View source for Resource:Af266b39-20a3-4b97-a876-08eebb428fe6

{{Resource
|Resource Type=Cases
|Title=Misconduct ruling is silent on intent
|Is About=Mavens of research ethics often insist that there is a clear difference between sloppy science and scientific fraud. But if ever there was a case that blurs that line, it is that of Marc Hauser, a high-flying evolutionary psychologist who resigned from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 2011, after the university found him guilty of misconduct<ref>https://www.nature.com/news/misconduct-ruling-is-silent-on-intent-1.11390</ref>.
|Important Because=The definition of misconduct can be interpreted in different ways.
|Important For=researchers; phd students; research leaders
}}
{{Link
|Has Link=https://www.nature.com/news/misconduct-ruling-is-silent-on-intent-1.11390
}}
{{Related To}}
{{Tags
|Has Location=USA
|Has Virtue And Value=Reliability; Honesty
|Has Good Practice And Misconduct=Misconduct; Falsification
|Related To Research Area=Psychology
}}