on the institutions). Training outcomes are influenced by many factors, not least the match between perceived needs and what the training offers, that is, the alignment between needs, intended learning outcomes, training objectives, and training implementation.To get a holistic picture (i.e. to triangulate measurement) of the effectiveness of training it is recommended to combine different measurement tools, use them at various measurement points and align them with a common taxonomy. It is important to consider what to do with the results – what kind of changes are necessary to improve teaching and/or the environment to build a culture of integrity?vironment to build a culture of integrity?)
Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes + (Read about the concept of debate and dialogue and reflect on the differences between the two. Open the page about [https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:6217d06b-c907-4b09-af4e-b4c8a17b9847 dialogue versus debate].)
Preparatory Reading: Introduction to Concepts & Themes + (Read about virtue ethics and its relevance for research integrity. Open the page about [https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:520b3bc7-a6ab-4617-95f2-89c9dee31c53 virtues in research integrity].)
Modified Dilemma Game + (Read the instructions. Please note that th … Read the instructions. Please note that there are some differences between the original game and the modified RDG in terms of aims and applications. In the following steps the procedures for the use of the modified version are explained. This version requires participants not merely to play the game, but at the same time to reflect on their justifications, analyze their and others’ discussion processes, and work together to relate the case at hand with the elements of the European Code of Conduct and research integrity virtues. This version therefore takes longer, and is more demanding.Before the session:If using the Dilemma Game app: - Ask participants to download the [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game app]- Ask participants to watch the introductory [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKhT7qHh9T8&t=8s video]ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKhT7qHh9T8&t=8s video])
Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems + (Read the slides and complete the exercises below!)
Quality of research outputs and data sets + (Read the slides below and complete the interactive exercises!)
Creating and communicating a sustainable research culture + (Read the slides carefully and learn about the concept of climate mainstreaming within organisations and the key steps required for its successful implementation.)
Creating and communicating a sustainable research culture + (Read the slides carefully and reflect on h … Read the slides carefully and reflect on how research conferences and events can be planned and conducted in an environmentally responsible way. You will explore practical strategies to reduce carbon emissions, minimize waste, and promote social and environmental sustainability while ensuring accessibility and inclusivity.le ensuring accessibility and inclusivity.)