Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (This step focuses on the experience of the … This step focuses on the experience of the case presenter. The presenter is asked to describe a concrete personal situation in which he or she experienced the moral issue at stake. The case presenter is asked to provide a short but thick description of the facts of the situation. Facts can include the ‘feelings’ he or she experienced since feelings can be a useful indicator of the moral discomfort of the presenter and can often implicitly refer to certain values. often implicitly refer to certain values.)
• 04 - Moral Case Deliberation: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (This step involves the formulation of the … This step involves the formulation of the personal views, values, norms, arguments and choices in relation to the case. The participants express their own views of what they consider to be right.The facilitator might ask the participants to individually address the following points:</br></br>a)     It is morally justified that I choose option … (A, B or an alternative).</br></br>b)    Because of…. (which value or norm?)</br></br>c)     Despite of…. (which value or norm?)</br></br>d)    How can you limit the damage of your choice mentioned under (c)?damage of your choice mentioned under (c)?)
• Preparatory Viewing: Introduction to Concepts & Themes  + (This video explores how researchers’ moral … This video explores how researchers’ moral judgments can be affected by individual and contextual factors, explained by the VIRT2UE project for The Embassy of Good Science. <br /></br>[[File: MoralDisagreements.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIGuvc8Qbmw&list=PLabbUwyulArzx9SIqxfDXbtTELS8uWdFD&index=2]]</br></br></br>An exploration of how moral disengagement may occur among researchers due to maladaptive strategies to address conflicting imperatives in science. A virtue ethics approach might prevent the process of moral disengagement. In the video, the risk of moral disengagement is explored, as well as the importance of virtues in research and systems fostering research integrity.es in research and systems fostering research integrity.)
• The Middle Position  + (Through this exercise, you will foster ref … Through this exercise, you will foster reflection on personal experiences and moral uncertainty. For this reason, it is important to create a safe learning environment where participants feel confident to share their cases and ideas. </br></br>While facilitating the exercise, try to protect participants’ vulnerability and encourage participants to respect others’ opinions. Moreover, prior to the session, we recommend asking participants to sign a confidentiality statement, in order to formalize the expectation that the information shared during the exercise will be kept confidential.ng the exercise will be kept confidential.)
• Introduction to Research Integrity  + (Throughout this module, the ECoC is introd … Throughout this module, the ECoC is introduced and quoted as an important source of reference. A definition of research integrity is elaborated, as well as the four principles of research integrity, as outlined in the ECoC. A drag-and-drop exercise aims to familiarize with the document’s structure, and also introduces some norms outlined in the document.</br></br></br>[http://courses.embassy.science/what_is_research_integrity/story.html Open the course]arch_integrity/story.html Open the course])
• Introduction to Research Integrity  + (Throughout this module, the ECoC is refere … Throughout this module, the ECoC is referenced as importance guidance. A definition of research integrity is provided, as well as the four principles of research integrity outlined in the ECoC. A drag-and-drop exercise aims to familiarize with the document’s structure and introduces some norms outlined in the document.</br></br></br>[http://courses.embassy.science/what_is_research_integrity/story.html Open the course]</br></br>[[File:What is research integrity.png|link=http://courses.embassy.science/what_is_research_integrity/story.html]]</br></br>If you want to integrate this module into your institution's learning management system, you may download it as a SCORM Package [http://courses.embassy.science/What%20is%20research%20integrity_SCORM.zip here]0is%20research%20integrity_SCORM.zip here])
• IRECS Training format (template)  + (To introduce participants to the topic, yo … To introduce participants to the topic, you can either invite an expert to give a lecture or present the topic yourself (perhaps you are the expert).</br></br>Your lecture should cover the core ethical concepts related to [the topic of this session] and apply them to practical cases. The IRECS modules, including videos and examples, can be used to develop your lecture.</br></br>You can find an example of this here.</br></br>After the lecure dedicate 10 min to Q&A (if you are working with an expert some questions can be prepared in advance to get the discussion going).</br></br>'''<u><span lang="EN-US">Trainer Tip</span></u>''' <span lang="EN-US">Use questions to keep the lecture dynamic and engaging. Consider takinga breack at this point.</span> lecture dynamic and engaging. Consider takinga breack at this point.</span>)
• VIRT2UE Certification  + (To obtain the VIRT2UE certificate, you nee … To obtain the VIRT2UE certificate, you need to create a learning portfolio. The portfolio needs to include:</br></br><br /></br></br>*An overview table of tasks completed: https://community.embassy.science/uploads/short-url/kDU9xWHeyxdC4ER1toih5KJGE8H.docx</br>*Reflection forms detailing your experiences facilitating the participatory exercises : [https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fmppqv189jxlqj/Self%20reflection%20form.pdf?dl=0 Reflection form]</br>*Evidence of training 10 researchers (screenshot of zoom/attendance sheet/attendance declaration). Please get the permission from your participants to share their details with the EC funded VIRT2UE project.</br></br>You should also include the address you would like the certificate sent to (this can be a work or home address)!te sent to (this can be a work or home address)!)
• Interim Practice Work  + (To prepare for facilitating the exercises … To prepare for facilitating the exercises in your context you:</br></br>a. Go through the instruction manuals and other related materials such as videos and readings;</br></br>b. Prepare the necessary material for the exercises (e.g. PowerPoint presentations and/or the forms to send to the participants of the exercise). Please, be aware that it may be necessary to adapt the exercises. For example, if you are an ombudsperson at your institution, it may prompt reservations among your training participants if you ask them to share research integrity cases from their experience. You may therefore consider using only fictional cases (e.g. from the [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game Rotterdam Dilemma Game], or from [https://embassy.science/wiki-wiki/index.php/Special:BrowseData/Resource?_search_Resource_Type%5B0%5D=Cases The Embassy of Good Science] case section) instead.sy of Good Science] case section) instead.)
• The Middle Position  + (Together with all participants, formulate … Together with all participants, formulate some overarching lessons learned (for the group). Pay specific attention to the identification and justification of the middle position.</br></br>Ask participants how the lessons learned from this exercise relate to the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and in which way this exercise might help them in fostering the principles and virtues mentioned in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity;</br></br><br /></br></br>*Ask participants if and how this exercise and the idea of finding a Middle Position might help them when being confronted with a moral issue regarding Research Integrity in their work as researcher.</br>*Briefly repeat the aims of this exercise and ask participants to what degree they are met.</br></br>Please write down on the flip-chart the main lessons learned and some reflections on how this exercise might help participants when they are confronted with a moral issue regarding research integrity.with a moral issue regarding research integrity.)
• Reflecting on Experiences and Practicing Exercises  + (Together with the group you discuss the pl … Together with the group you discuss the plan for the day. Plan time both for practicing the exercises and for addressing theoretical and content questions. If more people want to practice the same exercise you can consider allowing them to co-facilitate it.onsider allowing them to co-facilitate it.)
• Translate the VIRT2UE guide into your own language  + (Trainees will start with the online course … Trainees will start with the online course, consisting of four modules.</br></br>The the instruction texts are listed below for each module separately:</br></br>[https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/JtQY5BoRoy7a2YxRW4FrNtrT Introduction to Research Integrity]</br></br>[https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/J9FeNvrxuvBZ6d2uLxDbpQPH Introduction of Virtue Ethics to Research Integrity]</br></br>[https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/AEpLMj1ET7GsHP4tUsg9nutn Virtue Ethics under Current Research Conditions]</br></br>[https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/qHZkUih5cAERRB5UUQ2JKezJ Introduction to Responsible Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling] Supervision, Mentoring and Role-modeling])
• Debate and Dialogue  + (Turn the focus to a dialogue and present t … Turn the focus to a dialogue and present the characteristics of a dialogue: slowing down, listening instead of telling, postponing judgment, asking questions (see practical tips). You can distribute an overview of the differences between a debate and a dialogue among the participants (see practical tips).ong the participants (see practical tips).)
• Ara dönem uygulama çalışması  + (Tüm alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yö … Tüm alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yönetin ve katılımcılarla birlikte deneyimlerinizi değerlendirin/ yorumlayın. Sonrasında [https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fmppqv189jxlqj/Self%20reflection%20form.pdf?dl=0 <u>özdüşünüm formunu</u>] doldurarak kendi deneyiminiz ve eğitmen olarak rolünüz üzerine fikir yürütün.miniz ve eğitmen olarak rolünüz üzerine fikir yürütün.)
• Orta Yol  + (Tüm katılımcılarla birlikte alıştırmadan ç … Tüm katılımcılarla birlikte alıştırmadan çıkarılan genel dersleri belirleyin. Orta yola ilişkin tanımlama ve temellendirmelere özellikle dikkat edin.</br></br>Katılımcılara bu alıştırmadan çıkarılan derslerle ECoC arasında nasıl bir ilişki bulunduğunu ve bu alıştırmanın ECoC’ta belirtilen prensip ve erdemlerin gözetilmesi konusunda onlara ne yönden yardımcı olacağını sorun;</br></br>* Katılımcılara, araştırmacı olarak Araştırma Doğruluğu ile ilgili ahlaki bir sorunla karşılaştıklarında bu alıştırmanın ve bir Orta Yol bulma fikrinin onlara yardımcı olup olmayacağını, eğer olacaksa ne yönden olacağını sorun.</br>* Alıştırmanın amaçlarını kısaca tekrarlayın ve katılımcılara bu amaçlara ne ölçüde ulaştığınızı sorun.</br></br>Yazı panosu üzerine alıştırmadan çıkarılan temel dersleri ve katılımcıların Araştırma Doğruluğu ile ilgili ahlaki bir sorunla karşılaştıklarında bu alıştırmanın onlara nasıl yardımcı olacağına ilişkin fikirlerinden bazılarını not alın.ilişkin fikirlerinden bazılarını not alın.)
• Protection of Research Participants  + (Use the flashcards below to test your knowledge!)
• Rights of Citizen Scientists  + (Use the flashcards below to test your knowledge!)
• Quality of research outputs and data sets  + (Use the flashcards below to test your knowledge!)
• Conflicts of interest in citizen science  + (Use the flashcards below to test your knowledge!)
• Risks to the environment, animals, plants, and ecosystems  + (Use the flashcards below to test your knowledge!)
• 06 - Teaching Research Ethics Tool : A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics  + (Usually, there are several possible courses of action. Some result in misconduct while others effectively and ethically solve the problem(s).)
• Exploring Training Materials on Open Science  + (Utilizing online training resources is ano … Utilizing online training resources is another way to put blended learning into practice. This method mixes traditional in-person instruction with the usage of the internet to let students create their own learning experiences. Trainees can gain from direction and engagement with a trainer while having access to flexible and interactive training options outside of the classroom by combining in-person and online training methods. The 'conventional' learning resources produced by the ROSIE project (refer to the [https://rosie-project.eu/rosie-knowledge-hub/ ROSiE Knowledge Hub]) can be utilized in conjunction with the online training resources for self-directed learning developed by ROSiE to facilitate blended learning in the classroom. </br></br>Training materials on responsible open science can be found for the fields of [https://zenodo.org/records/10799656 Social Sciences], [https://zenodo.org/records/10799691 Natural Sciences], [https://zenodo.org/records/10800651 Humanities], [https://zenodo.org/records/10801617 Health and Life Sciences] and [https://zenodo.org/records/10801722 Citizen Science]. In addition, the ROSiE project created a [https://zenodo.org/records/10795319 collection of case studies] that can be use in the traditional and/or online ROSiE training. Moreover, six different modules on responsible open science can be found [[Guide:E525ee0d-0d7e-4ba5-b19b-89e4a5029b2f|here]], on the Embassy of Good Science platformE525ee0d-0d7e-4ba5-b19b-89e4a5029b2f|here]], on the Embassy of Good Science platform)
• Sertifika  + (VIRT2UE sertifikasını alabilmek için 10 ar … VIRT2UE sertifikasını alabilmek için 10 araştırmacıya VIRT2UE yaklaşımı üzerine eğitim vermeniz gerekmektedir. VIRT2UE programı üç online modül ve beş katılımlı alıştırmadan oluşmaktadır. 10 araştırmacıyı 5 alıştırmanın 3’ü üzerinden eğitmeniz bizim için yeterlidir – bu, araştırma doğruluğu konusuna erdem temelli yaklaşımı öğrenmek için gerekli temeli sağlayacaktır. </br></br>10 araştırmacının eğitimi, program esnasında katılımlı alıştırmaların ‘uygulanması’ aşamasının bir parçası olarak ya da program bittikten sonra gerçekleştirilebilir. </br></br>Eğitiminize katılan araştırmacılara kendilerinin de birer eğitmen olabilmesi için gerekli olan detaylı bilgiyi verebilirsiniz. Bu opsiyonel bir adımdır ve VIRT2UE sertifikasını almanız için bir koşul değildir. Eğer gerçekten araştırmacıları eğitmen olmak üzere eğitmek isterseniz, bu kişilerin İyi Bilim Elçiliği web sitesindeki VIRT2UE kılavuzunu okuduklarından ve alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yönetmekle ilgili deneyimlerini paylaşmak için ekstra bir oturuma katıldıklarından emin olunuz. Yüz yüze toplantıların mümkün olmaması durumunda (örneğin pandemi esnasında) bu deneyim paylaşımı yazılı bir alıştırma, akran koçluğu ve/veya video konferans ile ikame edilebilir.veya video konferans ile ikame edilebilir.)
• Sertifika  + (VIRT2UE sertifikasını edinmek için bir öğr … VIRT2UE sertifikasını edinmek için bir öğrenme portföyü oluşturmanız gerekmektedir. Portföyünüz içerisinde bulunması gereken dosyalar aşağıda belirtilmiştir: </br></br>*Tamamlanan görevlere ilişkin tablo: https://community.embassy.science/uploads/short-url/kDU9xWHeyxdC4ER1toih5KJGE8H.docx</br>*Alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yönetirken edindiğiniz deneyimleri detaylandıran yorum formları: [https://www.dropbox.com/s/1fmppqv189jxlqj/Self%20reflection%20form.pdf?dl=0 Reflection form]</br>*10 araştırmacıyı eğittiğinizi gösteren belgeler (zoom görüşmelerinden alınmış ekran görüntüleri/ yoklama kâğıdı / katılım bildirimi)</br></br>Bunların yanı sıra sertifikanızın gönderilmesini istediğiniz adresi de yazmanız gerekmektedir (ev ya da iş adresiniz olabilir)!mektedir (ev ya da iş adresiniz olabilir)!)
• Erdemler ve Normlar  + (Vaka net bir biçimde anlaşıldıktan sonra k … Vaka net bir biçimde anlaşıldıktan sonra katılımcılardan kendilerini vakayı sunan kişinin yerine koymalarını ve eğer sunucu yerinde kendileri olsa bu ikilemde hangi erdem(ler)in (iki tane erdem belirlenmesi yeterlidir ancak daha fazlası da mümkündür) rol oynayacağını düşünmelerini isteyin. Bunun için katılımcılara şu soruyu sorabilirsiniz:</br></br>“Eğer vakayı sunan kişinin durumunda olsaydınız ve ne yapacağınıza karar vermeniz gerekseydi, sizin için bu kararı verirken hangi erdem önemli olurdu?”</br></br>Lütfen belirtilecek erdemlerin ikilemin seçeneklerinden biriyle bağlantılı olması gerekmediğini unutmayın. Bu aşamada katılımcılar söz konusu durumda doğrulukla hareket edebilmek için hangi ahlaki niteliği (erdemi) hayata geçirmeleri gerektiği üzerine fikir yürütmek durumundadır. Bağlamsal olarak, katılımcılardan seçtikleri erdemi takip edecek eylem kuralının (normunun) ya da davranışın ne olduğu üzerine fikir yürütmelerini isteyin. Bunun için kendilerine şu soruları sorabilirler:</br></br>“Bu durumda bu erdeme uygun davranabilmek için ne yapmam gerekir?”</br></br>“Bu durumda bu erdemi hayata geçirebilmek için nasıl bir eylem kuralını takip etmem gerekir?”</br></br>Lütfen aynı erdemle farklı normların ya da aynı normla farklı erdemlerin ilişkilendirilebileceğini unutmayın.lerin ilişkilendirilebileceğini unutmayın.)
• Erdemler ve Normlar  + (Vaka sahibi katılımcıdan, (önceden seçilmi … Vaka sahibi katılımcıdan, (önceden seçilmiş olan) vakasını anlatmasını ve vakanın neden ahlaki açıdan sorunlu olduğunu açıklamasını isteyin. Grupla birlikte, vakayı sunan katılımcının ikilemi (ikilem içerisindeki seçenekleri) formüle etmesine yardımcı olun (yani A’yı mı yapmalıyım yoksa B’yi mi?) ancak ikilemin doğru formülasyonunun ne olduğunu belirleyecek kişinin vaka sahibi olması gerektiğini unutmayın. Bu aşamada iki alternatif eylem tarzı üzerine odaklanmaya çalışın ve üçüncü bir seçenek ya da yaratıcı çözümler aramaktan kaçının. Bu, diyaloğa odaklanmaya yardımcı olacak ve insanların ikilemden bir çıkış yolu aramaya ya da hızlı bir çözüm bulmaya çalışmasını engelleyecektir. İkilemi ve vakayı tanımlayan anahtar kelimeleri yazı panosu üzerine not alın.r kelimeleri yazı panosu üzerine not alın.)
• How to use the Embassy: a Starter Pack!  + (Want to contribute to the Embassy of Good … Want to contribute to the Embassy of Good Science? It's simple! All you need is an ORCiD login and you can get started right away. </br></br>See the video below for detailed instructions on how to use your ORCiD to log into the Embassy.</br></br><div class="video-button" data-href="https://www.youtube.com/embed/8s2hroYxT3I"></br><span class="video-button-label">ORCiD Login</span></br><span class="video-button-duration">0:47 min</span></br></div>; <span class="video-button-duration">0:47 min</span> </div>)

• Ethical and Societal Foundations of Open Science  + (Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises!)
• Protection of Research Participants  + (Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises!)
• Rights of Citizen Scientists  + (Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises!)
• Conflicts of interest in citizen science  + (Watch the interactive video below and complete the exercises!)

• The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes  + (Watch the video below about how the TRUST code addresses these issues to make global research partnerships more equitable.)
• The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes  + (Watch the video below about the global moral values on which the TRUST code is based.)
• The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes  + (Watch the video below about what researchers and research ethics committees can do to ensure equitable research partnerships.)
• The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes  + (Watch the video below to learn about what funders can do to ensure equitable research partnerships.)
• Debate and Dialogue  + (Watch the video to get an impression of th … Watch the video to get an impression of the VIRT2UE 'Debate & Dialogue Exercise'. </br>[[File:D&D2.png |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=249umsbOIG0&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=4]]</br><br></br></br></br>Debate and dialogue are two different communicative modes. The following video explores the differences between the two and helps the viewer develop a better understanding of their dynamics. These differences are also described in more detail in the theme page '[https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:6217d06b-c907-4b09-af4e-b4c8a17b9847 dialogue versus debate'].</br></br>[[File:ByVirtueof.png |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-nI32JBOyo]][[File:ByVirtueof.png |link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-nI32JBOyo]])
• Modified Dilemma Game  + (Watch the video to have an impression of t … Watch the video to have an impression of the 'Modified Dilemma Game' of the VIRT2UE Train-the-Trainer program.</br>[[File: DGE.png|link=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qpq-oWPdvJQ&list=PLabbUwyulAry4tzZ12eHl5JOJhJGiaE6k&index=6]]</br></br>If you are playing the app version of the game, your trainer will ask you to download the Dilemma Game [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game app] before the session and watch this [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKhT7qHh9T8&t=8s video] for an introduction to using the app.&t=8s video] for an introduction to using the app.)
• The TRUST Code in 45 Minutes  + (Watch the videos below to learn more about the development and implementation of the San Code of Research Ethics by members of the San community.)
• Translate the VIRT2UE guide into your own language  + (We have made a text version of the trainin … We have made a text version of the training guide with all instructions and both the trainer and trainee perspectives included. This can be used to easily translate the guide.</br></br>[https://public.3.basecamp.com/p/Kfoj9Eo6iDvgjaDj6qBjzdGh Here] you can find the word count for each part of the training guide. This can be used to obtain a quote for the translation from a translator.ote for the translation from a translator.)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What alternatives exist?)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What could be considered as forseeable consequences?)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What do you think is the best thing for X to do?)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What is the dilemma?)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What might be the consequences of the various alternatives?)
• 01 - Value Analysis: A Method for Analysing Cases in Research Ethics and Research Integrity  + (What might be the short- as well as the long-range consequences?)
• Recognition and Networking  + (When you have become a certified VIRT2UE trainer, you will receive an invitation to join the ENERI e-Community. Fill in this application and return it to the coordinators of the ENERI e-community [https://eneri.eu/e-community/ here])
• Der Selbstauskunfts-Ansatz: Eine Reflexion über das Konzept des Guten in der Wissenschaft  + (Während der Übung wird euch eure Trainer:i … Während der Übung wird euch eure Trainer:in anleiten, eine Gruppenreflexion über das Konzept des Guten zu führen. Um diese Reflexion zu durchzuführen, werdet ihr:</br></br>1.   lernen, auf welche verschiedenen Arten Forschung ''gut'' sein kann;</br></br>2.   in kleinen Gruppen über eure Überlegungen aus dem Selbstauskunfts-Arbeitsblatt sprechen (eine Liste von Fragen, die diese Gruppenbesprechung erleichtert, findest du unter “Praktische Tipps”);</br></br>3.   darüber reflektieren, wie die unterschiedlichen Arten, auf die Forschung ''gut'' sein kann, kategorisiert werden können;</br></br>4.   über die Inhalte des Europäischen Verhaltenskodex für Integrität in der Forschung reflektieren, indem ihr diskutiert, wie die unterschiedlichen Arten des Guten in der Forschung im Kodex erläutert werden.</br></br>Die Übung wird auf den Gedanken und Ideen aufbauen, die du und die anderen Teilnehmenden auf dem Selbstauskunfts-Arbeitsblatt festgehalten habt. </br></br>Eine detaillierte Beschreibung der einzelnen Schritte dieser Übung ist bei den Anweisungen für die Trainer:innen zu finden.weisungen für die Trainer:innen zu finden.)
• Modified Dilemma Game  + (You and your group will be asked to fill o … You and your group will be asked to fill out tables to identify the principles and practices of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, and scientific virtues, that are relevant to the dilemma at stake. </br></br>[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 1.png|thumb|'''Table 1: Which principles from European Code for Research Integrity can you identify in each dilemma?''']]</br><br /></br>[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 2.png|thumb|'''Table 2. Which research misbehaviors can you identify in this dilemma?''']]</br><br /></br>[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 3.jpg|thumb|'''Table 3. Which scientific virtues are important when deciding on a course of action?''']]</br><br />[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 3.jpg|thumb|'''Table 3. Which scientific virtues are important when deciding on a course of action?''']] <br />)
• Modified Dilemma Game  + (You will be asked to reflect on the proces … You will be asked to reflect on the process, and to evaluate if the learning objectives were met. You will be invited to have a brief dialogue on what you might have just learned as a group. You may be asked to seek answers to questions such as the following:</br></br><br /></br></br>*Was it easy or difficult to identify the relevant principles and virtues in the chosen dilemma?</br>*Did this exercise help you with identifying and connecting to formally defined principles, such as those in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity?</br>*Did most of the players agree or disagree with the final choice?</br>*What were the main points of contention?</br>*How come people disagreed (e.g. differences in experience, training, background, values, norms…)?</br>*Was any alternative option proposed?</br>*Did anybody change her/his mind as a result of the discussion?</br>*What is needed in order to do the moral good in your work setting? What were the most convincing arguments used in the discussion?</br>*On which areas do you feel there is insufficient consensus?</br>*How to best address such future dilemmas in your daily work?address such future dilemmas in your daily work?)
• Modified Dilemma Game  + (You will be invited to the plenary. The trainer will ask you to reflect on your individual choices and engage in a dialogue with other participants.)
• Modified Dilemma Game  + (You, as a group, will be asked to present a brief summary of what has just been discussed in your group. You may assign a member as a spokesman to shortly present the results of your discussion.)
• Deneyimler üzerine fikir yürütme ve alıştırmaları uygulama  + (Yüz yüze alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olar … Yüz yüze alıştırmaları kolaylaştırıcı olarak yönetme ve kullanma konusundaki deneyim ve uzmanlığınıza dayanarak; katılımcılarla birlikte, kendi hedef gruplarının yeterlilik düzeyi ve öğrenme ihtiyaçları, bu grupların ayrıntılı olarak tartışmak istediği şeyler ve bu konuların alıştırmalara nasıl katılabileceği üzerine tartışın. Katılımcılara İyi Bilim Elçiliği web sitesindeki eğitim materyallerine nasıl erişebileceklerini gösterin. Ayrıca, bu platformdaki toplulukla platformun tartışma sayfası üzerinden nasıl etkileşime geçebileceklerini ve eğitim materyalleri üzerinde nasıl değişiklik talep edebileceklerini de açıklayabilirsiniz.ep edebileceklerini de açıklayabilirsiniz.)
• Modified Dilemma Game  + ([[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 1.png|t … [[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 1.png|thumb|'''Table 1: Which principles from European Code for Research Integrity can you identify in each dilemma?''']]</br>Ask participants to work in groups to fill out the below tables. You may suggest groups to assign a member as a spokesman to shortly present their discussions in the next step.</br>[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 2.png|thumb|'''Table 2. Which research misbehaviors can you identify in this dilemma?''']]</br></br></br></br></br>[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 3.jpg|thumb|'''Table 3. Which scientific virtues are important when deciding on a course of action?''']]</br><br />[[File:Modified Dilemma Game Table 3.jpg|thumb|'''Table 3. Which scientific virtues are important when deciding on a course of action?''']] <br />)
• Training Initiatives for Research Ethics and Integrity  + ([[Guide:Bbe860a3-56a9-45f7-b787-031689729e … [[Guide:Bbe860a3-56a9-45f7-b787-031689729e52|The VIRT2UE Train the Trainer program]] is designed for researchers and educators across various disciplines who wish to become Research Integrity trainers. It adopts a virtue-based approach, encouraging participants to reflect on their own perspectives and understanding of research integrity. The program emphasises personal case reflection and practical experiences, aiming to create a strong link between theoretical knowledge and real-world application.ical knowledge and real-world application.)